Since I enabled all the debugging options that would compile, I re-ran
the mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hda8, then attempted to untar the linux kernel
again, however it didn't like that very much:
Here is what I got from the log:
lookup inode: 65897 "de4x5.c"
creating "de4x5.c" in 65897
reiser4 panicked cow
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Tom Vier wrote:
anyone working on scsi wb's? there was a long thread on l-k about wb's, but
i wasn't aware what came of it.
There was a discussion about that on Kernel Summit 2003 and general opinion was
that SCSI
does
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2003-08-28T20:18:14,
Tom Vier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
and shell builtins would have to be modded to insure page alignment. it
would be neat if all the regular builtins (cp, mv, ln) were atomic.
mv (ie, rename), ln and rm have always been atomic. That's a PO
Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
I've been looking at the reiser4 source code for a few days, and I
can't find any non-essential plugins.
This is called the minimal functionality for first release project
management style. ;-)
For example: You say on the website that you've written several
security p
Andi Kleen wrote:
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Because atomicity in ext3 basically consists of guaranteeing that the filesystem is consistent, and due to the disk drive implementation 4k blocks are written atomically. So, if you span more than one block, it is not guaranteed to be a
Compile of linux-2.6.0-test4 with reiser4 is good.
Compile of libaal-0.4.9 is good
Compile of reiser4fsprogs-0.4.12 is good.
mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hda8 is good.
When I issue the following command:
mount -t reiser4 /dev/hda8 /mnt/lfs or
mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda8 /mnt/lfs
I get the following er
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:21:20AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> some IBM drives a power failure can cause a more than 4k chunk to go
> bad, and that this can be a problem for filesystem consistency.
this thread talks about fsync, wb's, etc, and i think also mentions the
problem w/ an ibm drive. if
Hello,
I just got some corruption on my reiserfs /usr filesystem tonight. I
think it may be related to hardware problems, but I'm not sure.
Now, my motherboard has two onboard IDE controllers - a VIA and a
Promise. I've got one hard disk on each controller, an 80GB and a 60Gb
respectively (both
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 05:17, Michael Konrad wrote:
Hello,
> Compile of linux-2.6.0-test4 with reiser4 is good.
> Compile of libaal-0.4.9 is good
> Compile of reiser4fsprogs-0.4.12 is good.
>
> mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hda8 is good.
>
> When I issue the following command:
>
> mount -t reiser4 /dev/
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:51, Mike Benoit wrote:
> Since I enabled all the debugging options that would compile, I re-ran
> the mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hda8, then attempted to untar the linux kernel
> again, however it didn't like that very much:
>
> Here is what I got from the log:
>
> lookup inode: 65
10 matches
Mail list logo
