Re: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference

2003-06-16 Thread Scarletdown
On 16 Jun 2003 at 9:00, Edward Dekkers wrote: Scarletdown wrote: Would rebooting both 98 machines help, perhaps? Possibly, you could also tell samba to be the master browser for the workgroup. That might help. It did turn out to just be a matter of waiting. Not long after I posted

Re: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference

2003-06-16 Thread Marcos de Souza Trazzini
Neighborhood, only the 2 98 boxes and the router. If it helps any, here is what the smb.conf file looks like: [global] workgroup = BUSHYTAIL guest account = nobody keep alive = 30 os level = 2 server string = RedHat Linux 5.2 Test System - Build-0003 hosts allow = 192.168.1 127

Re: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference

2003-06-15 Thread Edward Dekkers
] Subject: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here? I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO router. Problem is, this system is not showing up in Network

Re: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference

2003-06-15 Thread AragonX
: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here? I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO router. Problem is, this system is not showing up in Network Neighborhood

Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference

2003-06-14 Thread Scarletdown
, here is what the smb.conf file looks like: [global] workgroup = BUSHYTAIL guest account = nobody keep alive = 30 os level = 2 server string = RedHat Linux 5.2 Test System - Build-0003 hosts allow = 192.168.1 127. log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50

RE: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference

2003-06-14 Thread Roger Harrington
You don't have a period between the 1 and 127 in your hosts.allow line -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scarletdown Sent: Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference Can

RE: Samba Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference

2003-06-14 Thread Scarletdown
Setup Problems - smb.conf Posted For Reference Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong here? I'm trying to get a Linux box set up with Samba so I can share files with a pair of Win-98 systems and my FreeSCO router. Problem is, this system is not showing up in Network

smb.conf

2002-10-22 Thread Roger Schmeits
If I set the parameter in the [global] section to the following: read only = no writeable = no will the parameter propagate thru all shares; around two hundreds shares. Unless otherwise stated i.e. per share level? Roger -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe

RE: smb.conf

2002-10-22 Thread Michael S. Dunsavage
if you put read only = yes writeable = yes in each share, that should supercede I believe. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list-admin;redhat.com]On Behalf Of Roger Schmeits Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: smb.conf

Re: smb.conf

2002-10-22 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 09:25, Roger Schmeits wrote: If I set the parameter in the [global] section to the following: read only = no writeable = no will the parameter propagate thru all shares; around two hundreds shares. Unless otherwise stated i.e. per share level? Yes it will. Global

Re: smb.conf

2002-10-22 Thread Roger Schmeits
to the smb.conf. If it is too restrictive I can then open it up as needed. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: smb.conf

2002-10-22 Thread Gordon Messmer
directory and trying to take a very restrictive approach to the smb.conf. If it is too restrictive I can then open it up as needed. I'm not confused by wanting to make everything read only, just by why you'd set read only = no (which makes everything writable) and then set writable = no (which

RE: using @group_name in smb.conf

2002-06-06 Thread Chad and Doria Skinner
PROTECTED] Subject: using @group_name in smb.conf I need to add a group of users access to a file share that I am sharing via samba. In smb.conf I am using something similar to; [accts] comment = Accounts Dept Share path = /usr/local/share/accounts valid users = @accounts public

Re: using @group_name in smb.conf

2002-06-06 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06-Jun-2002/15:11 +1000, Darryl Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to add a group of users access to a file share that I am sharing via samba. [snip] The valid users line says who can access this share. I know the @accounts = the accounts

using @group_name in smb.conf

2002-06-05 Thread Darryl Harvey
I need to add a group of users access to a file share that I am sharing via samba. In smb.conf I am using something similar to; [accts] comment = Accounts Dept Share path = /usr/local/share/accounts valid users = @accounts public = no writable = yes printable = no create