Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai Path Forward

+1 on cardinality of one From: regext on behalf of Dmitry Belyavsky Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 7:03 AM To: Gould, James Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai Path Forward Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please d

Re: [regext] OK, What Next? (was RDAP Extensions Approach Analysis v2)

Good Afternoon, Thanks Jim and Rick, I agree that option B looks like the best collaborative option. Thanks Roger From: regext on behalf of Rick Wilhelm Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 11:37 AM To: Gould, James ; mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it ; shollenbeck=40veris

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04

+1 From: regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 7:55 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 You don't often get email from ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org. Learn why this is impor

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

+1 From: regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 1:55 PM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Notice: This email is from an external sender. This is a special second working group

Re: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

+1 From: regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 1:55 PM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [regext] 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis Notice: This email is from an external sender. This is a special second working group

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-03

+1 From: regext on behalf of Tobias Sattler Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 6:15 AM To: James Galvin Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-03 Notice: This email is from an external sender. +1 > On 2.

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-03

+1 From: regext on behalf of Tobias Sattler Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 6:09 AM To: James Galvin Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-03 Notice: This email is from an external sender. +1 > O

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03

+1 From: regext on behalf of Tobias Sattler Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 6:23 AM To: James Galvin Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-03 Notice: This email is from an external sender. +1 > O

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

+1 From: regext on behalf of Mario Loffredo Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 12:49 AM To: Antoin Verschuren ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Notice: This email is from an external sender. +1 Mario Il 18/09

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

+1 From: regext on behalf of Mario Loffredo Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 12:49 AM To: Antoin Verschuren ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis Notice: This email is from an external sender. +1 Mario Il 18/09

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis

+1 From: regext on behalf of Mario Loffredo Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 9:23 AM To: Antoin Verschuren ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis Notice: This email is from an external sender. I support adoption. Mar

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis

+1 From: regext on behalf of Mario Loffredo Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 9:23 AM To: Antoin Verschuren ; regext Subject: Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis Notice: This email is from an external sender. I support adoption. Mar

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-yee-regext-simple-registration-reporting

+1 on adoption From: regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 8:36 AM To: regext Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-yee-regext-simple-registration-reporting Notice: This email is from an external sender. Dear working group,

Re: [regext] [Ext] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

+1 Scott. From: regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 12:53 PM To: barryle...@computer.org ; rwilton=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org Cc: Gould, James ; regext-cha...@ietf.org ; i...@ietf.org ; gustavo.loz...@icann.org ; regext@ietf.o

Re: [regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or OPTIONAL?

Good Morning, Thanks Scott, I do believe this suggestion would add clarity and is appropriate. Thanks Roger From: regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 8:34 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [regext] RDAP Event Members: REQUIRED or

Re: [regext] milestones for recently adopted documents

Good Morning, Thanks for your review and comments Patrick. For the questions you brought up: DDoS/SRS down - This draft is not intended to support emergency notifications. - Draft will be updated to include language describing type and name attributes. - Draft will be updated to match text

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec

Good Afternoon, As I have mentioned previously, this informational draft has quite a few policy dependencies built into it that are currently being reviewed and will be changed by ICANN. The authors have addressed several of these potential policy issues but there are some that still exist (e

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-sattler-epp-registry-maintenance

+1 to add to milestones. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 8:51 AM To: regext Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-sattler-epp-registry-maintenance Notice: This email is from an external sender. This is a formal adopti

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-gould-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer

+1 to add to milestones. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 8:51 AM To: regext Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-gould-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer Notice: This email is from an external sender. This is a formal a

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces

+1 to add to milestones. -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 8:51 AM To: regext Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces Notice: This email is from an external sender. This is a f

[regext] Registry-Registrar Reporting

Good Afternoon, I took an action item out of the Interim REGEXT Meeting held 03NOV2019 in regards to the Registry-Registrar Reporting discussion. We discussed, for almost two hours, several proposals around standardizing Registry-Registrar Reports. Roughly there were three proposals: * C

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Wednesday, October 23, 2019 5:40 PM To: Roger D Carney Cc: The IESG ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Notice: This email is from an external sender. On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 12:25:23PM -0700, Benjamin Kad

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-20.txt

Good Morning, This should be the final edit, just to add normative reference to XML Schema. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:11 AM To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: [regex

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Good Morning, Thanks to both of you!! Revision 20 coming with updated references. Thanks Roger From: Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 6:10 AM To: r...@cert.org; Roger D Carney ; i...@ietf.org; regext@ietf.org Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regex

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-19.txt

Good Afternoon, One more update, to address IESG reviews and comments. All changes were just textual for clarity/correctness except one, a non-breaking schema change, requiring the name attribute for the command. Enjoy and have a great weekend!! Thanks Roger -Original Message

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-01 draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-01

+1 From: regext On Behalf Of Joseph Yee Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 2:29 PM To: Jothan Frakes Cc: Owen Smigelski ; James Galvin ; Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-01 draft-ietf-regext-dnrd-objects-mapping-01 Notice: This em

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with COMMENT)

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Eric, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> Sent:

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Roman, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.org>>

Re: [regext] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Yoav, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> Sent:

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Benjamin, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker mailto:nore...@ietf.or

Re: [regext] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: (with COMMENT)

Good Morning, Thanks for your comments Warren, please see my responses below, a new revision will be published shortly to address issues brought up in this latest round of comments. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker Sent: Sunday, September

Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16

: Roger D Carney Cc: Carlos Pignataro ; ops-...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees@ietf.org; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16 Notice: This email is from an external sender. Thanks for making the updates, Roger. I do

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-17.txt

Good Afternoon, One last draft to address AD reviews and comments. No scheme changes just verbiage cleanup for an easier more concise read. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 3:06 PM To: i-d-annou...@ietf

Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16

Good Morning, Thank you for your follow-up Carlos, please see my responses below. A new version of the draft will be published shortly and will address all of the review comments that needed edits. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) Sent: Wedn

Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16

Good Morning, Thank you for your comments Carlos, please see my responses below. A new version of the draft will be published shortly and will address all of the review comments that needed edits. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Carlos Pignataro via Datatracker Sent

Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16

Good Morning, Thank you for your comments Stewart, please see my responses below. A new version of the draft will be published shortly and will address all of the review comments that needed edits. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker mailto:no

Re: [regext] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16

Good Morning, Thank you for your comments Yoav, please see my responses below. A new version of the draft will be published shortly and will address all of the review comments that needed edits. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker Sent: Saturday,

Re: [regext] on RDAP milestones

Good Morning, Thanks George, I like this thought process. One additional thing I would like to add is the discussions of privacy at a higher level. For those that did not attend the Plenary Wednesday, there were some good privacy presentations and shows that privacy is an issue that needs to

Re: [regext] on RDAP milestones

+1 to extensions of these milestones -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Wilhelm, Richard Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 7:49 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [regext] on RDAP milestones Notice: This email is from an external sender. Capturing/elaborating on my comments at the m

Re: [regext] on jcard and jscontact migration

Good Evening, +1 on the transition thoughts, thanks Marc for delving a bit deeper on this topic. Just wanted to make one comment/clarification on one of Andy's questions: "Are there any registries willing to step up and say they'll deploy RDAP if we move to JSContact? Just wanted to add cl

Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-login-security

+1 -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 8:19 AM To: gal...@elistx.com; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-login-security Notice: This email is from an external sender. > -Original Message

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2019JUN11) Notes

Meeting minutes from our quick Interim Meeting on June 11th, enjoy! See everyone in a few weeks. Meeting started at 11:04 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney (GoDaddy), Gordon Dick (Nominet), Joseph Yee (Afilias) Agenda 1. Reporting Repository

Re: [regext] Registration Protocols Extensions (regext) WG Virtual Meeting: 2019-06-11 CHANGED

Good Morning, Thanks for the nudge Patrick, I had the minutes in my drafts folder from right after the meeting and forgot to get them out before taking off for a couple weeks. I will get these notes cleaned up and sent out today. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2019JUN11

ttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-dataset/> fit in). Thanks Roger From: Roger D Carney Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 9:07 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: REGEXT Interim Meeting 2019MAY30 Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Thursday May 30t

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2019MAY30

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Thursday May 30th at 16:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around Reporting. Agenda 1. Reporting Repository/Struct

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16.txt

Good Afternoon, Per AD comments and list comments I have posted revision 16 to address all comments. Here is the change log for revision 16: Updated per AD review and list comments: several grammar corrections; clarification text added to section 3.4.3 and 3.5; and a schema update for cons

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: Proposed Milestones for the next year

+1 on the milestones -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of James Galvin Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 3:26 PM To: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: Proposed Milestones for the next year As discussed at our last meeting at IETF104 Prague, we nee

Re: [regext] [gtld-tech] EPDP recommendations and EPP

ace). Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 9:55 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] [gtld-tech] EPDP recommendations and EPP On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, at 16:22, Roger D Carney wrote: > Thanks for the comments Patrick. I agree

Re: [regext] [gtld-tech] EPDP recommendations and EPP

xt] [gtld-tech] EPDP recommendations and EPP On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, at 15:39, Roger D Carney wrote: > I think I am in agreement with most people on this, that option 3 (or > C, whatever it is called) is the best short term solution “define a > "convention" that allows the and el

Re: [regext] [gtld-tech] EPDP recommendations and EPP

Good Morning, I think I am in agreement with most people on this, that option 3 (or C, whatever it is called) is the best short term solution “define a "convention" that allows the and elements to contain placeholder values, such as: - and XX which pose no data protection issues”. Though

Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-15

7:31 AM To: Roger D Carney ; a...@nostrum.com; regext@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees@ietf.org Subject: Re: RE: AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-15 Roger, In reviewing the items. I provide my feedback embedded within your list, prefixed with “JG – “. — JG [cid:image001.png

Re: [regext] AD Review: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-15

Good Morning, Thanks for the review and input Adam. · Abstract updated with some more introductory verbiage. · Updated 1.1 with lower “required” · Updated 3.1 with “that” in place of “which” · Updated 3.4 with “lang” attribute for consistency · Question on 3.

Re: [regext] list of documents to consider for working group adoption

Good Morning, Please add https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-validate/. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 10:19 AM To: gal...@elistx.com; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] list of documents to consid

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018DEC19

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday December 19th at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around Reporting and if time allows a discussion on the Validate draft. Agenda 1. Reporting Repository

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018OCT16

Meeting started at 11:03 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney, Jody Kolker, James Gould, James Galvin, Gurshabad Grover, Rick Wilhelm Agenda 1. Validate draft (comments, concerns, implementations) - New version to be posted this week. 2. Registry Mapping * Continue the lively discussi

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-15.txt

Good Morning, A small updated was needed, implementers found the "standard" attribute was not at the correct level in the commandDataType. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 9:31 AM To: i-d-annou...@ietf.o

[regext] FW: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-09.txt

) were updated. At this point, as shepherd, I believe this draft is ready for publication. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2018 12:57 PM To: Roger D Carney Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-regext-change-poll

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018OCT16)

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Tuesday October 16th at 16:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around two topics: Agenda 1. Validate draft (comments, concerns, implementations) - New version to be posted this week. 2. Registry

Re: [regext] Call for agenda items for Bangkok

Good Morning, I think that that we could still benefit from a work session. With the RDAP Profile completing ICANN public comment in mid October and final publication expected in November, it may be a good time to review and answer (and confirm) any of the technical questions/issues. I also t

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-12.txt

Good Afternoon, This is revision 12 of the Fee document that we discussed last week at IETF-102. This is to address the last few items discussed on list and last week at the F2F meeting. For detailed discussion notes please see document shepherd James Gould's email to the list last Wednesday

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JUN05) Notes

y deal with other objects and other extensions. Thoughts? Pieter -- Pieter Vandepitte Product Expert +32 16 28 49 70 www.dnsbelgium.be<http://www.dnsbelgium.be> [DNS_PUNT_Belgium_RGB] From: regext mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Roger D Carney mailto:rcar...@

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JUN05) Notes

Sorry about the tardiness, please enjoy, see everyone in a couple weeks. Meeting started at 11:06 (UTC-5) Attendees: Roger Carney, James Gould, Jody Kolker, Jim Galvin Agenda 1.Validate draft (comments, concerns, implementations) 2.Registry Mapping a.Continue the lively discussion th

Re: [regext] Proposed Revision to our Charter

Roger -Original Message- From: Andrew Newton [mailto:a...@hxr.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 9:45 AM To: Roger D Carney Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: Re: [regext] Proposed Revision to our Charter On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Roger D Carney mailto:rcar

Re: [regext] Proposed Revision to our Charter

Good Morning, I agree with those saying this new wording seems a bit broad, what if "...related to the operation of Internet identifier registries..." was changed to "...related to the operation of Internet domain name registration systems"? Thanks Roger -Original Message

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (Validate Draft)

Good Morning, I will be sending out minutes/notes of the Interim meeting later this week. I agree with what Jim proposed during the meeting and here in reference to providing ids for new/existing contacts, as well as the one to one matching of the check/response items. Just for a little color/

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Morning, This is great, thanks Jim for the thorough review and comments. We can use this set of items to start our discussions today. Thanks Roger From: Gould, James [mailto:jgo...@verisign.com] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 12:56 PM To: Roger D Carney ; Registration Protocols Extensions

Re: [regext] Potential Topic for IETF-102: RDAP Search Capabilities

Good Morning, For the two hour working session I would suggest three forty minute sessions (in no specific order): * Unhandled Namespaces (Jim Gould) * Registry Mapping (Roger) * RDAP Search and Authentication (Francisco/Scott) Thanks Roger -Original Message- Fro

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-gould-carney-regext-registry-00.txt

hursday, May 31, 2018 3:12 PM To: Roger D Carney ; Lin Jia ; James Gould ; Roger D Carney ; Jody Kolker Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gould-carney-regext-registry-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-gould-carney-regext-registry-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Jam

Re: [regext] Preparing for Montreal

Good Morning, Do we need to discuss our next documents in our regular meeting slot? For the regular meeting, I would like to give an update from the interim meeting(s). I like the two suggested topics for the working session: Registry Mapping and Poll Messages w/ Unhandled Namespaces

Re: [regext] Poll messages with unhandled namespaces (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07.txt)

Good Afternoon, +1. We agree that that we should move forward with the current draft-ietf-regext-change-poll draft and move this discussion along another path. Thanks Roger From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 9:16 AM To: James Ga

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Tuesday June 5th at 16:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around two topics: Agenda 1. Validate draft (comments, concerns, implementations) 2. Registry Mapping * Continue the lively discu

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-10.txt

Good Afternoon, This latest draft contains minor changes to the document that came about due to WGLC comments. Thanks Roger From: regext on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 4:31 PM To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: regext@ietf.

Re: [regext] Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

Good Morning, Thanks Jims! I will have a new version posted next week. Thanks Roger From: regext on behalf of James Galvin Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 8:25 AM To: Gould, James Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] Review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fe

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting (2018JAN31) Notes

Meeting started at 9:04 (UTC-6) Moderated by Roger Carney. Attendees: Roger Carney, James Gould, Antoin Verschuren, James Galvin, Jody Kolker, Joe Snitker Agenda 1. Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts * Base Mappings * Policy Extensions: how a server implements an exten

Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 101

Good Morning, Things for sending this out Antoin. Yes, I agree that we should meet in London. I think our last meeting showed that trying to combine the regular meeting and a working session does not work. I would like to suggest a 90 minute regular session and a second 60 minute working se

Re: [regext] WGLC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

Thanks Jim, I will add some text to describe this attribute and look to add an example. From: Gould, James Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 10:15 AM To: Roger D Carney; 'regext@ietf.org' Subject: Re: [regext] WGLC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/

Re: [regext] WGLC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees

Thanks Scott, I will take a look at those sections From: regext on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 9:15 AM To: 'gal...@elistx.com'; 'regext@ietf.org' Subject: Re: [regext] WGLC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-

Re: [regext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-09.txt

:48 PM To: Jothan Frakes; Gavin Brown; Roger D Carney; Roger D Carney Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-09.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-09.txt has been successfully submitted by Roger Carney and posted to the IETF repository. Name

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday January 31st at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to focus the discussion around the Registry Mapping proposal. Agenda 1. Introduce the Registry Mapping concepts * Base Mappings * Policy Extens

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Afternoon, We held an interim meeting today January 10, 2018 and discussed the Fee document. In attendance was James Gould, Jody Kolker, Joe Snitker, Peter Koch, Antoin Verschuren, and Roger Carney. Scott Hollenbeck, James Galvin and Andreas Huber sent their regrets. Agenda: 1. Fee

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

, this will be the last time to discuss before the document is updated. Thanks Roger From: Antoin Verschuren [mailto:i...@antoin.nl] Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 9:04 AM To: Roger D Carney Cc: regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite I will attend too. But so far

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

Good Morning, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday January 10th at 19:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to discuss items around the latest version of the Fee draft and to introduce a Registry Mapping proposal. Agenda 1. Fee * Discuss appropriate level for , a

[regext] REGEXT Fee Document

Good Afternoon, As mentioned today in the REGEXT face to face meeting at IETF-100 in Singapore, we have two remaining questions open on the current draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees. 1. "avail" attribute meaning on partial return of results, see section 3.9

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Afternoon, We held an interim meeting on October 11th, 2017 to discuss the current Fee and Validate draft documents. In attendance was Jody Kolker, Antoin Verschuren, James Galvin, and Roger Carney. Alex Mayrhofer sent his regrets. Agenda: 1. Fee * Confirm Edits (section 3.8 an

Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

te session where the additional time will be dedicated to working items. Any thoughts? Any more agenda items? Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 20 sep. 2017, om 17:55 heeft Roger D Carney mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>> het volgend

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Invite

Good Afternoon, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday October 11th at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. We plan to discuss items around the latest versions of the Fee draft and of the Validate draft. Agenda 1. Fee * Confirm Edits (section 3.8 and section 4.0)

Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

Good Morning, I would like to suggest the following agenda items for the working session: * The Validate draft * Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing And for updates: * Fee * Validate * Interim Meetings Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

te phase details for fee information.)? Does anyone else have thoughts on this rewording? Thanks Roger From: Gould, James [mailto:jgo...@verisign.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 12:22 PM To: Roger D Carney ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Roger, It’s not c

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

, 2017 2:43 PM To: Roger D Carney ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Roger, I don’t believe it is clean to assume the capabilities or desire of the client when the current phase is a quiet period by defaulting the return to the “open” / general registration phase. When

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

, August 24, 2017 8:03 AM To: Roger D Carney ; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting Roger, Thanks for hosting this meeting. Unfortunately, I was not able to participate in the meeting. I include some points below based on review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06 and the minutes

Re: [regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

processed by the sever as a whole. We will look to add clarity to the document. Agreed, there will be some scenarios that this draft will not be able to resolve completely. Thanks Roger From: Karl Heinz Wolf [mailto:khwo...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 3:02 AM To: Roger D Carney Cc

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Afternoon, We held an interim meeting this morning and discussed the current Fee draft document (draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06) and the Validate draft document (draft-ietf-regext-validate-02). In attendance was Jody Kolker, Antoin Verschuren, Alex Mayrhofer, James Galvin, Dean Farwell, An

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Good Morning, Thomas, I think the Fee draft can handle your use case of using launch phase for premium names (a premium string is only available in one phase/subphase combination so if client does not pass phase you should return that one valid combination). Can you provide examples where it

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Good Morning, To me it seems: 1. That this is somewhat of a corner case. 2. I don't think the current draft of launchphase addresses the issue Thomas is expressing. 3. I don't think there is a need to modify launchphase for this functionality. Sending a separate note to discuss Thomas' is

[regext] Interim Meeting Invite

Good Afternoon, I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday August 23 at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes. As you may have seen I have recently published new versions of the Fee draft, draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06 and of the Validate draft draft-ietf-regext-validate-02. Agenda

[regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Good Morning, Coming out of Prague I mentioned that I would post to the list the idea of a Launch Phase Mapping/List feature. I believe the thought was to come up with some way to query the registry for a list of phases and associated dates for a TLD. Are there any thoughts on where/how this m

[regext] Multiple REGEXT Sessions at IETF Meetings

Good Afternoon, I just wanted to start (continue) the discussion about having two sessions for REGEXT at IETF meetings. As many of you heard me say in Prague, I thought that the extra working session that we had in Chicago was very productive and I would like to see this continue with future me

[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting

Good Afternoon, We held an interim meeting this morning and discussed the current Fee draft document (draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-05). In attendance was Thomas Corte, Jody Kolker, Antoin Verschuren, Alex Mayrhofer, James Galvin, Scott Hollenbeck, Joe Snitker, and Roger Carney. We started by con

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-05.txt

Good Afternoon, Thanks Thomas, I will make sure we get that updated. Thanks Roger -Original Message- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Corte Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:03 AM To: regext@ietf.org Cc: supp...@tango-rs.com Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Actio

Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal

Friday, June 23, 2017 8:19 AM To: Jody Kolker Cc: Roger D Carney ; Registration Protocols Extensions Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal Yes, please, let’s move forward with scheduling a meeting to discuss the fee document on 11 July. Please take the lead. Jim On 21 Ju

  1   2   >