On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, listmail wrote:
> Thanks for your help so far. I ran the utility, and it did show a number
> of errors on its sixth run through. However changing the ram seemed to fix
> the problem at first, but things soon were back to behaving badly. Bad
> motherboard? Any other suggestion
Thanks for your help so far. I ran the utility, and it did show a number
of errors on its sixth run through. However changing the ram seemed to fix
the problem at first, but things soon were back to behaving badly. Bad
motherboard? Any other suggestions?
thanks
sub
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Gordo
>
> In what way did you modify the kernel? I'm just curious. I assume you
> mean that you were able to boot from the installation media, and that it
> failed to boot post-install.
I used a boot disk (toms) to get into the system, used the chroot command
to make my mounted drive into the roo
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Tom's hardware did a good job explaining the differeces in the archectures.
> There are significant differences. To back up Gordon's comment I think it is
> interesting that AMD is getting the highspeeds and hav not even begun
> shipping the .18 micron ve
> Slight oops here. I mixed up Asus K7V and A7V. The A7V is a sockel
> motherboard, so it definitely has no problems with running Thunderbirds with
> the on die cache running at full clock speed. This problem only occurs in some
> slot Athlon motherboards (but probably not with the K7V).
>
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Statux wrote:
>
> > Well AMD's, etc will only ever be clones.. people need to face the music
>
> You might think so, but AMD is doing their thing fairly well. Athlons are
> cheaper than PIII's, and usually perform better. Notice that Athlons are
> av
Hello all,
> > > I have installed redhat 6.2 on an Asus a7v system, but have had
> > > nothing but troubles with it.
> >
> There seem to be some general problems with Athlon slot motherboards running
> Thunderbirds. On the other hand, I think this Asus board should run stab
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Statux wrote:
> Well AMD's, etc will only ever be clones.. people need to face the music
You might think so, but AMD is doing their thing fairly well. Athlons are
cheaper than PIII's, and usually perform better. Notice that Athlons are
available at higher clock speeds, and
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, listmail wrote:
> Several versions ago? Or are you referring to the kernel.
Yes, several kernel versions ago. I believe 2.2.12 fixed the issue to
which I was referring
(reference: http://www.linux.org.uk/VERSION/relnotes.2212.html)
> Redhat 6.2 would
> not boot on my thund
>
> Linux did have a problem booting on some Athlon systems several versions
> ago.
>
Several versions ago? Or are you referring to the kernel. Redhat 6.2 would
not boot on my thunderbird processor, and neither would the boot disk it
made for me. It hung trying to shut of the p3 serial number
Well AMD's, etc will only ever be clones.. people need to face the music
:)
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Statux wrote:
>
> > I see.. but if it was listed as the CPU in the subject.. what's up with
> > the rest of the original post? ;) I had to ask, that's al
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Statux wrote:
> I see.. but if it was listed as the CPU in the subject.. what's up with
> the rest of the original post? ;) I had to ask, that's all.
He was having trouble with an Athlon based system, and thought it might be
a compatibility issue (or at least that's what I g
I see.. but if it was listed as the CPU in the subject.. what's up with
the rest of the original post? ;) I had to ask, that's all.
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Statux wrote:
>
> > So where does "Thunderbird" come into all of this?
>
> thunderbird was the
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Statux wrote:
> So where does "Thunderbird" come into all of this?
thunderbird was the code name of the second generation of AMD's Athlon
chips before they were released. Now, they're branded as Athlon.
MSG
___
Redhat-list ma
So where does "Thunderbird" come into all of this?
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, listmail wrote:
> I have installed redhat 6.2 on an Asus a7v system, but have had
> nothing but troubles with it.
>After changing the kernel to 2.2.16-3 I can now boot, but compiling
> causes the system crash, somtim
Hello Gordon and listmail,
> > I have installed redhat 6.2 on an Asus a7v system, but have had
> > nothing but troubles with it.
>
> Your description sounds like bad RAM. The latest systems from both AMD
> and Intel have been very, very sensitive about the quality of RAM you
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, listmail wrote:
> I have installed redhat 6.2 on an Asus a7v system, but have had
> nothing but troubles with it.
Your description sounds like bad RAM. The latest systems from both AMD
and Intel have been very, very sensitive about the quality of RAM you
use. If you bo
listmail wrote:
> I have installed redhat 6.2 on an Asus a7v system, but have had
> nothing but troubles with it.
>After changing the kernel to 2.2.16-3 I can now boot, but compiling
> causes the system crash, somtimes due to segmentation faults other times
> do to an inability to write t
I have installed redhat 6.2 on an Asus a7v system, but have had
nothing but troubles with it.
After changing the kernel to 2.2.16-3 I can now boot, but compiling
causes the system crash, somtimes due to segmentation faults other times
do to an inability to write to the swip file. Gnome and
19 matches
Mail list logo
