Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-06 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
The money would be made by offering services to companies like Dell, to help them differentiate their products from others. For example, helping Dell to make a "Multimedia PC" where the whole thing is oriented around doing Multimedia in Linux. Things like knowing what music composition programs t

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-06 Thread Matt Rowley
IMHO, putting Gnome and KDE toy desktops with Linux is a mistake in an effort to try and draw Windows users away from windows. Gnome and KDE look SO amatureish and unprofessional. Even XFCE which looked a lot like CDE has started to look like Gnome. CDE is the most professional desktop I've seen

RE: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-06 Thread Wade Chandler
acOSX interface just more keyboard friendly. Wade -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Ribbrock Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OS Desktop Business Model? On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:49:46PM -0500,

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-06 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:49:46PM -0500, Jeff Wimmer wrote: [...] > Gnome and KDE look > SO amatureish and unprofessional. Even XFCE which looked a lot like CDE has > started to look like Gnome. CDE is the most professional desktop I've seen > on linux, [...] Ahem. You *are* aware that this is

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-05 Thread Jack Bowling
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:17:37AM -0400, Kevin MacNeil wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:54:46PM -0700, bruce wrote: > > > my $0.02 worth..and i don't normally follow this group/thread for > > linux to compete/succeed against windows/msoft on the desktop... there > > needs to be a rock soli

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-05 Thread Kevin MacNeil
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:54:46PM -0700, bruce wrote: > my $0.02 worth..and i don't normally follow this group/thread for > linux to compete/succeed against windows/msoft on the desktop... there > needs to be a rock solid office set of apps... for 20% of the price... > > then you would see m

RE: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread bruce
ughes Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 7:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OS Desktop Business Model? On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 17:55, Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:49:46PM -0500, Jeff Wimmer wrote: > > > at a reasonable price and marketed correctly with Openoffice, they

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Bret Hughes
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 17:55, Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:49:46PM -0500, Jeff Wimmer wrote: > > > at a reasonable price and marketed correctly with Openoffice, they'll have a > > desktop that competes hands down with Windows. > > There's still one big difference ... windows is

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Ed Wilts: >What makes you think that Red Hat has given up on the desktop? There is >the current RHEL WS line although I will agree that for the home user, >this doesn't compete with Windows for pricing. Well, we all know now that the Red Hat Linux boxed set was not profitable.. It seems to me

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Jeff Wimmer
So very true. JEFFREY WIMMER - Original Message - From: "Hal Burgiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 5:55 PM Subject: Re: OS Desktop Business Model? > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:49:46PM -0500, Jeff Wimmer wro

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:49:46PM -0500, Jeff Wimmer wrote: > at a reasonable price and marketed correctly with Openoffice, they'll have a > desktop that competes hands down with Windows. There's still one big difference ... windows is for weenies, and Linux is not. -- Hal Burgiss -- red

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Jeff Wimmer
- Original Message - From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 4:36 PM Subject: Re: OS Desktop Business Model? > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:28:16PM -0300, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote: > > Given

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Jason Dixon
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 17:36, Ed Wilts wrote: > I believe that we will soon see Red Hat make a push back into the SOHO > market with a new boxed product that will be very competitive against > Windows (financially)... It would not surprise me to see a big push > into other markets with this produc

Re: OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Ed Wilts
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:28:16PM -0300, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote: > Given that most of Microsoft's profit comes from the desktop, I'm wondering: > if Linux, as I see it, is on its way to becoming a complete, competitive > desktop system, would this money simply cease to flow? Is the

OS Desktop Business Model?

2003-10-04 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Given that most of Microsoft's profit comes from the desktop, I'm wondering: if Linux, as I see it, is on its way to becoming a complete, competitive desktop system, would this money simply cease to flow? Is there any model at sight for profitable Desktop distros? It looks like RedHat has given