On Wed, 27 May 1998, Michael George wrote:
> > If you want something to worry about, worry about GNU software still
> > using the idiosyncratic "info" format instead of switching to HTML
> > years ago.
>
> I agree. Maybe *I'm* in the dark ages, but I prefer "man" to "info". HTML
> would be a n
> If you want something to worry about, worry about GNU software still
> using the idiosyncratic "info" format instead of switching to HTML
> years ago.
I agree. Maybe *I'm* in the dark ages, but I prefer "man" to "info". HTML
would be a natural format for manual pages, and hardly more data tha
1998 6:54:14 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: The destruction of Linux as GNU PL
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> X-Mailer: TFS Gateway /221050358/221001241/221100223/221100233/
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Aut
On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 08:11:21PM +, Michael wrote:
> The reasson I'm asking is that, apparanty, more and more people
> are reccomending KDE and due to the license of the qt-libs one
> might fear that this will mean the end to linux as we know it, with the
> GNU Public Licence. Aren't there a
On Tue, 26 May 1998, Michael wrote:
>The reasson I'm asking is that, apparanty, more and more people
>are reccomending KDE and due to the license of the qt-libs one
>might fear that this will mean the end to linux as we know it, with the
It's understandably unfortunate that the Qt people's licen
On Tue, 26 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If i remember correctly, www.gnu.org has something about creating a
> replacement for qt that has the normal GNU public license.
Yeah, this is coming (kinda) in the form of GNOME, except GNOME is all qt
is plus a bunch more. When GNOME has matured a
All I can say w/o starting a huge asbestos shortage is to check
out www.gnome.org.
Chris
<- Visit Me At http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost ->
<-- For My Public PGP Key Visit http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost/pgp_key.txt -->
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVE
If i remember correctly, www.gnu.org has something about creating a
replacement for qt that has the normal GNU public license.
On Tue, 26 May 1998, Michael wrote:
> I'm a bit curious about what other linux-users think about KDE being
> built on non-free libs.
> Besides the GNOME-project, what o
Once upon a time Michael wrote:
>
> Hi folks !
>
> I'm a bit curious about what other linux-users think about KDE being
> built on non-free libs.
> The reasson I'm asking is that, apparanty, more and more people
> are reccomending KDE and due to the license of the qt-libs one
> might fear that t
On Tue, 26 May 1998, Michael wrote:
> Hi folks !
>
> I'm a bit curious about what other linux-users think about KDE being
> built on non-free libs.
> The reasson I'm asking is that, apparanty, more and more people
> are reccomending KDE and due to the license of the qt-libs one
> might fear that
Hi folks !
I'm a bit curious about what other linux-users think about KDE being
built on non-free libs.
The reasson I'm asking is that, apparanty, more and more people
are reccomending KDE and due to the license of the qt-libs one
might fear that this will mean the end to linux as we know it, wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
