PM
To: Redhat listi
Cc: Ragnar Wiencke
Subject: Re: MSN, IPTABLES and NAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Warner wrote:
>channel on one, and only one, port. Until that happens, NetMeeting and
>secure networks are at different poles.
Sort of. There is support for H-32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Warner wrote:
>channel on one, and only one, port. Until that happens, NetMeeting and
>secure networks are at different poles.
Sort of. There is support for H-323 over NAT in iptables, though its
(last I checked) experimental, and not availa
Best advice - forget NetMeeting. If you search through the MS
knowledgebase for NetMeeting and firewalls you will find that NetMeeting
needs the other end to be able to establish a data connection back to you
... on any port. So, to be able to use NetMeeting you need to have a
pretty open firew
Hi there.
I installed a Linux box as a router firewall for my
home adsl connection. We use MSN on both win and mac boxes and that works just
fine until we try to use voice conversation or netmeeting vith video, there
are communcation problems. I used it before using the linux router so I kn
