On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:18:05PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
> Yes, it is really the end user's fault.
Kinda. But to be practical, in a world where "my mom" is starting to
subscribe to mailing lists, the real bug here is to have a vacation
program not ignore the "Precedence: bulk" that every sens
At 07:54 AM 11/16/02, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Ed,
> In any case, mailman does have options to detect infinite loops like
> this but even the current production releases miss a few. In the beta
> releases, the detection is supposed to be better and more cases will be
> caught.
Coul
>
> ... The answer is simple: DON'T USE AUTORESPONDERS.
>
I don't think so. Any rule that relies on 100% conformance is not going to
work well
enough. As demonstrated by this episode. It only takes one subscriber out
of this rather large list to forget and ... here we go again.
Is it poss
What are you a Troll? D'uh! The answer is simple: DON'T USE
AUTORESPONDERS.
He isn't banned, he's just unsubscribed, but I would put a 30-day hold
on him resubscribing. He should be more careful w/ lists, if you know
you get lists, it is your responsibility to make sure that your rules
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 01:54:20PM +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
> > In any case, mailman does have options to detect infinite loops like
> > this but even the current production releases miss a few. In the beta
> > releases, the detection is supposed to be better and more cases will be
Hello Ed,
> In any case, mailman does have options to detect infinite loops like
> this but even the current production releases miss a few. In the beta
> releases, the detection is supposed to be better and more cases will be
> caught.
Could you maybe explain how this would be implemented? A m
Richard Tricoche wrote:
What happens when Mr. Petrie comes in Monday morning to check his latest
posts on the mailing list and sees he has been banned? What happens
when someone else on the list stays home one day and forgets to manually
unsubscribe to the mailing list for that day?
Well, con
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:31:05PM -0500, Richard Tricoche wrote:
> Is it really the end users fault for not remembering to visit the website
> and click the link to unsubscribe for the day...
Yes.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscr
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:31:05PM -0500, Richard Tricoche wrote:
>
> Is it really the end users fault for not remembering to visit the website
> and click the link to unsubscribe for the day... or is it the mailing list's
> administrator's fault for allowing this type of spam to work it's way
> t
Richard Tricoche wrote:
What happens when Mr. Petrie comes in Monday morning to check his latest
posts on the mailing list and sees he has been banned? What happens
when someone else on the list stays home one day and forgets to manually
unsubscribe to the mailing list for that day?
I don't t
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Richard Tricoche wrote:
> What happens when Mr. Petrie comes in Monday morning to check his latest
> posts on the mailing list and sees he has been banned?
oh, geez. he hasn't been banned. he's been unsubscribed. he can
always resubscribe later.
rday
--
redhat-list
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Richard Tricoche wrote:
> What happens when Mr. Petrie comes in Monday morning to check his latest
> posts on the mailing list and sees he has been banned? What happens when
> someone else on the list stays home one day and forgets to manually
> unsubscribe to the mailing lis
Title: RE: mr petrie is history - [[but should he really be?]]
What happens when Mr. Petrie comes in Monday morning to check his latest posts on the mailing list and sees he has been banned? What happens when someone else on the list stays home one day and forgets to manually unsubscribe to
13 matches
Mail list logo
