Hello all,
I am using Redhat 7.2 Linux
when ftp down from the server very fast, but when send to server very
very slow or quits. same with mail down fast , very slow to server
But this was just fine until internal card stopped, I went from t-conx
to
twisted pair, because t-conx was cut and miss
Hello redhat-list,
Someone recently asked why their ftp connection was slow through
their firewall. It is most likely due to the ftp server doing a
tcp/auth (port 113) back to the destination client. If you are not
accepting in and forwarding port 113 from the inside of your
firewall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My problem is with ftp, to say it is slow would be an understatement.
1.8M in hours, actually I think it stopped shortly after it was
started. The Odd part is the X over eth0 works fine 1-2 M/sec. I am
using a Linksys Pocket LAN adapter ( LPT1)
I've got 10 RH5.0 servers, I've got the slow FTP problem only on one,
with error messages : "eth0: timeout waiting for Tx RDC."
--
Jean-Christophe PRAUD - LUDEXPRESS
Game Web: http://www.pbm-chronos.com
Perso Web: http://www.brutaltruth.com
Ph'nglui mglw'
Hi,
I've got exactly the same message on a RH5.0 proxy with two DEC Tulip
cards. But my proxy has no performance problem. I posted a message about
that in this list, but received no answer.
I've got the slow FTP problem too, on another RH5.0 box with a NE2000
compatible card. Its s
was relayed to me by our WAN support area. It might cause the problem you
describe.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 1998 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: Slow FTP
>
>
>Ambrose 'Bo&
Ambrose 'Bo' Barry wrote:
> It took just as long on the Ethernet LAN to transfer! (about 3000
> bytes/sec). Only two LAN cards on the LAN, total cable length of 10 feet! I
> was using the FTP Explorer program on the Win95 computer.
Hey this is odd. I have the same thing. I have a bunch of RH5
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, March 09, 1998 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: Slow FTP -Reply
>I think there is really some problem with ftp in Red Hat 5.0. I have
an old
>version Slackware (Kernal 1.1.59) Linux box as well as RH 5.0 box on
the LA
I think there is really some problem with ftp in Red Hat 5.0. I have an old
version Slackware (Kernal 1.1.59) Linux box as well as RH 5.0 box on the LAN.
Previously, we forwarded all Corporate Internet E-mail traffic to the
Slackware box for transmission so as to relieve the Netware Server workloa
Try running the System Monitor on the Windown 95 box during an xfer to see
what the network is doing.
At 08:42 PM 3/9/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I just set up RH5.0, downloaded the 18MB Netscape RPM file (at 28.8!) on my
>Win95 system, then tried to ftp it to my Linux box using Ethernet LAN cards.
>
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Ambrose 'Bo' Barry wrote:
> I just set up RH5.0, downloaded the 18MB Netscape RPM file (at 28.8!) on my
> Win95 system, then tried to ftp it to my Linux box using Ethernet LAN cards.
>
> It took just as long on the Ethernet LAN to transfer! (about 3000
> bytes/sec). Only two
I just set up RH5.0, downloaded the 18MB Netscape RPM file (at 28.8!) on my
Win95 system, then tried to ftp it to my Linux box using Ethernet LAN cards.
It took just as long on the Ethernet LAN to transfer! (about 3000
bytes/sec). Only two LAN cards on the LAN, total cable length of 10 feet! I
w
12 matches
Mail list logo
