> Or symbolic link is a one-way knowledge that only A2 knows about it but
> R has no clue at all?
Yes, R has no clue. You can even create symlinks to nonexistent files.
Jon
>
> -tk
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
in the FS?
Especially if the FS containing A2 is not mounted yet.
Or symbolic link is a one-way knowledge that only A2 knows about it but
R has no clue at all?
One-way. Creating backwards references would be difficult and ugly,
especially when using filesystems from other machines, as in NFS.
--
r
crease the Links
> number), instead of searching through all the files in the FS?
Only way to find them is to search.
> Especially if the FS containing A2 is not mounted yet.
This is one case where you can't use a hard link and symbolic links are
useful.
> Or symbolic link is a one
ecially if the FS containing A2 is not mounted yet.
Or symbolic link is a one-way knowledge that only A2 knows about it but
R has no clue at all?
-tk
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
it to /usr/src/linux". So, I'm looking
> for info on installing a kernel source tree that corresponds to this new
> kernel and how to create a symbolic link to it. Any advice would be
> much appreciated. Thanks for your time.
You want the package kernel-source-2.4.20-19.8.i3
Ok the symbolic link part seems simple enough just using the ln command;
so I'm just in need of info re installing installing a kernel source
tree. Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Daniel Donoghue
Sent: Saturday, Augu
this new
kernel and how to create a symbolic link to it. Any advice would be
much appreciated. Thanks for your time.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ubject: Re: Kernel source tree & symbolic link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 18:17:45 -0700, Daniel Donoghue wrote:
> I recently upgraded my kernel to Redhat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-19.8_SMP
> i686. In order to compile another app properly, I now have to
Where did you get the kernel? Was it an rpm? If your install more than
one source tree they lie around in /usr/src/* just change the linux link
to point to the kernel tree that you want.
On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 18:25, Daniel Donoghue wrote:
> Ok the symbolic link part seems simple enough j
Given that I have a GMT offset via the select box below, how the hell do
I turn that into a symbolic link to one of these files? How do I know
which file to link too?!!! UGH. This is such a stupid way to set the
timezone, why didn't RedHat just have a file with the offset in it?
Something
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:09:49PM +1100, I wrote:
[...]
| It is worth noting that in the above, "" must be a pathname
| with will work when standing in the directory containing the symlink.
| So and absolute pathname will be fine (unless you move the link), but a
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 06:53:30PM -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| man ln
| ln -s
It is worth noting that in the above, "" must be a pathname
with will work when standing in the directory containing the symlink.
So and absolute pathname will be fine (unless you move the
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Raoul Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Easy one for the pros out there.
> Can anybody tell me how to create a symbolic link?
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Raoul
>
man ln
ln -s
___
Redhat-list mailing l
Title: RE: Symbolic link?
To create a sym link called "linux" to a directory called "linux1" you would type "ln -s linux1 linux"
Otherwise try "man ln" at the command line to check out your options
-Original Message-
From: Raoul Anderson [ma
man ln
Kirk
>At 09:52 AM 2/23/01 +1100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Easy one for the pros out there.
>Can anybody tell me how to create a symbolic link?
>
>Thanks for your help,
>
>Raoul
>
>_
>Do You Yahoo!?
Hi,
Easy one for the pros out there.
Can anybody tell me how to create a symbolic link?
Thanks for your help,
Raoul
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
It should not matter if it's a directory or not. rm should remove the
symbolic link.
HB
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Yale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: Symbolic link
> So I first do a
-Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Holland
> > Sent: December 11, 2000 10:54 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Symbolic link
> >
> >
> > rm -r does recursive deletes
> >
>
]
> Subject: RE: Symbolic link
>
>
> rm -r does recursive deletes
>
> Jason
>
> >
> > Thanks, but the link is a directory, in fact it's the /usr/src/linux
> > directory that links to /usr/src/linux-2.2.16. I guess I'm wondering if
> > the
Yale
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Horth
> > Sent: December 10, 2000 11:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Symbolic link
> >
> >
> > rm bar
> >
> >
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Horth
> Sent: December 10, 2000 11:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Symbolic link
>
>
> rm bar
>
>:)
>
> At 11:34 PM -0500 10/12/00, Rob Yale wrote:
> >Can someone please tell me how to get rid of a symbolic lin
rm bar
:)
At 11:34 PM -0500 10/12/00, Rob Yale wrote:
>Can someone please tell me how to get rid of a symbolic link created with
>'ln -s foo bar'?
--
Nitro - 3D Visualisation, Graphics & Animation
Ph (+61 2) 9810 5177 - Fx (+61 2) 9810 0199
Can someone please tell me how to get rid of a symbolic link created with
'ln -s foo bar'?
Thanks,
Rob Yale
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
i'm still a linux newbie, but i'm guessing...
change to the dir where that command was executed and
rm bar
On Sunday 10 December 2000 22:34, you wrote:
> Can someone please tell me how to get rid of a symbolic link created with
> 'ln -s foo bar'
'rm bar' :)
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Rob Yale wrote:
> Can someone please tell me how to get rid of a symbolic link created with
> 'ln -s foo bar'?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rob Yale
>
>
>
> ___
>
> I have tried in vain to for a while to fix a problem with my
> symbolic links. (They all appear to be orphaned, and blink red, but they
> are not broken and work fine). Does anyone know if there is a kernel
> module ore something of that sore that could be missing and thus cause
> this p
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, David Brewster wrote:
> (You can usually get a good list of hacked binaries from doing
> rpm -q -a | xargs rpm -V | grep bin
rpm -Va | grep bin
will accomplish the same.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://
One other thing. The rootkit changes file attributes so rpm reinstall fails.
If you do "lsattr /bin/ls" or top or whatever then I think the attributes will
have probably been changed to prevent deletion. You can do
chattr - /hacked/file
to remove the attributes then after that the reinstall of y
I have tried in vain to for a while to fix a problem with my
symbolic links. (They all appear to be orphaned, and blink red, but they
are not broken and work fine). Does anyone know if there is a kernel
module ore something of that sore that could be missing and thus cause
this problem or
Nope, the DIR_COLORS are as they should be at default :(
sub
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Listmail,
>
> > The link will blink red. If i open temp.lnk, all the contents from
> > temp.txt are properly displayed...
>
> Maybe some joker friend messed wit
Hi Listmail,
> The link will blink red. If i open temp.lnk, all the contents from
> temp.txt are properly displayed...
Maybe some joker friend messed with your DIR_COLORS?
Bye,
Leonard.
I am not certain if this is the problem or not. I have my drive split into
3 partitions. One is mounted as /home, and another as /var. However
everything is mounted and working properly, and the links appear to be
borken no matter where they are.
For example if I create a file say
temp.txt
the
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:36:18PM -0700, listmail wrote:
> On my Redhat 6.2 server all of my symbolic links are blinking red
> as if they are broken, but they seeom to otherwise be working normally.
> Any idea what might be causing this?
Have you tried to follow these links? I.e. have you
The color sequence prolly got flipped to where what used to be bad links
is now good links :)
Us Linux people are spoiled with our colorized ls... FreeBSD people, etc,
don't get pretty colors :P
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, listmail wrote:
> On my Redhat 6.2 server all of my symbolic links are bli
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:36:18PM -0700, listmail wrote:
| as if they are broken, but they seeom to otherwise be working normally.
| Any idea what might be causing this?
| sub
That's incredibly vague. Got a transcript of what is actually going wrong?
--
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PRO
I've had this happen - I'll try to give you a layman's best guess answer:
If the kernel interprets the path you are linking to as an invalid one
then you will get the red blinking, even if it works. For example, I run
ProFTPD on a server I have that hosts web sites. For security purposes I
chro
On my Redhat 6.2 server all of my symbolic links are blinking red
as if they are broken, but they seeom to otherwise be working normally.
Any idea what might be causing this?
sub
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman
I need yo create a symlink and am a bit confused. I am running Majordomo
1.94 and I get this error
"I get "sh: wrapper not available for sendmail programs" I need to do the
following to get it to work
but am not sure how to. I am running Redhat 5.0 and sendmail 8.8.7
You're on a system which uses
38 matches
Mail list logo
