Re: Sendmail and RH80

2002-12-19 Thread Chuck Mead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Rick Johnson enscribed the following: RJ>Chuck Mead wrote: RJ>| IMHO postfix is a better solution though you, and everyone else, may not RJ>| want to hear that. In short postfix loads the box less and runs faster. RJ> RJ>I've seen

Re: Sendmail and RH80

2002-12-19 Thread Rick Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Mead wrote: | IMHO postfix is a better solution though you, and everyone else, may not | want to hear that. In short postfix loads the box less and runs faster. I've seen alot of recommendation for postfix and for good reason. I, however, being

Re: Sendmail and RH80

2002-12-19 Thread Chuck Mead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Steven Duckworth enscribed the following: SD> SD> SD>I am having an issue with Sendmail (Version 8.12.6) throttling SD>connections. It is running on a Dell 2550 Server with RH8.0. Sendmail is SD>running fine, but from time to

Sendmail and RH80

2002-12-19 Thread Steven Duckworth
I am having an issue with Sendmail (Version 8.12.6) throttling connections. It is running on a Dell 2550 Server with RH8.0. Sendmail is running fine, but from time to time we have large bursts of traffic to student mailing lists on campus (Up to 6000 Students). When these bursts occur, Send