Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-10 Thread Jerry Winegarden
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, rpjday wrote: On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote: On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's replaced by

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-10 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 08:19:21AM -0400, Ward William E PHDN wrote: [...] That said, there is nothing that says a Winmodem can't run under Linux... except that you need to have knowledge of how the hardware hooks into the software DSP. And that tends to be proprietary. [...] And what

RE: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-07 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
making it impossible to develop a single LINUX driver. That's why only one or two have been made to work... -Original Message- From: Jake McHenry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 3:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stupid question about winmodems

RE: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-07 Thread Ward William E PHDN
with a moving target, in terms of what kernel to use. Oh well. Bill Ward -Original Message- From: Peter Massey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @nswcphdn.navy.mil Subject: RE: Stupid question about winmodems

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-07 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Steve Dixon wrote: Actually our Lexmark that we have isn't. Hmm...last I heard most of them were WinPrinters -- they are / were very limited under Linux. John -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: Stupid question about winmodems NOT

2000-07-07 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This describes Plug 'n Play not "soft" modems Linux supports Plug 'n Play True. Howeve,r it's also true of "soft" modems. :-) John -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

RE: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-07 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Peter Massey wrote: On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's replaced by software that EMULATES the missing hardware,

Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Stephen King
Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? SK -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread tcurl
"Stephen King" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/06/2000 11:04:35 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Stupid question about winmodems Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? SK -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Juan Martinez
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:04:35 -0700 From: Stephen King [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Stupid question about winmodems Resent-Date: 6 Jul 2000 15:06:45 - Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-cc: recipient

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's replaced by software that EMULATES the missing hardware, thus making the processor do all the work that

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread rpjday
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote: On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's replaced by software that EMULATES the missing hardware,

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Jake McHenry
A regular modem has hard set com ports and IRQ's, usually set by jumpers or not adjustable at all. A winmodem rely's on the windows operating system to determine what com port it uses when you install the modem, and it get's set temporaroly in a type of flash memory on the modem. This is why

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Stephen King
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? SK From one Stephen King to another (imagine that!) winmodems are missing hardware that the windows OS makes up for. Thus winmodems need windows to operate and don't

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, rpjday wrote: one wonders what the next world's dumbest invention will be. winmonitors? winkeyboards? wincd-roms? winhard-drives? god, i wish i was being facetious. sigh. They've already got WinPrinters. What do you think the Lexmark printers are? :-/ John

Re: Stupid question about winmodems (for rday)

2000-07-06 Thread tcurl
PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Stupid question about winmodems On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, John Aldrich wrote: On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Steve Dixon
Actually our Lexmark that we have isn't. John Aldrich wrote: On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, rpjday wrote: one wonders what the next world's dumbest invention will be. winmonitors? winkeyboards? wincd-roms? winhard-drives? god, i wish i was being facetious. sigh. They've already got

Re: Stupid question about winmodems NOT

2000-07-06 Thread tcurl
This describes Plug 'n Play not "soft" modems Linux supports Plug 'n Play Jake McHenry [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/06/2000 03:23:27 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Stupid question about winmodems A regular modem has hard set

RE: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Peter Massey
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Stephen King wrote: Could someone define for me the difference between a winmodem and a regular modem? WinModem is missing most of the hardware that makes a modem. It's replaced by software that EMULATES the missing hardware, thus making the processor do all the work that

RE: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Juha Saarinen
%- one wonders what the next world's dumbest invention will be. %- winmonitors? %- winkeyboards? wincd-roms? winhard-drives? god, i wish i was being %- facetious. sigh. Well, hrrmm... I'm reasonably certain that the next generation of external modems which utilise the V.92 standard will be

RE: Stupid question about winmodems (for rday)

2000-07-06 Thread Juha Saarinen
%- How about the WinPC? It would have no hardware at all, just %- software that %- emulates all the hardware. Now wouldn't that upset Intel? And %- that might %- lead to WinMicrosoft .. . A.k.a. VMWare ;-) -- Juha -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Stupid question about winmodems

2000-07-06 Thread Steven W. Orr
I know! Winabagels! They're wheels that only work on Winnebagos. :-) -- -Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Stranger things have happened but none stranger than this. Steven W. Orr- Does your driver's license say Organ Donor?Black holes are where God \

RE: Stupid question about winmodems (for rday)

2000-07-06 Thread brandond
But VMware is awesome! -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.