James,
My comments are embedded below with JG2.
In summary, the concept of leveraging the domain pending delete period to
cascade down to the child hosts and host to domain links (e.g., name servers),
with the ability to rollback with a domain restore command, is interesting to
investigate
Thanks! Replies with a JM.
On Jul 26, 2023, at 6:22 AM, Gould, James wrote:
James,
I find your historic EPP server policies to be very interesting. I provide
comments embedded with your points below with a “JG – “ prefix.
--
JG
James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
Peter,
This moves beyond the protocol itself and into operational concerns of chosen
policies. Based on the language in the EPP RFCs, the registry can choose
various policies on which hosts require glue (e.g., all internal hosts, only
in-bailiwick hosts), what pre-conditions need to be met to
James,
On 7/26/23 06:22, Gould, James wrote:
* allow deletion of domains with linked subordinate hosts – there is no need
to prevent this if the registrar can simply rename the subordinate hosts and
free themselves of this restriction
JG - [...] I would not leave the lame delegations, so
James,
I find your historic EPP server policies to be very interesting. I provide
comments embedded with your points below with a “JG – “ prefix.
--
JG
[cid87442*image001.png@01D960C5.C631DA40]
James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
That a registrar can change the delegation of a domain managed by another
registrar, point it to anywhere (which led to this discussion), without the
consent of the registrant. As noted, I allowed renaming, but restricted it to
within the existing domain boundary – the registrant trusted
Not being an EPP expert, it seems to me that if the below works (which it seems
to have?), it addresses pretty much all concerns in a very reasonable way.
Would there be any reasons for not making this the recommended practice?
Peter
On 7/25/23 14:39, James Mitchell wrote:
Feedback my own
> Host rename always seemed a dangerous operation
Why so?
--
Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are
not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated.
AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at 13
Feedback my own and not from IANA.
If I recall correctly, the approach I took when building an EPP server several
years ago was:
* allow deletion of domains with linked subordinate hosts – there is no
need to prevent this if the registrar can simply rename the subordinate hosts
and free
