Re: [reiserfs-list] Corruption: --fix-fixable results in all nlink values = 0

2002-08-15 Thread Stefan Fleiter
Hi Vitaly! On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 Vitaly Fertman wrote: > Ah, I guess I know what happened. I think you have some fatal corruptions and > rebuild-tree is required. In this case check and fix-fixable do not perform > semantic check. Then reiserfsck should not start in fix-fixable mode when rebuil

Re: [reiserfs-list] Recovering a file system not found by utilities

2002-01-27 Thread Stefan Fleiter
Hi Vitaly! >> debugreiserfs *SEGFAULTED*. And it looks like he found 2 other bugs. > > The latest utils do not segfault in the same case. Everyone should use > ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/pre/reiserfsprogs-3.x.1b-pre1.tar.gz > > It is the best for now. pre-releases are are not tested we

Re: [reiserfs-list] Converting 3.5 format to 3.6 format.

2001-11-08 Thread Stefan Fleiter
Hi Nikita! On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 Nikita Danilov wrote: >> Thanks Anne, Nikita please put into faq that all NFS users should use the >> 2.4 kernel with format converted to 3.6. > > -conv is not going to help here: old files still have old stat-data and > no place to store generation counter. You

Re: [reiserfs-list] Checking a ReiserFS filesystem

2001-09-15 Thread Stefan Fleiter
Hi George! [reiserfsck] > I typed "yes" instead of "Yes" and it dumped out on me, without a message. > This is uncommon behaviour with many programs so please put a message > such as "User aborted reiserfsck" as I am used to typing "yes". I second this! > 3. How do I check for bad blocks? Don

Re: [reiserfs-list] I've screwed something up

2001-09-15 Thread Stefan Fleiter
Hi Elliott! > I did this: > > zarquon:~# badblocks -s -v -b 4096 /dev/sda4 > Checking for bad blocks in read-only mode > >From block 0 to 2192872 > Checking for bad blocks (read-only test): 8210 8210/ 2192872 > done > Pass completed, 1 bad blocks found. > > So looks like a bad block...now I ha

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.6 is out .. reiserfs patch needed ?

2001-07-12 Thread Stefan Fleiter
Hi Chris! On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Chris Mason wrote: > Bug fixes need testing, regardless of how correct they look. You are right, yes. But I think there often are patches sent to the Mailinglist you don't hear about for a long time and at least seem to have been lost. Dirk is one of those who ask

Re: [reiserfs-list] 2.4.6 is out .. reiserfs patch needed ?

2001-07-12 Thread Stefan Fleiter
Hi Dirk! On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Dirk Mueller wrote: >> --- dir.c~ Wed Jul 4 14:52:37 2001 >> +++ dir.cWed Jul 4 14:53:43 2001 [..] > This chunk is still missing in 2.4.7-pre6. Is it possible to submit this to > Linus ? You are perfectly right and for me it shows that there are some prob