On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:49:38PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> The SUID bit has nothing to do with not being able to copy the file.
> Users can't copy /usr/bin/passwd because they don't have read access to
> the file. That doesn't quite meet the criteria of the original request,
> which was t
The SUID bit has nothing to do with not being able to copy the file.
Users can't copy /usr/bin/passwd because they don't have read access to
the file. That doesn't quite meet the criteria of the original request,
which was to restrict copying while allowing users to read the contents
of the file
, and don't just output the file to the screen in a
> way that can be redirected, you have prevented casual copying.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Canary
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 10:11 AM
&
can be modified/altered
to any extent.
-Original Message-
From: David Talkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:36 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: deny copying files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Hamm wrote:
>
>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Hamm wrote:
>
>>it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be
>>see the contents.
>
>Woops sorry read that post wrong this prevents files from being altered. It
>will allow copying the file.
Figure that one out, and
Or simply chmod 744 as owner.
-
Subject: RE: deny copying files
Woops sorry read that post wrong this prevents files from being altered. It
will allow copying the file.
try "> chattr +i " as superuser
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinf
Woops sorry read that post wrong this prevents files from being altered. It
will allow copying the file.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hamm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:19 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: deny copying files
try "&
try "> chattr +i " as superuser
-Original Message-
From: Lewi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: deny copying files
it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be
see the c
On 18:51 23 Feb 2002, Timothy Lee Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I think it would be great to know how to copy-inhibit files, if anything just
| for the sake of knowledge.
To copy inhibit files you just remove read permission. Works every time!
Seriously, that's all there is.
--
Cameron Sim
I think it would be great to know how to copy-inhibit files, if anything just
for the sake of knowledge. With Novell servers, you can copy-inhibit files,
which is great to help protect files installed on the network.
On Saturday 23 February 2002 05:46 pm, you wrote:
> On 23:09 23 Feb 2002,
On 23:09 23 Feb 2002, Lewi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:58:59AM -0500, rpjday wrote:
| > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
| > > it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can
| > > be see the contents.
| > not likely, since if someone can list the
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be see the
>contents.
>
> any suggestions?
If it's an executable, you can change the program so that it will only run
from a particular directory.
---
n in a
way that can be redirected, you have prevented casual copying.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Canary
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: deny copying files
Depends on what your tryi
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> i think so too, but just an idea if that possible if just restrict cp command
> to read file.
You could always make cp a non-user executable command, and allow access
with sudo. Course, that breaks most things...
___
Depends on what your trying to keep in tact. Cat file1 > file2 will
copy all contents but the file image and timestamp has changed. So if
your using any sort of original verification schemes you could detect a
illegal copy. However, if your trying to prevent people from simply own
the file on t
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:58:59AM -0500, rpjday wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
>
> > it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can
> > be see the contents.
> >
> > any suggestions?
>
> not likely, since if someone can list the contents, they can always
> jus
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be
> see the contents.
If I can view the contents, I can copy it.
cat file1 > file2
Hey presto, copied without using cp, and only by viewing it.
__
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Lewi wrote:
> it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can
> be see the contents.
>
> any suggestions?
not likely, since if someone can list the contents, they can always
just redirect the output to a destination file of their choice.
rday
it that possible to restrict file to not able be copying but still can be see the
contents.
any suggestions?
--
ichtus
--
Lewi Supranata .K
ICQ: 50643061
msg72651/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
19 matches
Mail list logo
