does the whole idea of SWAT
sound insecure?
Bill Ward
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/15/03 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: SWAT exploits?
Ward,
This port's on the radar screen but at a very low level:
http://isc.incidents.org/port_details.html?p
Ward,
This port's on the radar screen but at a very low level:
http://isc.incidents.org/port_details.html?port=901
(Select the % plot and you'll see a small spike last December)
Are you perhaps using a dynamic IP address? If so, perhaps a recent
user of the same address had a SWAT interface s
te the other
day over "To firewall, or not to firewall"; I wouldn't
have caught this on the server (I don't log rejected
or ignored ports on that machine) but I do on the
firewall.
-Original Message-
From: xwangbu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/15/03 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: SWAT
t not disable it? or just install it if u don't need it.
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 06:43, Ward William E DLDN wrotz
I had never used SWAT before, but all of a sudden, my firewall is being
> hammered by folks trying to use it; has there been a new exploit that came
> out in the last few days?
>
> Si
I had never used SWAT before, but all of a sudden, my firewall is being
hammered by folks trying to use it; has there been a new exploit that came
out in the last few days?
Since I don't even run SAMBA, I have no need for SWAT, but it's
disconcerting to see ten different IPs trying to access it in
