REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Another question (first one was X Install)... I just installed a SCSI tape in this machine (running RH6.2). The system's SCSI card sees it, all is well - however: [root@c41:~]# mt -f /dev/st0 status SCSI 2 tape drive: File number=-1, block number=-1, partition=0. Tape

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread `Jack Bowling
"Ashley M. Kirchner" wrote: Another question (first one was X Install)... I just installed a SCSI tape in this machine (running RH6.2). The system's SCSI card sees it, all is well - however: [root@c41:~]# mt -f /dev/st0 status SCSI 2 tape drive: File number=-1, block

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
`Jack Bowling wrote: Only thing I could think of would be IRQ contention. Is there anything else on IRQ 11? Nope, that was the first thing I checked. It's the only thing on that IRQ, same goes for the card address. However, since you brought it up, is there any sure way of finding out

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Bret Hughes
"Ashley M. Kirchner" wrote: Another question (first one was X Install)... I just installed a SCSI tape in this machine (running RH6.2). The system's SCSI card sees it, all is well - however: [root@c41:~]# mt -f /dev/st0 status SCSI 2 tape drive: File number=-1, block

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Giulio Orsero
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:14:48 -0700, you wrote: `Jack Bowling wrote: Only thing I could think of would be IRQ contention. Is there anything else on IRQ 11? Nope, that was the first thing I checked. It's the only thing on that IRQ, same goes for the card address. However, since you

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Bret Hughes wrote: There is a tape in the drive, right? (Had to ask, you never know) *grin* Yes, asking (and checking) can sometimes be a good thing. :) Yes, there's a tape in. AMK4 -- W | | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Giulio Orsero wrote: Have you reserved irq 11 to "legacy isa" in the bios? Not sure, but I'm about to go look (however, it's also an old 486 motherboard, so there's a good chance it doesn't even have that option in it) Is the pnp disabled on the aha152x? I believe so. But, I'm

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Ray Curtis
"amk" == Ashley M Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: amk Another question (first one was X Install)... I just installed a amk SCSI tape in this machine (running RH6.2). The system's SCSI card sees amk it, all is well - however: amk [root@c41:~]# mt -f /dev/st0 status amk SCSI 2

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Okay, I was right. Have you reserved irq 11 to "legacy isa" in the bios? The motherboard is old enough not to have this. Being that it's a 486, with just ISA slots on it, I'm not worried. Is the pnp disabled on the aha152x? Disabled...now. Should I be setting a DMA? By

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Ray Curtis wrote: Have you tested the 'rewind' and 'offline' commands both with a tape in the drive of course. Rewind, yes. Gave me the same error. Offline, no. If these don't work, what does your device file /dev/st0 look like: crw-rw1 root disk 9, 0 Aug 24

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Giulio Orsero
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:13:19 -0700, you wrote: Is the pnp disabled on the aha152x? Disabled...now. Should I be setting a DMA? By default it's not set. Don't know, I think we just disable pnp and don't touch anything else. You can make a quick test, disable pnp and then reboot and tar

Re: REPOST: SCSI Tape

2001-02-13 Thread Jack Bowling
** Reply to message from "Ashley M. Kirchner" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:14:48 -0700 `Jack Bowling wrote: Only thing I could think of would be IRQ contention. Is there anything else on IRQ 11? Nope, that was the first thing I checked. It's the only thing on that