Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-14 Thread Jake Colman
EW> - fetchmail on the Linux system gets the mail from the ISP. I EW> schedule EW> this via cron. EW> - MTA (sendmail in my case) EW> - Fetchmail can automatically kick things over to sendmail EW> - Sendmail automatically runs procmail EW> - Procmail does my filter

Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-06 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I'm not set on how to achieve dial on demand functionality. Might pick up on advice from Edward Dekkers to use a combination of wvdial and pppd, although diald looks good in principle. Like I said, don't get me wrong - I LOVE diald. Just haven't been able to get it working on recent versions of

RE: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-06 Thread Roland Hill
From: Gary [mailto:gary-list-redhat@;mygirlfriday.info] Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2002 6:24 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS] On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeab

Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-05 Thread Gary
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to >those of us who are trying to get up to speed. > > Now for the implementation phase. Well, what did you finally select ?

RE: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-05 Thread Roland Hill
Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to those of us who are trying to get up to speed. Now for the implementation phase. Regards, Roland Hill # This e-mail me

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-05 Thread Hella
Do you have a static IP with your dial-up connection? You need a static so that you can point the MX record for your domain to your Linux box. (unless you are queing the mail somewhere else and sucking it downstream) Once past this hurdle, it is pretty straight forward: Configure your MTA to a

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Edward Dekkers
> -Diald to have dial on demand functionality with the modem OK, every man and his dog has tackled your main problems, I'll tackle this one. I used diald way back on 5.2 and loved it. Upgraded to 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 and it broke at every step and I had to change heaps of configuration. I haven't manage

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Gary
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > > Being a new user, I would appreciate if you could kick me in the right direction on >the following issue. > I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to >receive email, filter the c

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote: > My simple peer to peer network consists of 1 x RH7.3 box and 2 x Win98 boxes. SAMBA >is configured and operational. > > I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to >receive email, filter the content,

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Kent Borg
[Oops, in my first attempt at sending this I didn't use my subscribed address. Second try...] On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote: > -MTA (sendmail, postfix, qmail etc) to deliver > [...] > If some applications are more new user friendly than others then > please advise.

Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Roland Hill
Hi List, Being a new user, I would appreciate if you could kick me in the right direction on the following issue. My simple peer to peer network consists of 1 x RH7.3 box and 2 x Win98 boxes. SAMBA is configured and operational. I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I w