On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
I just formatted a new 2GB Reiser4 FS, then I moved a whole ccache
cache tree to this new FS (cache size was about
Belese porno kanallarini izlemek icin
http://www.turk-tv.com
sayfasini ziyaret edin :-)
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:55:57AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
If I understand it right, the original Reiser4 model of file metadata is
the file-as-directory stuff that caused such a furor the last big push
for inclusion (search for Silent semantic changes in Reiser4):
The furor was caused
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
[...]
Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for Suse/Redhat/Mandrake
that include reiser4?
Suse excluded reiser4 from 10.1 because they want to keep the kernel cleaner
than
Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 10:55 schrieb Marcel Hilzinger:
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
[...]
Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for Suse/Redhat/Mandrake
that include reiser4?
One more
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 07:20:25PM -0700, Wil Reichert wrote:
On 8/2/06, Krzysztof Halasa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage
controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for
Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 10:55 schrieb Marcel Hilzinger:
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
[...]
Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for
It's quite late for inclusion in the next Ubuntu release, but who knows.
Maybe it is not, it's a playground, Mark would not hesitate to postpone
Edgy's release if it requires polishing the whole thing due to edgy
features.
Could you contact him for us, and ask? It is more convincing when users
On 03/08/06, Maciej Sołtysiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's quite late for inclusion in the next Ubuntu release, but who knows.
Maybe it is not, it's a playground, Mark would not hesitate to postpone
Edgy's release if it requires polishing the whole thing due to edgy
features.
Could you
I've just had some warnings show up in my kernel log. I don't know if
they're related to the troubles I've been having (I fscked after the
last panic).
reiser4[updatedb(32445)]: key_warning
(fs/reiser4/plugin/file_plugin_common.c:513)[nikita-717]:
WARNING: Error for inode 401698 (-2)
for key:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, David Masover wrote:
RAID deals with the case where a device fails. RAID 1 with 2 disks can
in theory detect an internal inconsistency but cannot fix it.
Still, if it does that, that should be enough. The scary part wasn't
that there's an internal inconsistency, but
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Mirroring a corrupt file system to a remote data center will mirror your
corruption.
Rolling back to a snapshot typically only happens when you notice a
corruption which can go undetected for quite a while, so even that will
benefit from having
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Hans Reiser wrote:
You will want to try our compression plugin, it has an ecc for every 64k
What kind of forward error correction would that be, and how much and
what failure patterns can it correct? URL suffices.
--
Matthias Andree
Le 03.08.2006 08:09, Alexander Zarochentsev a écrit :
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 01:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 31.07.2006 21:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev a écrit :
Hello
What kind of load did you run on reiser4 at that time?
I just formatted a new 2GB Reiser4 FS, then I moved a whole ccache
Hello,
I've just had some warnings show up in my kernel log. I don't know if
they're related to the troubles I've been having (I fscked after the
last panic).
please apply the following patch:
re-add to reiser4_releasepage mistakenly removed page_count check.
extra page reference is used to
Matthias Andree wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Hans Reiser wrote:
You will want to try our compression plugin, it has an ecc for every 64k
What kind of forward error correction would that be,
Actually we use checksums, not ECC. If checksum is wrong, then run
fsck - it will remove the
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:03:07PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Ric Wheeler wrote:
Mirroring a corrupt file system to a remote data center will mirror your
corruption.
Which makes me wonder if backup systems shouldn't help with this. If
they are reading the
Edward Shishkin wrote:
Matthias Andree wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006, Hans Reiser wrote:
You will want to try our compression plugin, it has an ecc for every
64k
What kind of forward error correction would that be,
Actually we use checksums, not ECC. If checksum is wrong, then run
On 8/3/06, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Berkeley DB can, since version 4.1 (IIRC), write checksums (newer
versions document this as SHA1) on its database pages, to detect
corruptions and writes that were supposed to be atomic but failed
(because you cannot write 4K or 16K atomically
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 03:08:32PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
I just got a warning message with 2.6.18-rc3 that I've never seen before :
ReiserFS: sda4: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory or indirect
item
I have seen the same message (if I remember correctly) on my laptop
The recent discussions regarding reiser4 and possible inclusion have
also caught the eye(s) of LWN.
I have made the article available for you, non-lwn-subscribers, so that you may
have a look at it here http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/193663/9d2ac03195c775bc/;.
--
Sincerely | Homepage:
Jørgen|
If the software (filesystem like ZFS or database like Berkeley DB)
finds a mismatch for a checksum on a block read, then what?
Is there a recovery mechanism, or do you just be happy you know there is
a problem (and go to backup)?
Thx
Matthias Andree wrote:
Berkeley DB can, since
Thanks Vladimir, this fixed the problem.
Joel
On 7/25/06, Joel Heenan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/25/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 08:37 +1000, Joel Heenan wrote:
On 7/22/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
On
Thanks.
I've applied the patch, and I'll let you know if any errors reccur.
Andrew Wade
24 matches
Mail list logo
