Hi,
> > I like it that RedHat is pushing the newest technology in the 8.0
release
> > because it will very probably get the software to production quality
faster,
> > but I wouldn't build a production server on it :)
>
> Would it best to downgrade apache to the 1.x version such as RH 7.3
> ver.?
Hello,
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 09:24, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > There are bugs in everything, and I'm sure that RH 8.0 has bugs in it's
> > apache and php.
> > However I haven't heard anything about it, so it must not be a major
> > problem for just learning how to write php stuff.
>
> The
Hi,
> There are bugs in everything, and I'm sure that RH 8.0 has bugs in it's
> apache and php.
> However I haven't heard anything about it, so it must not be a major
> problem for just learning how to write php stuff.
The 'bug' in the PHP and Apache versions that come with RH 8.0 is that the
Apa
Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
My questions are:
Is the 'stock' apache with RH 8.0 compiled for php support?
Is it a module that needs to be put in the httpd.conf?
Is there a new php rpm available any where?
There are bugs in everything, and I'm sure that RH 8.0 has bugs in it's
apache and php.
How
I would like to learn PHP. I was reading on the PHP website that there
is a problem with the version of apache that ships with RH 8.0.
However, since then a new version of PHP has been released which I'm
guessing has solved the problems with apache 2.x.
My questions are:
Is the 'stock' apache w
