On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:46:13PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> Is anyone looing into the dbench multitheaded regression in 2.6 that I
> reported here a couple of weeks ago? I don't see any change in the
> latest trees.
>
> http://ausgsa.ibm.com/projects/l/ltcperformance/2003benchmarks/regressi
Bennett Todd wrote:
(although the forward mappings within /var/lib/pkg/foo wouldn't
update automagically).
They could, with the right plug-in.
A plug-in to reach in and edit the forward references in the package
database misses my vision of "simple";
*sigh*
You do not seem to grasp the power of yo
2003-09-03T17:18:07 J?rgen Botz:
> >With ReiserFS v4 its as natural as can be; a file /usr/bin/foo,
> >installed by a package foo, would simply have a symlink
> >
> > /usr/bin/foo/pkg -> /var/lib/pkg/foo
> >
> >Besides scaling elegantly and staying wonderfully simple, this has
> >the additional
Bennett Todd wrote:
As I've gotten deeper into the project, I've had my nose rubbed in
the fact that rpm is the accumulating cruft heart; it's the worst.
Amen. It's so bad that RH can't even fix it anymore... It took
them the better part of a year to fix the widely reported hanging
bug that appear
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:46:13PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> Is anyone looing into the dbench multitheaded regression in 2.6 that I
> reported here a couple of weeks ago? I don't see any change in the
> latest trees.
>
> http://ausgsa.ibm.com/projects/l/ltcperformance/2003benchmarks/regressi
Is anyone looing into the dbench multitheaded regression in 2.6 that I
reported here a couple of weeks ago? I don't see any change in the
latest trees.
http://ausgsa.ibm.com/projects/l/ltcperformance/2003benchmarks/regression/results/history-graphs/dbench.reiser.throughput.plot.16.png
Steve
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2003-09-03T02:17:50,
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
No, isolation is not yet implemented and won't be unless we come up with
some more funding from somewhere. The txnmgr seems to be structured to
handle isolation, but
Ah, okay. Sorry, I think I
I've got this thought that ReiserFS v4 may make it possible to
implement a _really_ trivial software package management system,
with even better power than rpm.
I'm building myself a new Linux distrib; my proximate motivation is
that while there's lots I like about Red Hat --- in particular, rpm
i
What's up Chris?
Your latest stuff working fine on 2.4.22-rc1-rl (pre-emption; haven't time for
a "newer" version, yet).
patches/2.4.22-data-logging> l
insgesamt 89
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 536 Aug 6 04:50 .
drwxr-xr-x4 root root 408 Sep 3 13:46 ..
-rw-r--r--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# debugfs.reiser4 /dev/hda8
debugfs.reiser4 0.4.12
Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003 by Hans Reiser, licensing governed by
reiser4progs/COPYING.
Master super block:
offset: 16
blksize:4096
magic: R4Sb
format: 0
label:
Format super blo
Done, recompiled kernel and mount works fine.
Now onto using it.
Thank you,
Michael
>>> Nikita Danilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/03/03 06:11AM >>>
Michael Konrad writes:
> Hello Yury,
>
> This is what occurs in kernel log, when I try the reiser4 mount:
>
> Sep 3 05:48:14 [kernel] reiser4[
On 2003-09-03T02:17:50,
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> No, isolation is not yet implemented and won't be unless we come up with
> some more funding from somewhere. The txnmgr seems to be structured to
> handle isolation, but
Ah, okay. Sorry, I think I had older plans in mind an
Michael Konrad writes:
> Hello Yury,
>
> This is what occurs in kernel log, when I try the reiser4 mount:
>
> Sep 3 05:48:14 [kernel] reiser4[mount(16746)]: get_ready_format40
> (fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/disk_format40.c:229)[nikita-3228]:
>
> Here is the part of my .config file w
Hello Yury,
This is what occurs in kernel log, when I try the reiser4 mount:
Sep 3 05:48:14 [kernel] reiser4[mount(16746)]: get_ready_format40
(fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/disk_format40.c:229)[nikita-3228]:
Here is the part of my .config file with reiserfs:
CONFIG_REISER4_FS=y
# CONFIG_REI
14 matches
Mail list logo
