How enable cache of Apache 1.3?

2003-10-15 Thread Salvador Santander
Hello, list, How can I enable the cahe of apache 1.3 ? I probed to uncomment the Cache... directives and uncoment the LoadModule and AddModule for poxy module, but in the directory /var/cache/httpd there's nothing. Help!! CacheRoot "/var/cahe/httpd" CacheSize 5 CacheGcInterval 4 Ca

Re: is there any apache 1.3.X rpm package fro redhat 8/9

2003-07-25 Thread Jason Dixon
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 22:23, Robert Mena wrote: > Hi, > > I need to use apache 1.3.X with my redhat 8/9 system. > Is there any rpm package available ? With the default distribution? No. That I've found online? No. I've tried to build one using the 1.3.27 src rpm for

is there any apache 1.3.X rpm package fro redhat 8/9

2003-07-25 Thread Robert Mena
Hi, I need to use apache 1.3.X with my redhat 8/9 system. Is there any rpm package available ? - rt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto

Red Hat 8.0 / Apache 1.3 Bandwith utilization problems

2003-02-28 Thread Rajiv Bhushan
line, and 30 Mb/s using a 100Mb/s line. Both the server and client are running stock out of the box Red Hat 8.0 The server is running Apache 1.3 If we use 'ttcp' on server and client, we are able to saturate both the 10Mb/s and 100 Mb/s line Any ideas as to what tuning parameters of

Red Hat 8.0 / Apache 1.3 Bandwith utilization problems

2003-02-27 Thread Rajiv Bhushan
line, and 30 Mb/s using a 100Mb/s line. Both the server and client are running stock out of the box Red Hat 8.0 The server is running Apache 1.3 If we use 'ttcp' on server and client, we are able to saturate both the 10Mb/s and 100 Mb/s line Any ideas as to what tuning parameters of

Re: apache 1.3?

2003-02-18 Thread kaya
how you did the apache/php install (RPM or source?) > What options did you compile/install with? > > /B > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 13:57 > Subject: apache 1.3? > > &

Re: apache 1.3?

2003-02-17 Thread David Busby
ary 17, 2003 13:57 Subject: apache 1.3? > hello, > i have deleted the httpd2 package coming with rh 8 > i have installed apache 1.3 and php 4.3 but my system does not send cookies. > i login to my system and next page, cookie is deleted. > i have tried with several codes. > any i

apache 1.3?

2003-02-17 Thread kaya
hello, i have deleted the httpd2 package coming with rh 8 i have installed apache 1.3 and php 4.3 but my system does not send cookies. i login to my system and next page, cookie is deleted. i have tried with several codes. any ideas? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Apache 1.3 and redirecting a virtual domain to a web page?

2002-10-25 Thread Joe Polk
002 22:44:48 -0700 Subject: Apache 1.3 and redirecting a virtual domain to a web page? > Anyone know how to set up Apache 1.3 (RH8.0) such that > > http://resume.daevid.com will serve the file > http://daevid.com/resume.shtml > > And while we're at it, how about > >

Apache 1.3 and redirecting a virtual domain to a web page?

2002-10-24 Thread Daevid Vincent
Anyone know how to set up Apache 1.3 (RH8.0) such that http://resume.daevid.com will serve the file http://daevid.com/resume.shtml And while we're at it, how about http://foo.daevid.com to go to http://daevid.com/foo/ This one I think I can do with a regular like any others, but I h

RE: Virtual Hosting in Apache 1.3

1998-06-22 Thread Paul Pettit
> From: Bench [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 19, 1998 7:21 PM > To: Redhat List > Subject: Virtual Hosting in Apache 1.3 > > > > I can't figure out why this doesn't work: > > NameVirtualHost 203.176.5.130 > > > ServerA

Virtual Hosting in Apache 1.3

1998-06-19 Thread Bench
I can't figure out why this doesn't work: NameVirtualHost 203.176.5.130 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /home/httpd/virtualsites/caylabne ServerName www.caylabne.com.ph ErrorLog /var/log/httpd/caylabne-error_log TransferLog /var/log/httpd/caylabne-access_log I know NameVirtualHost

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-16 Thread David S Edwards
At 03:48 AM 3/16/98 GMT, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >not so with me. NT was halfway stable before 4.0, but not anymore. Yes I would have to agree there. I had a mail server with 2000 users that ran on NT 3.51 and Post.Office. That thing ran solid for 2 years and 2 months before we

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread jdickins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I realize this is a Linux list server, but I prefer to play fair. >I've been running NT ever since version 3.1 and it has NEVER crashed >on me without a good reason, and a solution readily available. All in >all my NT has been stable as a rock. I believe people badmout

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Paul Fontenot
MSCE... On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Paul Fontenot wrote: > > > > How old are you, kid? > > > Is this really necessary? If it is please take it off the list. > > As far as NT goes, I am an MCSE (cuz everybody has to eat...) and i agree > NT is fairly powerful but, not as flexible as UNIX. > > -Paul

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Paul Fontenot
> > How old are you, kid? > Is this really necessary? If it is please take it off the list. As far as NT goes, I am an MCSE (cuz everybody has to eat...) and i agree NT is fairly powerful but, not as flexible as UNIX. -Paul -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIS

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Vadim Israilevich
-Original Message- From: Dave Wreski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, March 15, 1998 5:43 PM Subject: Re: Apache 1.3 > >> I realize this is a Linux list server, but I prefer to play fair. >> I've been running

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Dave Wreski
> I realize this is a Linux list server, but I prefer to play fair. > I've been running NT ever since version 3.1 and it has NEVER crashed > on me without a good reason, and a solution readily available. All in > all my NT has been stable as a rock. I believe people badmouth NT > because they e

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Vadim Israilevich
TECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, March 15, 1998 10:25 AM Subject: Re: Apache 1.3 >Good morning > >I switched from NT-4.0 to Redhat 4.2 about 1 1/2 years ago... >and (other than minor delays caused by my personal learning curve) >I have had w

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Rita Meng
I am trying to get name based virtual hosts to work. I want all to have the same IP address. Do I have to upgrade to httpd (apache) 1.3? I am confused because one reply said yes and one said no - just leave NameVirtualHost directive out of http.conf and leave rest of virtual server stuff there

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Hank
On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Mark Rogers wrote: > > > Rita Meng wrote: > > > Is anyone using Apache 1.3 for Linux? I have Httpd 1.2.5 on Redhat. I want > > to do virtual hosts but when I put the NameVirtualHost directive in > > httpd.conf, it is invalid. The Apache doc

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-15 Thread Hank
og in mud) On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Mark Rogers wrote: > > > Rita Meng wrote: > > > Is anyone using Apache 1.3 for Linux? I have Httpd 1.2.5 on Redhat. I want > > to do virtual hosts but when I put the NameVirtualHost directive in > > httpd.conf, it is

Re: Apache 1.3

1998-03-14 Thread Mark Rogers
Rita Meng wrote: > Is anyone using Apache 1.3 for Linux? I have Httpd 1.2.5 on Redhat. I want > to do virtual hosts but when I put the NameVirtualHost directive in > httpd.conf, it is invalid. The Apache doc says that it is only valid for > Apache 1.3. But the Apache site also says

Apache 1.3

1998-03-14 Thread Rita Meng
Is anyone using Apache 1.3 for Linux? I have Httpd 1.2.5 on Redhat. I want to do virtual hosts but when I put the NameVirtualHost directive in httpd.conf, it is invalid. The Apache doc says that it is only valid for Apache 1.3. But the Apache site also says that 1.3 is in beta. But my httpd.conf