RE: hdparam (was Re: Linux Network Performance Slower Than NT, please help)

2000-11-04 Thread Charles Galpin
pretty happy. > > Jamin W. Collins > > -Original Message- > From: Charles Galpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: hdparam (was Re: Linux Network Performance Slower Than NT, > pleas

RE: hdparam (was Re: Linux Network Performance Slower Than NT, please help)

2000-11-04 Thread Jamin Collins
, I'm feeling pretty happy. Jamin W. Collins -Original Message- From: Charles Galpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: hdparam (was Re: Linux Network Performance Slower Than NT, please help) Thanks to you and

Re: hdparam (was Re: Linux Network Performance Slower Than NT, please help)

2000-11-03 Thread Charles Galpin
Thanks to you and Scott Sharkey for responding. I'm not trying to play dumb or anything. I realize it's newer technology which has higher maximums. I guess I'm really just surprised that a controller/disk combination which is supposed to have a maximum rate of 80MB/sec only gets 13 MB/sec in prac

hdparam (was Re: Linux Network Performance Slower Than NT, please help)

2000-11-03 Thread Doug McGarrett
Charles posted the following, which I have truncated for brevity: Quote on: /snip/ But, what really surprised me was the difference in beformance between my two scsi systems - one brnad new, and the other not much more than a year old. "old" scsi setup: adaptec 2940U2W 2 x 9GB IBM (?deskstar? DD