Jens Benecke wrote:
Hi,
I just had a, er, 'lively' discussion with someone claiming ReiserFS is
crap because it hogs even the fastest CPU too much, and it uses 4x as much
processing power to do metadata operations, and in general is slower
because of the journal. My benchmarks don't
On Saturday 30 June 2001 20:29, Jens Benecke wrote:
I just had a, er, 'lively' discussion with someone claiming ReiserFS is
crap because it hogs even the fastest CPU too much, and it uses 4x as
much processing power to do metadata operations, and in general is
slower because of the journal.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Jens Benecke wrote:
Hi,
I just had a, er, 'lively' discussion with someone claiming ReiserFS is
crap because it hogs even the fastest CPU too much, and it uses 4x as much
processing power to do metadata operations, and in general is slower
because
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 06:25:18PM -0400, Jean-Francois Landry wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:29:04PM +0200, Jens Benecke wrote:
I just had a, er, 'lively' discussion with someone claiming ReiserFS
is crap because it hogs even the fastest CPU too much, and it
uses 4x as much processing
