EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:27 AM
> > To: Willem Brown
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: sendmail secondary relay gives user unknown after up2date
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > Thanks sofar.
> > It worked, but now i have an o
Hello Willem,
Willem van der Walt wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks sofar.
> It worked, but now i have an open relay.
According to the README, sendmail, by default, does not permit
relaying. I'm not sure if this still apply after Red Hat packaged
it. How did you test it to see if it was an open relay?
To rela
> -Original Message-
> From: Willem van der Walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:27 AM
> To: Willem Brown
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sendmail secondary relay gives user unknown after up2date
>
>
> Hi,
> Thanks sofar.
Hi,
Thanks sofar.
It worked, but now i have an open relay.
I had a modified local-host-names file that was modified by
the update.
It had the comment that it made the entry
top.health.gov.za
health.gov.za
from the obsoleted /etc/sendmail.cw file
regards, Willem
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Willem Brown w
Hello Willem,
What does the /etc/mail/mailertable and /etc/mail/local-host-names
look like?
If I'm not mistaken, the local-host-names should not contain
health.gov.za but mailertable should contain somthing like
the following.
health.gov.za smtp:mail.health.gov.za
You need to run the makemap comm
Hi,
The machine top.health.gov.za 196.15.225.8
is the secondary relay for our domain, health.gov.za.
It worked fine running rh 7.1.
I ran up2 date on it to update the sendmail after the 3 March
exploit became known.
I kept the old files as is in /etc/mail.
It now behaves as follows:
When mail is
