RE: CD writing faster when CD-ROM also uses ide-scsi

2003-03-26 Thread Ward William E DLDN
-Original Message- From: Michael Wardle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Bill On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:26, Ward William E DLDN wrote: I hadn't seen any replies to this yet, so I'll venture an observation of my own: CDRW should be the master device on any IDE chain that they

RE: CD writing faster when CD-ROM also uses ide-scsi

2003-03-26 Thread Molnar Peter
I have 48x media right here. It was bought in winter I think. On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:57, Ward William E DLDN wrote: -Original Message- From: Michael Wardle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Bill On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:26, Ward William E DLDN wrote: I hadn't seen any replies

RE: CD writing faster when CD-ROM also uses ide-scsi

2003-03-25 Thread Ward William E DLDN
-Original Message- From: Michael Wardle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi A few weeks back, I purchased a new Lite-On 52x52x24 EIDE/ATAPI CD-RW drive, which supports a buffer underrun technology Lite-On calls BURNproof (or something similar). When I first tried to write a CD image

Re: CD writing faster when CD-ROM also uses ide-scsi

2003-03-25 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:26:54AM -0500, Ward William E DLDN wrote: I hadn't seen any replies to this yet, so I'll venture an observation of my own: CDRW should be the master device on any IDE chain that they are attached to, at least whenever possible. I've noticed marked reliability

RE: CD writing faster when CD-ROM also uses ide-scsi

2003-03-25 Thread Michael Wardle
Hi Bill On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:26, Ward William E DLDN wrote: I hadn't seen any replies to this yet, so I'll venture an observation of my own: CDRW should be the master device on any IDE chain that they are attached to, at least whenever possible. I've noticed marked reliability concerns