I have been an avid mandrake fan since i chanced upon a copy back around the
5.2 era, at the time i was using red hat, since then i have tried others but
none seem quite as slickly put together as mandrake, of course i am a gui
baby
I have been running rieser fs since it was first made
Hi
James Troup wrote:
I installed reiserfs on all my partitions except /boot
When it boots it comes to Reiserfs checking / and just sits there with
will put log info to stderr forever until you hit ENTER key.
Anyone seen this?
Probably, reiserfsck awaits for confirmation from you. It is
Hi
Jonas Jensen (by way of Jonas Jensen ) (by way of Jonas Jensen )
wrote:
One of my reiserfs disks became corrupted last week, and it's still causing
me problems. I'll try to describe it in full detail, hoping that this problem
can be fixed for good.
The disk in question is a Linux
On Monday 01 October 2001 12:01, you wrote:
IMHO, when hardware starts to fail - it is time to think about changing
it.
Reiserfs has not way to know when it should give up. It sends correct
data to
disk, broken hardware writes it wrong. Who did corrupt the data then?
The worst thing in your
hello everyone,
i am jsut a starter to the this file system as matter of fact i am starter to systems
area. please can you suggest me some sites where i learn from ground up and also some
books if available...
thank
regards
anup
if there are FAQ's of this list please can have the link
On Monday 01 October 2001 19:26, you wrote:
Yes, please find realiable harddrive, backup broken fielsystem there via
dd if=/dev/filesystem-with-problem of=/dev/reliable-device bs=4096
conv=notrunc
Then we will be able to recover your data. Please let us know when you have
done with that
Hello everyone,
2.4.11pre1 has some significant changes which affect almost everything that
touches a disk in linux. The buffer cache is now backed by an address
space per device (made possible by Andrea's blkdev changes in 2.4.10), and
many cleanups were done by Linus and Al Viro.
In every
There are two possible reasons you had trouble with mkreiserfs:
* it writes to different blocks on the drive than mke2fs (and presumably hit the
bad blocks you later remapped).
* random chance.
Maybe we should put it on our feature wish list to have mkreiserfs do some light
testing of the
Chris,
It 'feels' faster on my NFS bonnie benchmarks. I still see some
degradataion in speed on larger files -- but I think that is a different
'feature' of the filesystem.
512M RAM 2.4.11pre1 NFSV3 server lightly loaded
ReiserFS version 3.6.25 (v2 format filesys)
100M network -- solaris 8
