Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 03:11 10/5/2003, you wrote:
Anyway I'll try to make minimum with custom setup from RH8 and with
ignoring dependiences. Will see how it works.
Ignoring dependencies is not usually a good idea. A product depends on
another for a reason usually...
OK, I have managed
At 11:07 10/7/2003, you wrote:
OK, I have managed to install only 365 megs directly with RH8
distribution. That is without perl,sendmail, openssl, openssh and some
other garbage but with gcc and kernel headers. After I have succesfully
copiled and installed latest versions of perl, openssl,
Rodolfo J. Paiz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, October 07, 2003 10:51 AM said:
It comes down to the fact that Red Hat has to make the installation
easy for millions of users and they do their best to make a
generally-pleasing approximation of minimal. Then they leave each
user the
At 12:01 10/7/2003, you wrote:
Wouldn't it be just as easy for them to create yet another option called
bare minimum or bare bones or something like that which includes
only the packages required to have a bootable system? From there the
user could add whatever packages they wanted.
It is probably
Did you even look at the RULE page that someone suggested to you? That
is exactly what RULE does: allow you to install a Red Hat Linux system
into older hardware, or any hardware with less memory (down to 6MB RAM
in some cases), and install a much smaller set of packages than Anaconda
usually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 05 October 2003 03:25 am, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Did you even look at the RULE page that someone suggested to you?
That
is exactly what RULE does: allow you to install a Red Hat Linux
system into older hardware, or any hardware
Michael Fratoni wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 05 October 2003 03:25 am, Sasa Stupar wrote:
Did you even look at the RULE page that someone suggested to you?
That
is exactly what RULE does: allow you to install a Red Hat Linux
system into older hardware, or any
At 03:11 10/5/2003, you wrote:
Anyway I'll try to make minimum with custom setup from RH8 and with
ignoring dependiences. Will see how it works.
Ignoring dependencies is not usually a good idea. A product depends on
another for a reason usually...
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
L. K. Pierce wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:17, R Snchez wrote:
Wasn't there some type of distro proyect that was precisely a RedHat
adaptation for minimal systems?
Yes, it's called RULE. http://www.rule-project.org
Yes, that's nice but I would like that guys from Redhat make a minimal
At 11:29 10/4/2003, you wrote:
L. K. Pierce wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:17, R Sánchez wrote:
Wasn't there some type of distro proyect that was precisely a RedHat
adaptation for minimal systems?
Yes, it's called RULE. http://www.rule-project.org
Yes, that's nice but I would like that guys
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:04:08PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
Did you even look at the RULE page that someone suggested to you? That is
exactly what RULE does: allow you to install a Red Hat Linux system into
older hardware, or any hardware with less memory (down to 6MB RAM in some
At 15:13 10/4/2003, you wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:04:08PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
Did you even look at the RULE page that someone suggested to you? That is
exactly what RULE does: allow you to install a Red Hat Linux system into
older hardware, or any hardware with less memory
There's a lot being said about RULE, and I regret the fact that most of the
things said are pointed out by people who don't know what RULE is.
What it is NOT:
* A distro
* A distro that takes packages made by Redhat and cracks them to fit their
own logo.
What it IS:
* A project that tests which
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:40:48AM +0200, R Sánchez wrote:
There's a lot being said about RULE, and I regret the fact that most
of the things said are pointed out by people who don't know what RULE
is.
[snip]
What it IS:
* A project that makes avaidable an installer which picks
those
At 17:49 10/4/2003, you wrote:
Copyright issues - NO. Trademark issues - YES, if you call the result
Red Hat Linux. It's simply not Red Hat Linux. From what I've read, it
is a very valuable project to a lot of people, but the result is not Red
Hat Linux.
But Ed... nobody is calling the result
- Original Message -
From: Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: RULE (branch of former 'Minimal install RH8?')
| Copyright issues - NO. Trademark issues - YES, if you call the result
| Red Hat Linux. It's simply not Red Hat Linux. From
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 04 October 2003 07:49 pm, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:40:48AM +0200, R Sánchez wrote:
What it IS:
* A project that makes avaidable an installer which picks
those apps from your original redhat iso's.
Really don't
Hi!
I am thinking of making a fresh install of RH8 with minimal option (476
megs). Then I myself to compile and install PHP, Apache2, Squid, Samba,
Wu-ftp.
The question is if I will be able to compile all this with the software
which is allready installed with this minimal instalation or I
You'll need gcc, kernel headers and some dev libs, and some other packages.
-Original Message-
From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Minimal install RH8?
Hi!
I am thinking of making a fresh install of RH8
, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: Minimal install RH8?
| You'll need gcc, kernel headers and some dev libs, and some other
packages.
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 10:16 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Minimal install RH8
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:17, R Snchez wrote:
Wasn't there some type of distro proyect that was precisely a RedHat
adaptation for minimal systems?
Yes, it's called RULE. http://www.rule-project.org
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
