Hello!
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:16:35PM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote:
Are these patches available outside of bitkeeper, and if so, where are
they located?
Yes, they are at http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/2003.08.22 , as somebody
pointed out already.
I just forgot to mention the URL.
This needs to be fixed - it doesn't compile
GCC version is 3.3.1
CC fs/reiser4/txnmgr.o
fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:3326: error: parse error before do
fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:3332: error: parse error before do
fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:3343: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration
of `pos_in_atom'
David Nielsen writes:
This needs to be fixed - it doesn't compile
Oops. As a work around, please, turn on REISER4_DEBUG_OUTPUT (Printing
in reiser4 debug option sub menu).
GCC version is 3.3.1
Nikita.
CC fs/reiser4/txnmgr.o
Not enough to just enable printing - and your code throws so many
warnings it's close to being scary (truely alpha... I love it)
I think the hack around would be to disable syscall support if I'm
correct?
fs/reiser4/sys_reiser4.c:54:32: parser/parser.code.c: No such file or
directory
David Nielsen writes:
Not enough to just enable printing - and your code throws so many
warnings it's close to being scary (truely alpha... I love it)
This is for really adventurous. :)
I think the hack around would be to disable syscall support if I'm
correct?
yes.
The entire thing then fails with these messages - no notable compile
errors or warnings present.
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9a8cd): In function `print_context':
: undefined reference to `info_atom'
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9e392): In function `commit_current_atom':
: undefined reference to `info_atom'
Am Sa, 2003-08-23 um 01.47 schrieb David Nielsen:
The entire thing then fails with these messages - no notable compile
errors or warnings present.
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9a8cd): In function `print_context':
: undefined reference to `info_atom'
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9e392): In function
I worked around this by adding an empty info_atom in reiser4/txnmgr.c :
void
info_atom(const char *prefix, txn_atom * atom)
{
return;
}
After that, reiser4 compiles and is running without problem here so
far (just tried a few minutes of fsx-linux and a few small compilations.
I'll
Could I ask you guys to stop CCing me, I'm on the list - filling my
inbox with dupes is cruel :)
- David
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 02:25, Vince wrote:
I worked around this by adding an empty info_atom in reiser4/txnmgr.c :
void
info_atom(const char *prefix, txn_atom * atom)
{
return;
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
I have just released new snapshot of reiser4.
Release notes follows.
Give it a try.
Reiser4 snapshot for 2003.08.22
WARNING!!! This code is experimental! WE ARE NOT KIDDING! DO NOT PUT
ANY VALUABLE DATA ON REISER4 YET!
Fixed builds for 64bit arches (there are
David Nielsen wrote:
The entire thing then fails with these messages - no notable compile
errors or warnings present.
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9a8cd): In function `print_context':
: undefined reference to `info_atom'
fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9e392): In function `commit_current_atom':
: undefined
Tupshin Harper wrote:
Are these patches available outside of bitkeeper, and if so, where are
they located?
http://thebsh.namesys.com/snapshots/
:j
I'd like to second that, patches against -mm would be a very good option.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 02:25:59 +0200, Vince wrote:
(...)
Sidenote to reiserfs devels : if the merge in mainstream is still far
away, is any integration of reiser4 into the -mm serie considered ? It
would ease testing a
13 matches
Mail list logo
