On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 02:32, Lars Eighner wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Christensen Tom wrote:
>
> > Just upgraded my laptop from redhat 8 to redhat 9,
>
> Why did you do that?
Probably for the same reason I'll be doing it in the next couple of
days: because I want to take a look. If it doesn't
Christensen Tom wrote:
Just upgraded my laptop from redhat 8 to redhat 9,
now I can't get better than 800x600 resolution on my laptop
whats the problem? Is this a known issue? Any known workaround?
it is a savage/IX chipset and both 8 and 9 recognize it fine in the
install, but 9 will only let
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Christensen Tom wrote:
> Just upgraded my laptop from redhat 8 to redhat 9,
Why did you do that?
I just want to make a point here. If you have a working system and you
don't know there is something mission-critical on the new version, it is
foolish to upgrade - and especiall
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:36:46AM +, Christensen Tom wrote:
> Just upgraded my laptop from redhat 8 to redhat 9,
> now I can't get better than 800x600 resolution on my laptop
> whats the problem? Is this a known issue? Any known workaround?
> it is a savage/IX chipset and both 8 and 9 recogn
Just upgraded my laptop from redhat 8 to redhat 9,
now I can't get better than 800x600 resolution on my laptop
whats the problem? Is this a known issue? Any known workaround?
it is a savage/IX chipset and both 8 and 9 recognize it fine in the install,
but 9 will only let me select 800x600 and
