Hi Ed
Sorry for not including all the searching and look ups we had done. We
had searched Microsoft and the internet.
All the things mentioned in what you kindly sent and what we had found
were checked. This was the reason for my query.
david
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, No
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 12:15:52PM -0500, dbrett wrote:
> I have been getting my mail from the companies email server (microsoft
> exchange) for long time with fetchmail. This morning I ran fetchmail and
> pulled off 100+ messages without any problem. An hour later I tried again
> and got the fol
nope. that's the strange thing. i've not done anything to this box. i've
been using the same setup for 3 years now. the one thing is is that IT is
transitioning over to an exchange 2k box. during the process the moved the
mailboxes to the 2k server and realized that had more to do - so they
mo
that's the trick! thank you so much Anthony!
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 02:24, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server.
> >the output i included was
On 4/10/02 4:12 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed the keys forming the message:
> yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server.
> the output i included was from a verbose fetchmail run.
Then I concur with Tony - if you're not using fetchmail's '-S' option to
fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server.
>the output i included was from a verbose fetchmail run.
Then the server that is rejecting you is your own local machine (the Linux
box).
yes i am using fetchmail to POP mail off an exchange 5.5 server.
the output i included was from a verbose fetchmail run.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Edward Marczak wrote:
> On 4/10/02 2:38 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed the keys forming the message:
>
> > our corporation is mucki
On 4/10/02 2:38 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed the keys forming the message:
> our corporation is mucking with their exchange server. i've been getting
> email off it with fetchmail for about 3 years now and all of a sudden they
> are adding spam filters left and right. well no
actually the spam filtering is being done at the IT level which i have no
control over. :-(
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Statux wrote:
> Do you have a spam filter configured into sendmail for user jwallen? Looks
> as if it's finding too many messages for that user coming in so sendmail
> is blocking
Do you have a spam filter configured into sendmail for user jwallen? Looks
as if it's finding too many messages for that user coming in so sendmail
is blocking them.
fetchmail is cute in how it'll make sense of several rc file formats :)
Mine looks similar to this:
poll host proto pop3 user u
I am not sure...you are best to consult the fetchmail site:
http://www.gnu.org/directory/fetchmail.html
ross
www.antivirus.ie
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, SoloCDM wrote:
> My .fetchmailrc has the following defaults:
>
> poll mail. proto pop3 user password
>
Looks like you created this by hand. My fetchmailrc seems to require the
keyword "with" before "proto", and a few other anomolies compared to
yours. Mine works
SoloCDM wrote:
> The following error displays in duplicate every time I execute
> fetchmail, even though the mail downloads without any problems:
>
> fetchmail: Unknown/ Unimplemented command
> fetchmail: Unknown/ Unimplemented command
>
> My .fetchmailrc has the following defaults:
>
Hello, Marco.
Just to share some ideas. Would like to know the parameters you used with
fetchmail and if there's a ~/.fetchmailrc. You may like to read man fetchmail
for some additional info. I would usually use:
fetchmail -uusername -pPOP3 mail.isp.com
Anyway, I suppose the SMTP listener refer
14 matches
Mail list logo
