Dear Benjamin,
Thanks for your input. We believe that relationship between an object and an
organization should be 1-to-1, one organization ID with just one role.
1-to-many is an exception for the organization extension. Indeed that is our
concern, "the multiple examples may be overkill". Many t
Dear Benjamin,
Please see my feedbacks below.
Regards,
Linlin
Linlin Zhou
> > --
> > COMMENT:
> > --
> > Section 4.3
> >
> >The status of the organizati
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, at 15:15, James Galvin wrote:
> By now you should have seen the draft agenda for IETF103. On it you
> will see 8 requests for adopting new documents as working group
> milestones.
Note in passing that it may not be so easy, at least to search in mailboxes
because the mess
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, at 21:21, Andrew Newton wrote:
> Perhaps priority should be given to those I-Ds with running code.
This is one of the point I mage in my July message:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/DuitffLvC4Q5RR32AnN1yDEUEYg
Running code is useful/needed but maybe too high
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 19:31, Mack, Justin wrote:
> I see that most attributes are shared between domains in the bundle,
> such as assigned nameservers. Does this mean that DS/DNSKEY information
> is also shared between these domains?
Not possible for DS data as the DS digest value is computed
Dear Benjamin,
"A client MUST NOT alter status values set by the server." The client can set
"clientLinkProhibited" but can not alter "ok". "ok" and "clientLinkProhibited"
can coexist.
Regards,
Linlin
Linlin Zhou
From: Benjamin Kaduk
Date: 2018-10-31 11:23
To: Linlin Zhou
CC: Eric Rescorla;
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:25 PM Linlin Zhou wrote:
> Dear Eric,
> Please see my feedbaks below.
>
> Regards,
> Linlin
> --
> Linlin Zhou
>
> --
>>> DISCUSS:
>>>
Trimming to just one potentially problematic suggestion...
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:25:42AM +0800, Linlin Zhou wrote:
>
> Linlin Zhou
> --
> DISCUSS:
> --
[...
Dear Eric,
Please see my feedbaks below.
Regards,
Linlin
Linlin Zhou
--
DISCUSS:
--
Rich version of this review at:
https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/
From: Mack, Justin
Date: 2018-10-31 02:31
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-06.txt - Impact
of DNSSEC?
>Greetings REGEXT,
>
>What is the impact of DNSSEC on bundled domain names in this specification?
>
I think that there has no direct impact.
>I
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:16:05AM +0800, Linlin Zhou wrote:
> Dear Benjamin,
> I've included my feedbacks inline and removed the clarified items.
>
> Regards,
> Linlin
>
>
> Linlin Zhou
>
> > --
> > DISCUSS:
> > --
Thank you all.
Regards,
Linlin
Linlin Zhou
From: Martin Thomson
Date: 2018-10-31 06:46
To: Adam Roach
CC: zhoulinlin; regext
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-org extensibility comments
Already done.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:11 AM Adam Roach wrote:
>
> Thanks, Martin. Can you follow up
Already done.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:11 AM Adam Roach wrote:
>
> Thanks, Martin. Can you follow up with IANA to let them know that your
> concerns have been satisfied?
>
> /a
>
> On 10/30/18 4:54 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > Thanks Linlin, that helps. If these are following existing patterns,
Greetings REGEXT,
What is the impact of DNSSEC on bundled domain names in this specification?
I see that most attributes are shared between domains in the bundle,
such as assigned nameservers. Does this mean that DS/DNSKEY information
is also shared between these domains?
As a DNS administrato
Thanks, Martin. Can you follow up with IANA to let them know that your
concerns have been satisfied?
/a
On 10/30/18 4:54 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
Thanks Linlin, that helps. If these are following existing patterns,
that works for me.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:43 PM Linlin Zhou wrote:
Dear
Thanks Linlin, that helps. If these are following existing patterns,
that works for me.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:43 PM Linlin Zhou wrote:
>
> Dear Martin,
> Thank you for your review. Please see my feedbacks inline.
>
> Regards,
> Linlin
>
> Linlin Zhou
>
>
> Fro
16 matches
Mail list logo
