RE: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread StarrDust
Thomas Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 1998 11:16 PM To: StarrDust Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook > I am just a newbie here on the RH list, so please excuse any bad manners > of crashing into a conversation, > but uh-h-h

RE: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread GateKeepeR News
I like Outlook Express, honestly. It is one of the best mail clients I have seen (besides PINE :) ). Although Outlook Full just plain SUCKS!! Bryan On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Greg Thomas wrote: | |> I am just a newbie here on the RH list, so please excuse any bad manners |> of crashing int

Re: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread Greg Thomas
As painful as using Outlook 97 is for e-mail it worked for me. I was just using Outlook for my calendar and contacts so I figured I'd try it as an e-mail client. I didn't use it long because it was very feature poor. With the Outlook internet mail connectors I believe it's your basic, poorly im

Re: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread Steve Curry
Standard E-Mail as in MS Office 97's Outlook. Has anyone used outlook with sendmail as the server before? If so where there any problems? >If you are just going to be using standard e-mail then as per the above >there is absolutely no reason to use Exchange. You can set up Linux and >Sendmail

RE: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread StarrDust
your time, StarrDust -- From: Greg Thomas Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 1998 7:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook As painful as using Outlook 97 is for e-mail it worked for me. I was just using Outlook for my calendar and contacts so

RE: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread Chuck Mead
On 7 Apr, Greg Thomas wrote: > >> I am just a newbie here on the RH list, so please excuse any bad manners >> of crashing into a conversation, >> but uh-h-h, could you be just a bit more detailed in what you mean when you >> say Outlook is 'feature poor', and what more Eudora has to offer as far

RE: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread Greg Thomas
> I am just a newbie here on the RH list, so please excuse any bad manners > of crashing into a conversation, > but uh-h-h, could you be just a bit more detailed in what you mean when you > say Outlook is 'feature poor', and what more Eudora has to offer as far as > features. > The one big thi

Re: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread William T Wilson
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Steve Curry wrote: > Standard E-Mail as in MS Office 97's Outlook. Has anyone used outlook with > sendmail as the server before? If so where there any problems? Lots, because sendmail isn't the server that Outlook uses. You should be looking at the IMAP and/or POP3 servers (

Re: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook

1998-04-08 Thread Dave Price
Steve, The server has to have pop3 support installed as well as sendmail. Configure outlook as a pop3 client. It works great except that outlook is a very 'thick' client - takes forever to load, and wastes a lot of ram if all you use it for is email - look at eudora pro or calypso as better sin9