Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-19 Thread burk
> > This is an implementation bug in either postfix (doubtful) or the listserver > software. I can verify that it is NOT postfix. I run postfix on my mail servers and I tested it (knowing that it would pass) as soon as this thread started. Postfix does The Right Thing. -burk -- [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-18 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On 18 Sep 2000 07:32 Nitebirdz wrote: >On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Luke C Gavel wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: >> >> > >> > I am suprised that one dot on a line by itself does not hose your mail. >> > I believe a period and a newline tells sendmail and fetchmail for that >> > matt

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-18 Thread Nitebirdz
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Luke C Gavel wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > > > > > I am suprised that one dot on a line by itself does not hose your mail. > > I believe a period and a newline tells sendmail and fetchmail for that > > matter that the end is here. Actaully not sure abo

RE: Possible list bug [It IS a bug] -- confirmed

2000-09-16 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On 15 Sep 2000 15:08 John MacLean wrote: >Determining where the problem lies takes a bit more troubleshooting. Does >the same thing occur if you send this message to other recipients >(indicating problem with your sender-SMTP not dot-stuffing your message)? >Does it occur on this list for others

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-16 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On 15 Sep 2000 12:08 Bret Hughes wrote: >I am suprised that one dot on a line by itself does not hose your mail. >I believe a period and a newline tells sendmail and fetchmail for that >matter that the end is here. Actaully not sure about the sendmail part >but I know it confused the hell out of

Re: Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-16 Thread Kirk
Just checking this out for myself. Excuse the interuption. start after here.. see the end remark? ... ... ... end here >On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Anthony E . Greene wrote: > On 15 Sep 2000 11:41 Luke C Gavel wrote: > >If I type more than two dots consecutively on separate lines, the > >remainde

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On 15 Sep 2000 11:41 Luke C Gavel wrote: >If I type more than two dots consecutively on separate lines, the >remainder of the message seems to get truncated. To confirm >this, I'm trying it in this message again: Okay, let's try this again. ___ Redh

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread Anthony E . Greene
On 15 Sep 2000 11:41 Luke C Gavel wrote: >If I type more than two dots consecutively on separate lines, the >remainder of the message seems to get truncated. To confirm >this, I'm trying it in this message again: Is it possible that it's your mail client or your ISP's MTA? -- Anthony E.

RE: Possible list bug [It IS a bug]

2000-09-15 Thread John MacLean
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible list bug [It IS a bug] On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Luke C Gavel wrote: > > Hi, > > If I type more than two dots cons

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread Luke C Gavel
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > > I am suprised that one dot on a line by itself does not hose your mail. > I believe a period and a newline tells sendmail and fetchmail for that > matter that the end is here. Actaully not sure about the sendmail part > but I know it confused the hell

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread burk
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Luke C Gavel wrote: > Okay...so who wrote that particular Request-For-Comment? Some > chimpanzee that scientists are trying to 'talk' to? I guess part > of the experiment included an email account for the monkey...and > Behold! RFC821 was born! The late, great, Jonathan B.

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread Luke C Gavel
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Pete Peterson wrote: > This isn't a list bug, it's the behavior specified in RFC821. > Okay...so who wrote that particular Request-For-Comment? Some chimpanzee that scientists are trying to 'talk' to? I guess part of the experiment included an email account for the monkey

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread Pete Peterson
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:41:57 -0300 (ADT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke C Gavel) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Possible list bug > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi, > > If I type more than two dots consecutively on separate lines, the > rema

Re: Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread Bret Hughes
Luke C Gavel wrote: > Hi, > > If I type more than two dots consecutively on separate lines, the > remainder of the message seems to get truncated. To confirm > this, I'm trying it in this message again: > > ___ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Possible list bug [It IS a bug]

2000-09-15 Thread Luke C Gavel
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Luke C Gavel wrote: > > Hi, > > If I type more than two dots consecutively on separate lines, the > remainder of the message seems to get truncated. To confirm > this, I'm trying it in this message again: > > ___ > Redhat-list m

Possible list bug

2000-09-15 Thread Luke C Gavel
Hi, If I type more than two dots consecutively on separate lines, the remainder of the message seems to get truncated. To confirm this, I'm trying it in this message again: ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mai