Vitaly Fertman wrote:
For reiser4, would this do it?
in function *reiser4_master_open(aal_device_t *device) in
libreiser4/master.c
/* Reiser4 master super block is not found on the device. */
if (aal_strncmp(SUPER(master)->ms_magic, REISER4_MASTER_MAGIC,
sizeof(RE
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>On Friday 14 October 2005 16:07, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
>
>
>>On Friday 14 October 2005 15:07, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>
>>
>>>ok, I will add it.
>>>
>>>
>>Vitaly, is it possible to add labels to Reiser4 filesystems AFTER mkfs,
>>or only during mk
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
free.fr> writes:
I think the idea is "basically" great , and I would like to see such a feature
in reiser3 & reiser4...
Just IMHO ;)
JP
Well, I've checked the source and actually all the needed data were already in
place. I mean: the reiserfs_super_block
michael chang wrote:
>On 10/10/05, Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote (ao):
>>
>>
>>>Thanks for the suggestions guys...however I should have clarified that
>>>I no longer have the dead disk (long story...)
&
Christian Iversen wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2005 17:06, michael chang wrote:
On 10/10/05, Yiannis Mavroukakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello :-)
I had an LVM setup of three disks, and one of them went belly
up..Obvious thought is, use some
distro like R.I.P to reduce the
Hello :-)
I had an LVM setup of three disks, and one of them went belly
up..Obvious thought is, use some
distro like R.I.P to reduce the volume to two disks and try and salvage
what I could ..unfortunately reiser4 fsck could not find a superblock
(surprise surprise the disk that died had it) n
Peter Foldiak wrote:
Hans, in the interview you give the example:
cat /home/reiser/mp3s//childcat > /dev/dsp
to illustrate concatenation.
[...]
The convention (I think also approved(suggested?) by Linus at some
point) could be that where you say
/home/reiser/mp3s
you get a the file
Hi,
I'm running reiser4 on 2.6.11-mm4 at the moment. I compiled 2.6.13-mm1
(and subsequently a few more kernel version in-between) as a
replacement, only to find out that it blows up in my face when the root
fs is due to be mounted:
VFS: Cannot open root device "801" or unknown-block
Unable
Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
| devices, can run periodic background consistenc
Jos Houtman wrote:
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Jos Houtman wrote:
Hello list,
First of all, We are a website that provide picture albums to its
users.
At moment we host almost 2 million, which are served in 5 different
formats from icons to 700x500.
We store all there files on our NAS
Because I like to keep people happy, especially Valdis
Kletnieks, I'll repost my query from another email
account without a disclaimer..here we go.
==
>From the subject, you have probably already guessed
what I am about to ask..
Is quota working ok with vanilla 2.6.10 with ReiserFS?
Tha
From the subject, you have probably already guessed what I am about to
ask..
Is quota working ok with vanilla 2.6.10 with ReiserFS?
Thank you!
Note:__
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, pro
Alternatively, try the following. Go to slackware.com Grab a reiser3
enabled boot image and make a bootdisk.
If memory serves me right, this is the one you want
ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.slackware.com/slackware-10.0/kernels/ba
reacpi.i
Then, go into
ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.slack
>You state that "proven" is the same as "good", but why you do so
escapes me. In general, you can easily prove that black == white >(etc.)
by such illogical reasoning.
No I don't :) I merely say that "proven" does not equal good OR bad if a
distributor chooses to bundle the filesystem with a distr
>My reasoning mentioned a /required/, but not a /sufficient/ criterion.
>In other words: not before it is proven in the field will I consider it
for production use.
>Remember the Linux 2.2 reiserfs 3.5 NFS woes?
>Remember the early XFS-NFS woes?
>These are all reasons to avoid a shiny new file syst
Hello Matthias,
Your "proven" reasoning sounds a bit strange to me..Microsoft (aka major
distributor at least in my books) had her filesystems "in the field" for
ages, does this prove any of them good (or bad for that matter)?
I don't think I'd wait for a distributor to shove reiser4 down my
thr
Forgive my short-sightedness in this respect, but where's the benefit in this
approach?:)
-Original Message-
From: Markus Törnqvist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2004 09:36
To: Yiannis Mavroukakis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Does this look right?
On Mon, N
Am I completely loosing it ?
Using 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 allows me to go into a file as a directory when
the file has the executable flag...that shouldn't be happening, should
it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -l file
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 2004-11-29 13:50 file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cd file
[EMAIL PROTECT
I've been seeing people having trouble with reiser4 crashing and I'm jealous
:-) I want
mine to crash too, it's not fair I haven't had a spot of trouble since I
installed the
patches my Unreal Tournament server hasn't gone down once! :P :P :P
Yiannis.
-Original Message-
From: Vladimi
19 matches
Mail list logo
