On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 06:30, gaston wrote:
> I tried enabling proxy arp, and now it`s working. Thank you very much for
> your help.
>
>
Hmm. Well, I am glad you got it working. I just saw your post, and was
going to suggest that you try filtering by ip address and drop the mac
address stuff.
I tried enabling proxy arp, and now it`s working. Thank you very much for
your help.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
> Message: 6
> Subject: Re: Routing problem
> to what is the variables $IP and $MAC set?
>
> again,
>
> iptables-save -c > gastonrules.out
>
> and mail me the file gastonrules.out and lets see what is actually
> making it to iptables.
>
> B
** Reply to message from gaston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 12 Sep 2003
15:32:32 -0300
> -Original Message-
> This is feeling like a firewall issue to me so lets look more closely at
> that.
>
> Not knowing your firewall script (I have lazily allowed shorewall to
> abstract my thinking to
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 13:32, gaston wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> This is feeling like a firewall issue to me so lets look more closely at
> that.
>
> Not knowing your firewall script (I have lazily allowed shorewall to
> abstract my thinking to it way of doing things) why don't we t
-Original Message-
This is feeling like a firewall issue to me so lets look more closely at
that.
Not knowing your firewall script (I have lazily allowed shorewall to
abstract my thinking to it way of doing things) why don't we take a look
at the rules as the are actually in iptables
This is feeling like a firewall issue to me so lets look more closely at
that.
Not knowing your firewall script (I have lazily allowed shorewall to
abstract my thinking to it way of doing things) why don't we take a look
at the rules as the are actually in iptables
why don't you post the output
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 09:23, gaston wrote:
> Yes, from the linux box I can reach everything.
>
> This are some things I found in /var/log/messages
>
> kernel: martian source 208.53.98.198 from 127.0.0.1, on dev eth0
> kernel: ll header: 00:50:fc:89:70:ef:00:06:28:cf:ad:e0:08:00
>
> These are the
Yes the Cisco is properly configured and working fine, routing other stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Gargiullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: redhat mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:04:56 -0400
Subject: Re: Routing problem
> Just curious, do you
ep 2003 23:15:05 -0500
Subject: Re: Routing problem
> On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:43, gaston wrote:
> > Internet
> > |
> > |
> > |
>
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 00:15, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:43, gaston wrote:
> > Internet
> > |
> > |
> > |
> > | |
> > | Cisco 2600|
> > | |
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:43, gaston wrote:
> Internet
> |
> |
> |
> | |
> | Cisco 2600|
> | |
> IP: 208.53.98.254
>
Title: Message
thanks for your help Jason and Ivan. It worked and
got me out of a sticky situation!
- Original Message -
From:
Jason
Staudenmayer
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:21
PM
Subject: RE: routing problem
Lisa wrote:
Hi,
If anyone out there can help me with this I'd be extremely grateful..
I have a firewall with external ip 62.17.173.173
The gateway is 62.17.173.254
We have a machine inside the firewall with private ip addresses.
I need to have a setup where this machine is visible to the ou
Title: Message
Why
not setup an IP alias on the firewall for 62.17.173.10
and then have your iptables/ipchains forward all
traffic to the internal server.
-Original Message-From: Lisa
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:15
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED
chard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bret Hughes
Sent: 14 October 2002 02:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Routing problem (not related to Red Hat)
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 19:00, Joseph Teo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if you gu
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 19:00, Joseph Teo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if you guys are able to help out with a conceptual problem.
>
> Question: What does a router do, if it discovers that it is about to route an IP
>datagram back over the same network interface on which the datagram arrived
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Kiran Kumar M wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a network structure as following.
>
> eth1 - 192.168.1.254<---Internal Network
> eth0 - xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx <---External Network
> eth2 - yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy <---Management Port
>
> I am using ipchains
Thanks, thats what I needed.
RB
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Thierry ITTY wrote:
> >Could someone please tell me where to read about arp? I can't find it in
> >the kernel docs and I can't find a howto with much about it. man arp is
> >mostly about the command, not the protocol.
>
> ARP is defined in
>Could someone please tell me where to read about arp? I can't find it in
>the kernel docs and I can't find a howto with much about it. man arp is
>mostly about the command, not the protocol.
ARP is defined in rfc826, so have a look at it
but i think you might have to read some other rfc's, as 82
Stuff editing the thing by hand. Use linuxconf.
That way you know the right files are being edited and
whatever processed need to be restart, get restarted.
-Original Message-
From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 26 November 1999 3:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
At 11:16 PM 11/25/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I setup a default gateway using the route command and now I can ping any ip
>address on the Internet. The problem is I cannot use any domain names. I put
>the nameserver addresses in the /etc/resolv.conf and I have the standard
>"host files dns" in the ns
On Thu, 7 May 1998, Alfonso Barreto Lopez wrote:
> I need to connect to a computer that is phisically in other place from my
> local network, but it has the same domain that my network, is there a way
> to say not to search in the local network but to search directly
> out?
Do not quite understan
When you set up a static route, you are really telling the Linux box where the
next hop is must send packets to reach its destination. This next hop is a
router (or such) that must exist on your network.
In your scenario, your Linux box must send the packets to the 108.62.62.137
address. Once t
24 matches
Mail list logo
