the latest firewall conf already but there is one question remaining:
With a port scan with nmap -sS TCP SYN ip-address. Every port will give
filtered is it possible to hide the port totally so no syn will be
returned by the system.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 15:14 9/3/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Okay, you're doing a bunch of stuff with which I am unfamiliar (especially
that --state NEW,INVALID stuff), but there are a couple of things that I
think could help you...
Please allow me to suggest that you both take a good look at
At 07:16 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I have a stupid question for you. When I installed 7.2 (later 7.3) I chose
ipchains rather than iptables so that I could use my old 6.x firewall. What
must I do to switch to iptables?
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. You can always tell a
Hi,
Thanks i modified my firewall now it works for me. I made the following
entries:
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] # Accept all forwarded packets. In my
case there
is no NAT, so this is ok.
:INPUT DROP [0:0] # Drop all incoming packets.
Hi,
Thanks i modified my firewall now it works for me. I made the following
entries:
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] # Accept all forwarded packets. In my case there
is no NAT, so this is ok.
:INPUT DROP [0:0] # Drop all incoming packets.
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] # Accept all outgoing packets. So no
I need FTP my clients need to upload there webpages because the server is a
part of a hosting company. I don't want to give anonymous access to anyone.
Every user is know to me, and is chrooted to her home directorie they can't
come outside this directory even with a symlink access is denied. And
At 21:50 9/4/2003 +0200, you wrote:
I need FTP my clients need to upload there webpages because the server is a
part of a hosting company. I don't want to give anonymous access to anyone.
Every user is know to me, and is chrooted to her home directorie they can't
come outside this directory even
Hi,
I'm using redhat 9.0 and the latest webmin. Now i want to configure the
firewall that the ip addresses 213.132.174.75, 127.0.0.1, 80.242.234.70 and
62.131.19.121 with webmin only can access port 1 tcp/udp. I only get one
ip address working not all. Any body any ideas?
--
redhat-list
Hi,
I'm using redhat 9.0 and the latest webmin. Now i want to configure the
firewall that the ip addresses 213.132.174.75, 127.0.0.1, 80.242.234.70
and
62.131.19.121 with webmin only can access port 1 tcp/udp. I only get
one
ip address working not all. Any body any ideas?
What is the
My conf looks like this:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.2.7a on Sun Jul 13 21:22:53 2003
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [38:2291]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [10:1360]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [10:1360]
COMMIT
# Completed on Sun Jul 13 21:22:53 2003
# Generated by iptables-save v1.2.7a on Sun Jul 13 21:22:53
At 15:14 9/3/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Okay, you're doing a bunch of stuff with which I am unfamiliar (especially
that --state NEW,INVALID stuff), but there are a couple of things that I
think could help you...
Please allow me to suggest that you both take a good look at Shorewall
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 15:14 9/3/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Okay, you're doing a bunch of stuff with which I am unfamiliar (especially
that --state NEW,INVALID stuff), but there are a couple of things that I
think could help you...
Please allow me to suggest that you
At 21:44 9/3/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I really appreciate the suggestion, and I've seen shorewall mentioned here
before. However, I've got other reasons that dictate that I learn the ins
and outs of iptables and NAT, down to the nitty-gritty details. *grin*
OK... Shorewall as a learning tool, then.
13 matches
Mail list logo