-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott wrote:
|>Calling spamassassin directly is very load intensive. Consider running spamd
|>and having procmail call spamc (using dropprivs). The difference is
phenominal.
|
|
| Yes, I was using spamc.
Yikes.
|>Also consider updating your server
Rick,
Excellent! I have RH 8.0
spamassin/squirrelmail/nutella/Samba-PDC/LDAP/DNS/DHCP etc...
with a load average below 0.1 on a XP 1700+ with over 300 users.
Had to recompile a few things but worth the wait.
Great performance at a gr8 price!
update today!
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> H
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Rick Johnson wrote:
> This is a procmail bug - update procmail to 3.23 or later (Red Hat's 3.22-5
> and 3.22-7 seems to cover it)
I have the procmail 3.22.5 rpm for 7.3, but found another problem on my
system preventing me from updating, working on that one now.
> :0 fhw
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott St. John wrote:
| Two questions. If I run Spam Assassin I get user mailboxes with the F
| missing from
| From and they can not download mail, I fix their files and they are
| ok. QPopper
| recommends running in server mode to prevent this pro
I have a new IBM Netfinity Server with Red Hat 7.2 running
Sendmail/QPopper/WebMail
and was running Spam Assassin. The box is a dual P3-600 with a gig of ram
and a raid
5 controller for the disks. The main job of the machine is to deliver mail
to 2,300 email
accounts.
Two questions. If I run
