Hello!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:45:26AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
I've got most of data=ordered finished, there are a few paths like
writepage and O_DIRECT that need tweaking. Thanks to Oleg's file_write
work in 2.6.x, the data=journal patch is much cleaner than 2.4, it is
almost done but
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 04:38:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
It is because of paranoid -Werror flag.
./configure --disable-werror will help you.
However, if your system will have readline (as on systems which are used by
reiser4progs developers :-) headers that warning
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:05:58PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
my system definitely has readline installed, and i get the same error.
On the other hand, you need not only readline itself, but also its header
files.
Lots of distributions (e.g. redhat-alike) form another package called
Hello!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:41:47AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
did you adjust our headers to be redhat compatible? If not, please do.
i didn't see anything in the READ.ME about adjusting headers, but would
this also explain why, if i build reiser 4 support directly into the
Hello!
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:56:00PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
What's up Chris?
Your latest stuff working fine on 2.4.22-rc1-rl (pre-emption; haven't time for
a newer version, yet).
I forwarded the patch to Hans to propagate to Marcelo, but it have not went through.
I will check with
Hello!
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:46:32PM +0200, Roland H?der wrote:
another thing: I could extract the missing metadata as you described
to a compressed file. But I do not mail it to you, because it contains
security-breaking-data: My Online-Banking stuff. :-( If I do so,
Hm. Can you
Hello!
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:15:01PM +0200, Roland H?der wrote:
Hm. Can you tell us what kernel version you were using at the time of
writing your files to encrypted device?
Opps: Vanilla 2.4.21 with cryptoloop (not patched, it's compiled alone
and installed into
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Tom Vier wrote:
anyone working on scsi wb's? there was a long thread on l-k about wb's, but
i wasn't aware what came of it.
There was a discussion about that on Kernel Summit 2003 and general opinion was that
SCSI
does not need the WB stuff at
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:59:20PM +, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
I have got this oops running fsstress and fsx-linux
on a 20Gb reiserfs partition. Fully reproducible.
What are the options to fsx and fsstress?
fsx-linux linux-2.5.0.tar.bz2 :)
mkdir d
fsstress -d d
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:28:44PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote:
btw, I suppose this feature will be removed if/when reiser4 is merged?:
config REISER4_FS_SYSCALL
bool Enable reiser4 system call
No. It will be fixed.
dmesg errors:
(fs/ext3/inode.c, 2728):
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:16:35PM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote:
Are these patches available outside of bitkeeper, and if so, where are
they located?
Yes, they are at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.08.22 , as somebody
pointed out already.
I just forgot to mention the URL.
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:22:52PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
Only list the file/directory that's being worked upon when explicitly
requested. When not explicitly requested, set an alarm handler to
print it every second (or so). Lots of time is now spent in writing to
I think we
Hello!
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:05:28AM +0800, Locke wrote:
the files. I'm guessing the reason why it recovered so little was
because that because I was running a 7.8GB+40GB LVM and the 40GB
pyhsical volume wasn't working and left it with only 7.8GB.
Yes of course.
is_tree_node: node
Hello!
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:12:27AM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Well. This is actually unfortunate, I agree. In such a case you'd better
move your reiserfs images to some other place for the time of reiserfsck
--rebuild-tree run.
or compress them.
But if there was at any time an
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:20:55PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
Reiserfs messed up our filesystem again (one file gives us permission
And you use what kernel with what patches on what hardware?
A surface scan needs to read all the datablocks. But an fsck
doesn't. At least that's the
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:00:03PM -0400, John Dalbec wrote:
I just got an nfsd-fh: found a name that I didn't expect yesterday.
I'm using a Red Hat 2.4.20 RPM with 2.4.20-pending+data-logging+quota.
Should I apply just this patch or both this patch and the
iget5_locked_2.4.20
Hello!
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:32:25PM -0700, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote:
I thought I'd give it a try on 2.6.0-test3-mm1.
Even with 'make mrproper' before compiling, I get the following error
message:
(Is there any interest in such error reports?)
Yes, there is.
bobele linux # make
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:31:39PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
getxattr(light_in_time_of_darkness__glad_to_see_you.wav,
system.posix_acl_access
and there it sits waiting for heat-death-of-universe.
Hm, this code is by SuSE people (and it is only in suse kernels) and I
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:56:55PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
rephrase that as, use 3.6.11, if it still fails, tell us, the segfault
will at least be fixed regardless of whether fsck has enough data to do
its job.
But it was not failing on the IDE drive anyway.
I don't understand
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:28:15PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
But while rebuilding the tree, I got a segmentation fault. Because I
didn't
want to continue work on the original raid system, I copied the entire
raid
disk to the IDE disk.
dd if=/dev/rd/c0d0 of=/dev/hda
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:54:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[usb-ohci:sohci_device_operations+781321/95136603] .LC62 [reiserfs] 0xc3
Jul 14 13:25:41 mai-stor2 kernel: Call Trace: [f8a456d5] .LC62 [reiserfs] 0xc3
Jul 14 13:25:41 mai-stor2 kernel: [f8a3ad1e] journal_mark_dirty
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:30:19AM -0700, Suman Puthana wrote:
We do not see any problem when we are writing into empty space(using the
write call in a C program) as the file is extending( the write operation
takes less than 3 ms), but for a certain part of the application we need to
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:29:38PM -0500, Matt Stegman wrote:
I get the same behaviour, but it appears that *only* the append-only
attribute is ignored. Other attributes are respected fine. However,
there are still some wierd things with reiserfs and attributes. This is
a pretty
Hello!
BTW, it seems one other important change was omissed in the short summary below.
The license on the reiserfsprogs package was changed from GPLv2 to
GPLv2 with additional restriction that I quote below:
===
ReiserFSprogs is hereby licensed under the GNU General
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
Somewhat.
Mouse movement is OK, now. But...
1+0 Records aus
0.000u 3.090s 0:16.81 18.3% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
0.000u 0.050s 0:00.27 18.5% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse1 bs=1
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:47:53PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
Somewhat.
Mouse movement is OK, now. But...
1+0 Records aus
0.000u 3.090s 0:16.81 18.3% 0+0k 0+0io 153pf+0w
0.000u 0.050s 0:00.27 18.5% 0+0k 0+0io 122pf+0w
INSTALL/SOURCE time dd if=/dev/zero
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:27:25PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
No -aaX.
Right.
Maybe it _IS_ time for this _AND_ all the other data-logging patches?
Gello!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:32:49PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
OK some hand work...
Where comes this from?
It was there for a lot of time. Like for not less than 2 years, I'd say.
I don't find it my tree:
reiserfs quota patch got rid of it.
Here's relevant part of my diff:
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to
2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included).
Maybe it _IS_ time for this _AND_ all the other data-logging patches?
2.4.22-pre5?
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 07:49:22PM +0200, Yasuo Iwakura wrote:
I have a IBM Deskstar 180GB Harddrive and I created a 172GB Reiser FS
partition, using drakconf (mdk-9.1-ger).
The Problem is, df show only 109GB, same with windows(samba) -
Windows says 108GB. (btw, the Bios thinks 130GB
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 07:51:01AM +0200, Trond Hagen wrote:
Thanks, but the Red Hat kernel is a 2.4.20 why isn't the fix merged in ?
Oops. I meant that the fix was merged into 2.4.21.
Bye,
Oleg
On Sat, 2003-07-05 at 13:46, Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003
Hello!
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:23:13PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
- If the device is detached while a filesystem is mounted, reiserfs gets a
whole lot of I/O errors (or worse) and immediately oopses. It would be
nice if reiserfs would handle this a bit more gracefully--it should at
least
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:14:08AM +0300, Jussi Vainionp?? wrote:
Apr 27 20:18:06 un kernel: journal-601, buffer write failed
I do not know who to blame here. Try to heavily write to loop device
itself (without using
reiserfs) to see if something will break? Or bettr yet - upgrade to
Hello!
Yes, I know that 2.4.22-pre3 is not out yet, but Marcelo have accepted our somewhat
big patches
and so you can get replacement patches from
ftp://namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/data-logging-and-quota-2.4.22-pre3
once 2.4.22-pre3 is out ;)
Also starting from
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 04:38:00PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
I was looking in the wrong direction, when I produced that patch,
so it will produce zero output.
I hope to come up with ultimate fix soon enough. ;)
Well, there is a patch below that does *not* work for me ;)
But it should
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:07:05AM -0700, Fong Vang wrote:
Once the write to the file is CLOSED the file should not be modifiable in
any way. It should not be writeable by root. Ideally, this should be
across reboot and across kernel. The current requirement is that as long as
the
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:23:07PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Most of these changes are in 2.4.21, which I've been using on an AMD64
Not the reiserfs_file_write() ones.
bit box for a while without any problems. The bug should be somewhere
else, it looks to me like these spots aren't
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:07:05AM -0700, Fong Vang wrote:
this doesn't seem to work on kernel 2.4.20. I did a chattr +i on file but
rm -rf (as root) on the file deletes it.
You need to mount with -o attrs mount option for extended attributes to work.
Bye,
Oleg
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 11:27:22AM -0600, 'Andreas Dilger' wrote:
this doesn't seem to work on kernel 2.4.20. I did a chattr +i on file but
rm -rf (as root) on the file deletes it.
That is a reiserfs bug then... I just tested it with ext3 and it worked as
expected.
No, it is
Hello!
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:22:00PM +0800, SteelRat wrote:
Can you help me.
How can i set quotas to reiserfs?
Patches for recent kernels (2.4.21+) are available at
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
Patches for 2.4.20 are available at
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 03:38:20PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
as stated before, the corruptions occur only on this very alpha machine,
Well, I still cannot build the kernel myself and still working on it.
(having make: *** [vmlinux] Error 139 and zero length vmlinux)
BTW, I
Hello!
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:42:24AM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
(/lib/modules/2.5.65/kernel/fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.ko): Invalid module format
lila:~# uname -a
Linux lila 2.5.65 #4 Wed Jun 25 00:48:46 CEST 2003 alpha GNU/Linux
i compiled the module with CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK=y.
shall i
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:16:27PM +0100, Nix wrote:
Jun 22 13:52:42 loki kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 0001
This is very strange address to oops on.
I'll say! Looks almost like it JMPed to a null pointer or something.
No, if
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:44:57PM +0200, Gyimesi Akos wrote:
I have just encountered a problem (?) with reiserfs on Linux 2.4.20. I wrote
the following (shortened) python code which produced an unkillable process:
#!/usr/bin/python
file=open(terabyte_length_file, w)
Hello!
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 03:08:39PM +0200, Till Gerken wrote:
I am not able to mount my ReiserFS partition as root partition with any kernel
later than 2.4.20-pre11. When trying, I get
read_super_block: can't find a reiserfs filesystem on (dev 03:00, block 64,
size 1024)
Are you
Hello!
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:29:26PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
I don't think snapshots are really needed. I would be perfectly content
with a semi-intelligent filesystem that would mark files as deleted in
the journal while leaving the file intact on the HD. As soon as the file
has
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:16:52AM +0200, Till Gerken wrote:
kernel (hd0,0)/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.21 root=/dev/hda1,rw hdc=ide-scsi pci=biosirq
idebus=66
I suggest you to replace the comma between root=/dev/hda1 and rw with space.
Bye,
Oleg
Hello!
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 11:16:05PM +0200, Felix E. Klee wrote:
I am using a ReiserFS 3.6 formatted IBM-DJSA-220-ATA-harddisk with SuSE
LINUX 8.2. Today, by using
badblocks -s /dev/hda under LINUX
and IBM/Hitachi's
Drive Fitness under DOS,
I found that the drive contains a
Hello!
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 08:56:32AM -0400, Bill Rees wrote:
My application is running with the Sun jdk 1.4.1_02 under Red Hat 9.0 and
I've received this error in dmesg:
Do you have any way to reproduce?
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0018
Hello!
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:09:31AM +0200, Fred -- Speed Up -- wrote:
How about the BitKeeper repositery : does it contain the latest 2.5 kernel sources
along with your Reiser4 developement patches ?
Yes, our reiser4-linux-2.5 bk reporsitory contain latest 2.5 kernels sources + patches
Hello!
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:07:27PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
This is after a hard (power switch) reboot (due to I/O errors). The
disk in question has about 125 GB of data on a single 200GB reiserfs
partition. Do people think the disk is toast, or is this possibly some
correctable
Hello!
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:11:18PM +0200, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
| Object: Can't set quotas with 2.4.21-pre5
| After we upgraded from 2.4.19-pre6 + quota patches , 2.4.21-pre5 +
data-logging and quota
| patches, we can't set quotas anymore.
|
| Have you enabled all
Hello!
Ok, so after some silence on this front, here is 2.4 and 2.5 versions of
mount options parser fixes I propose.
These fixes consist of:
When you pass some mount options at mount time, default mount options are not reset
if what you pass
does not change the defaults. (both
Hello!
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 02:45:29AM +0200, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
Object: Can't set quotas with 2.4.21-pre5
After we upgraded from 2.4.19-pre6 + quota patches , 2.4.21-pre5 + data-logging and
quota
patches, we can't set quotas anymore.
Have you enabled all the compatibility stuff
Hello!
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:22:50PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The system refused to mount it originally, so I ran just plain
--fix-fixable. It showed nothing wrong at all. By a fluke of terminals,
I have a copy of this first output
Hello!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:01:38PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
So, the beam of X-rays run through the memory module corrupting some bits?
;) This stuff should not have been written to disk, so probably
plain reboot should fix everything? Can you test that?
indeed after rebooting
Hello!
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:09:19AM +0100, Marius Reiner wrote:
not really a reiserfs issue:
When following the FAQ everything is fine, I set blocksize zu 4096 as
debugreiserfs told me, and don't get any bad blocks.
Good.
Nevertheless I'm a bit concerned about the ones, badblocks
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:04:26PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
For the simple cases (which also happen to be all we have right
now), yes, I think that my implementation is cleaner. It allows the
simple use of mutually exclusive options, through the no prefix, and
clearing of the
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:54:48AM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
# time reiserfsck -a /dev/sdb1
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x811 of format 3.6 with standard journal
Blocks (total/free): 143109020/59148009 by 4096 bytes
Filesystem is cleanly umounted
Replaying journal..
0
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Szabolcs Szasz wrote:
Wouldn' it be better to put (back? was it there? I can't
recall) to the Subject header an indication for filtered
spam?
The fact that now there is Spamassasin at work, actually
changes the behavior of my organic
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:32:11PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21 will soon be
updated with a new set of data logging and quota patches against
2.4.21-pre4
The data logging code is updated with another set of io stalling fixes,
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:22:16AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
It doesn't apply to my kernel setup [-pre4 + data-logging + preempt]
-- too many hunks failing in my eyes.
datalogging is just too big of a change.
Bye,
Oleg
Hello!
Vladimir have finally tracked the problem to a race between
two iget4 running on same file whose inode is not in cache.
The sequence of events is like this (UP case):
1st thread:
take inode_lock
search through inode cache, but found nothing.
alloc new inode, mark it
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:11:16AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
Is this fix safe for usage already?
work for me (tm) ;)
It will most probably will be replaced by iget5_locked, though.
Mmmh. I have some hangs within KDE 2.2.2 Konqueror when copying over
(existing) directory links for
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:00:33PM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
I still get a Segmentation fault when I want to untar a kernel source on
a fresh 512MB loop filesystem.
Does this help you?
Kind of.
It seems that inode_file_plugin(inode)-key_by_inode pointer is zero for one of inodes.
But I do
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:35:23AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
BTW, do the ReiserFS errors nowadays print out a usable partition
identification (like Chris actual data-logging patches perform at mount,
e.g.)?
Sometimes it does.
I mostly always have 2 partitions with ReiserFS
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:11:44PM -0500, Patrick O'Rourke wrote:
What happens is that we put both systems under a fixed work load and after
many hours system B will start consuming lots of swap and suffer degraded
performance. Through some kernel debugging we discovered that the 4K
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Anders Widman wrote:
So it would be possible to do some actions to 1) get some blocks back in the
described
way, 1.1) write to really bad blocks should have remaped them already here if
there is
a space in remap area 2) save bad blocks to
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:01:55AM +0100, Karl Mistelberger wrote:
Feb 11 08:02:54 nnk kernel: 3a:04: rw=1, want=26537940, limit=26529792
Feb 11 08:02:54 nnk kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
what does debugreiserfs /dev/your_device says?
Starting the system again
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:24:58AM +1300, Sam Vilain wrote:
Therefore, your reiserfsck has a bug. The whole point of a fsck is
Well, currently the logic is If we cannot read some block, that
usually means this is a badblock.
And so it prints the message. Of course more testing
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 10:49:28PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, right, well that explains it. It complained about block 524111,
which would be physical block number 2096444. This is off the end of
the block device, which only has 261 blocks.
Aha, so this is indeed the
Hello!
bread: Cannot read the block (524111).
Aborted
(none):~# dd if=/dev/hda of=/tmp/foo skip=524100 count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
(none):~# od -x /tmp/foo
000 6974 6e6f 7720 6c69 206c 6562 6920 636e
020 756c 6564 2064 6e69 7420 6568 6e20 7865
[... lots of very
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:41:46PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
but there is possible situations that will not generate disk activity,
but may cause your system to go-slow, if there you have some
unussual IO numbers while disk activity is moderate to low -
most likely same sweet
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:32:10PM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
Sigh, these were false hopes indeed.
I can reproduce it with 2.4.21-pre4, only it is now harder for some reason.
I've seen times-to-failure ranging from 20 minutes to 20+ hours (!).
Same here.
Chris: My current
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:38:16PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
Well, that certainly looks like a bug in mount options parsing code.
Edward and Oleg, please review and fix.
There is another decoded output that makes much more sence to me.
And it suggest something gone wrong within block
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:32:31PM +0100, Jochen Haemmerle wrote:
So, here it comes again!
Don't care about the warning this is the machine the errror occures!
I hope someone understands that sh*** because I don't!!!
Ok, looks like __make_request tries to call get_request, and there
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:49:29PM +0100, Jochen Haemmerle wrote:
Well, down there it is!!
Hm.
Strange stacktrace, I'd say.
Please also decode EIP line, may be you need to get never ksymoops for that.
(EIP 0010:[c01a62c0]Tainted: P)
BTW, what proprietary modules do you have
Hello!
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 07:18:16PM +0100, Francois-Rene Rideau wrote:
Hi! No hard disk crash today (I'm just disabling the DMA )- )
However, I've tried to make small reiserfs partitions,
and was annoyed at the journal taking a significant size of the disk:
32MB is 50% of my 64MB /boot
Hello!
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 05:53:31AM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
Title: IBM DTLA 307045 Hard disk crash
I bought this disk (46 GB) about two years ago. One of the best they
claimed.
[...]
What is the fucking MBTF of these drives?? Is it close to one year
like I experienced?
That is
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:02:02PM -0600, Jos? A. Guzm?n wrote:
I'm trying to get quotas working on 2.4.20.
So far they seem to work ok with the dec-3-2002 patches from:
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20/
with CONFIG_QFMT_V2.
However the patch from
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:00:19PM +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
higmem4GB / highmem64GB with pae or does it produce more overhead that
you mention below?
You get no advantage of course.
But lots of overhead. Rumours have it that 256M systems with highmem
enabled kernels (default
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:30:07PM +0100, Newsmail wrote:
Hi Oleg, as you remember I mentioned you about my loop-aes+lvm+reiserfs
problem, that leaves hung processes after them, and only a cold reboot
Yes. Unfortunatelly I only produced 2.4.20+crypto stuff kernel image and
now other
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:35:18PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote:
I'm currently using linux 2.4.20, and I'm wondering if it has support
for ordered writes, or if I would have to apply a patch.
You need to apply the patch.
Bye,
Oleg
Hello!
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:09:20PM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:
It is released as a patch against linux-2.5.58 kernel. It should also
work with current (January 16th) bk snapshot at
http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
This is mostly bug fixing release.
READ.ME file contains changelog.
Can
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:43:06AM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
Actually, right now, we still have that nasty bug every time we run quotacheck that
prenvent us from enabling them on several filerservers which is a big problem right
now (that's on 2.4.x)
Have you tried 2.4. without
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:35:59AM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
I am using the attached stess.sh script (probably from this mailinglist)
for creating load on a reiserfs filesystem, which forks 100
(read,write,delete) processes:
# mkreiserfs /dev/sda4
# mount /dev/sda4 /backup
#
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
| Have you tried 2.4. without Chris' datalogging patched, but with original short
| overflow fix?
Well, my question was more like a Plan B.
I think i did, and that it still crashed, always during the quotacheck,
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:51:00PM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
Hm. This resembles me something.
Can you reproduce the same problem if you apply patches from
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20/
These patches add quota support to reiserfs, but also
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:58:04PM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote:
I will extract relevant bits from the patch though.
I will send you short version without quota once it will be ready.
Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps?
I tested it locally and it works
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:48:52PM +0100, Bernhard Sadlowski wrote:
Ok, here is the patch, can you give it a try and see if it also helps?
I tested it locally and it works for me.
If you confirm everything is ok, I will try to get it into 2.4.21 in time.
At first glance it seems to
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:44:26PM -0500, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
And now I can reliably reproduce it. It has nothing to do with MD,
linear, raid, SMP, or unclean shutdowns.
I can reproduce this bug on a plain IDE disk partition in about three
hours on Linux 2.4.20 (compiled
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:08:26PM +0900, Vitaly Porotikov wrote:
Perhaps 3.x1c have not this bug, but I can't do any changes in my
system. I send it in hope to find some coding errors out (if this wasn't
before).
You you guessed right, this bug is long fixed.
Actually if you ever
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:01:42PM -0500, Bill Schrier wrote:
I am sending along both the --logfile and the core file from a recent
reiserfsck we were running on our Redhat 7.2 raidzone machine.
Can you say what exact version was that?
Also just before dumping core it should have
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 02:31:54PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
I have a server with 4G of RAM running ReiserFS for everything that matters.
It has 2G of swap space free, but so far I have not seen swap usage go above
1.6M (so in normal use I could turn off swap entirely and expect not
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:53:26AM +0500, Anton Erofeevskij wrote:
in reiserfs filesystem
time cat sd1 | ./a.out sd2
0.00user 0.05system 0:01.79elapsed 2%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (131major+43minor)pagefaults 0swaps
in ext2 filesystem
time cat sd1 |
Hello!
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 04:57:04PM +0100, Luis Gregorio Muniz Rodriguez wrote:
I have recently discovered that the journal can be placed on an external
device (i.e, `mkreiserfs --journal-device FILE'), but I haven't found
any doc about it.
If you do not use 2.5 kernels, you need to
Hello!
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 05:31:09PM +0100, Nick Wellnhofer wrote:
I'm using ReiserFS with the old 3.5 format on a web server. The system
has been running fine for 2 years. About 1 month ago I upgraded from
Linux 2.2.16 to 2.4.18 (SuSE 8.1 default kernel). Some weeks ago I got
Hello!
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:02:38PM -0800, Jason Mancini wrote:
Should I just erase and remake the symlink?
Yes, that would be the simpliest thing.
It wasn't like this in July (my last backup, *cough*).
Then somebody corrupted it, or may be even the drive itself.
reiserfsck is
Hello!
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:50:52PM -0600, Brian Tinsley wrote:
Is there a patchset available for journal relocation on a 2.4 kernel
(2.4.20 specifically)? I've seen reference to it in a few places but
have been unable to locate it.
Sure. Check out
Hello!
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:59:35PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
I have some servers that are giving inadequate disk performance for Maildir
mail spools. They are running kernel 2.4.19 (2.4.20 upgrade is planned) and
using ReiserFS for everything that's important.
May I ask what kind
1 - 100 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
