Hi all, I've encountered following problem:
on one of my servers, kernel started to log this messages:
Dec 19 04:02:13 server kernel: vs-3050: wait_buffer_until_released:
nobody releases buffer (dev 21:01, size 4096, blocknr 38174720, count 3,
list 0, state 0x10019, page c156b250, (UPTODATE,CLEAN,
Hi all. Newbie here :-)
Here is my problem:
I have a Linux gentoo box with a 60GB HD using ReiserFS 3.6. Last
Sunday, I attempted to do an emerge sync (which is HD intensive), and
my system froze. After the 2nd time my system froze doing an emerge
sync, I booted without X and attempted again. Th
correction:
CTRL+ALTF2 did respond- after a few minutes. It is scrolling messages
by way to fast to read.
On 07/01/2005, at 10:50, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
Hi all. Newbie here :-)
Here is my problem:
I have a Linux gentoo box with a 60GB HD using ReiserFS 3.6. Last
Sunday, I attempted to do an e
Hello
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:50, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
> Hi all. Newbie here :-)
> Here is my problem:
> I have a Linux gentoo box with a 60GB HD using ReiserFS 3.6. Last
> Sunday, I attempted to do an emerge sync (which is HD intensive), and
> my system froze. After the 2nd time my system
On 07/01/2005, at 12:20, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
I would move the problem hard disk to mashine which has (or can
download) latest reiserfsck
(http://thebsh.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs
-3.6.19.tar.gz),
make sure that it performs I/O of that disk decently (hdparm -t
/dev/problem-dis
Hello
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 15:11, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
> On 07/01/2005, at 12:20, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
>
> > I would move the problem hard disk to mashine which has (or can
> > download) latest reiserfsck
> > (http://thebsh.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs
> > -3.6.19.tar.gz),
> Hello
> On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 15:11, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
>> On 07/01/2005, at 12:20, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
>>
>> > I would move the problem hard disk to mashine which has (or can
>> > download) latest reiserfsck
>> > (http://thebsh.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs
>> > -3.6.
On 07/01/2005, at 14:33, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
When you boot off liveCD - do you have a network
Yes, I have a Network
and place where
reiserfsprogs can be put and compiled besides that 60gb device with
broken reiserfs?
Not locally (that machine has only one HD), but I can mount a share on
the
Alternatively, try the following. Go to slackware.com Grab a reiser3
enabled boot image and make a bootdisk.
If memory serves me right, this is the one you want
ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.slackware.com/slackware-10.0/kernels/ba
reacpi.i
Then, go into
ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.slack
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 15:44, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
> On 07/01/2005, at 14:33, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
>
> > When you boot off liveCD - do you have a network
>
> Yes, I have a Network
>
> > and place where
> > reiserfsprogs can be put and compiled besides that 60gb device with
> > broken rei
On 07/01/2005, at 14:43, Spam wrote:
There are liveCD's with reiser4 and reiser4progs. For example:
http://lxnay.dnsalias.org/livecd-iso/index.php
As the system there is Gentoo, and this LiveCD is gentoo, this looks
like my best bet.
Well, heading for the download now. See you in a few days (ho
Hello
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:03, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
> On 07/01/2005, at 14:43, Spam wrote:
>
> > There are liveCD's with reiser4 and reiser4progs. For example:
> > http://lxnay.dnsalias.org/livecd-iso/index.php
>
Spam is about reiser4!! progs. Whereas you need reiserfsprogs.
> As the
Chris Dukes wrote:
All filesystems will fail or suffer degraded performance under
certain conditions, you need to determine what conditions are acceptable
for your data.
and each generation of software reduces the extent of such conditions.
Reiser4 fixes this problem cleanly.
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:55:20PM +0300, Edward Shishkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:45:06PM +0300, Alex Zarochentsev
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>Tea hash is designed to be more resistant.
> >>
> >>
>
> Actually this can not be more resistant as it
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:22:02AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Chris Dukes wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >All filesystems will fail or suffer degraded performance under
> >certain conditions, you need to determine what conditions are acceptable
> >for your data.
> >
> >
> >
> and each generation of software
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 20:25, hanasaki wrote:
> Version of reiserfsk
> ==
> == From debian sarge
> /sbin/reiserfsck -V
> reiserfsck 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
> == also used the version in knoppix 3.7 with similar results
>
> the output of two consecutive runs of --rebuil
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:13:27 +0300
"Vladimir Saveliev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reiserfsck --rebuild-tree 's speed depends of file set substantially.
> The worst case - a lots (millons) of small files.
> But even in that case on average today hardware it should not take more
> than 4-5 hours f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
| Chris Dukes wrote:
|
|>
|>
|> All filesystems will fail or suffer degraded performance under
|> certain conditions, you need to determine what conditions are acceptable
|> for your data.
|>
|>
|>
| and each generation of software re
Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:13:27 +0300
"Vladimir Saveliev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
reiserfsck --rebuild-tree 's speed depends of file set substantially.
The worst case - a lots (millons) of small files.
But even in that case on average today hardware it should not take more
David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
| Chris Dukes wrote:
|
|>
|>
|> All filesystems will fail or suffer degraded performance under
|> certain conditions, you need to determine what conditions are
acceptable
|> for your data.
|>
|>
|>
| and each generation of software reduces the extent of such
Could you outline exactly what takes place on a rebuild-tree?
I was under the incorrect assumption that if a rebuild-tree is 100%
successful then the FS is ok and a subsequent rebuild-tree will have
nothing to fix/report. .
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 20:25, hanasaki wr
On 08/01/2005, at 01:35, Chris Cox wrote:
Not sure about this.. but I have observed that some systems trash
resierfs3
pretty badly, while others do not. The problem seems a bit worse with
LVM.
For example a Compaq n610c laptop will trash reiserfs3 on hard
shutdown or crash
about 1 out of every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
| David Masover wrote:
|
|> Hans Reiser wrote:
|> | Chris Dukes wrote:
|> |
|> |>
|> |>
|> |> All filesystems will fail or suffer degraded performance under
|> |> certain conditions, you need to determine what conditions are
|> accep
Hi,
I have been trying to download the patch for the 2.6.10 kernel from
ftp.namesys.com but I get connection refused from the server:
% ncftp ftp.namesys.com
NcFTP 3.0.3 (April 15, 2001) by Mike Gleason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Could not connect to 212.16.7.65: Connection refused.
Lars Tobias Børsting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been trying to download the patch for the 2.6.10 kernel...
Meaning the Reiser4 patch for the 2.6.10 kernel...
Regards,
--
Lars Tobias Børsting
* Lars Tobias Børsting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-08 07:05]:
> I have been trying to download the patch for the 2.6.10 kernel from
> ftp.namesys.com but I get connection refused from the server:
The HTTP access works, try http://ftp.namesys.com/pub/
--
DW
Damien Wyart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lars Tobias Børsting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have been trying to download the patch for the 2.6.10 kernel from
>> ftp.namesys.com but I get connection refused from the server:
>
> The HTTP access works, try http://ftp.namesys.com/pub/
Thanks!
27 matches
Mail list logo
