I would argue a different point... html allows better formatting, and as
such can give you emails that actually look quite nice, as well as
allowing for coloured text and images. however i think the general
approach made to html emails is wrong... html clients tend to allow
scripting, whereas from
Thanks :) I try to always be as good a poster as I can.
Html seems, as per the replies, just what I thought it
is in e mail, useless.
I'm glad I never bothered.
Many thanks for your replies, much appreciated.
On Friday 08 November 2002 12:42 pm, Saul Arias wrote:
> This is one of the best po
On 08 Nov 2002 13:42:04 -0500, Saul Arias wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 12:21, Craig Iffelberg wrote:
>>
>> I thought html was just for web pages.
>
>This is one of the best posts I've seen on this list this year.
Craig gets a ribbon. :)
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 12:21, Craig Iffelberg wrote:
> Hey all, sorry about the newb question, I have always
> used just text in e mail as far as I know, so why are
> there mailers that use html in them?
>
> I thought html was just for web pages.
>
> ?confused??
This is one of the best po
Craig Iffelberg wrote:
Hey all, sorry about the newb question, I have always
used just text in e mail as far as I know, so why are
there mailers that use html in them?
I thought html was just for web pages.
?confused??
Because HTML allows more formatting options. Personally I prefer
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 12:21, Craig Iffelberg wrote:
> Hey all, sorry about the newb question, I have always
> used just text in e mail as far as I know, so why are
> there mailers that use html in them?
>
> I thought html was just for web pages.
>
Listen, when you get spam you might notice a cou
Hey all, sorry about the newb question, I have always
used just text in e mail as far as I know, so why are
there mailers that use html in them?
I thought html was just for web pages.
?confused??
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=un
