Alex Zarochentsev wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:34:11PM +, Szabolcs Illes wrote:
Hi All,
I have been using reiser4fs for 4 months without any problem since
today. After tryinig to open a movie with mplayer a have this in my log:
no other reiser4 messages in the log for 4 months?
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:34:11PM +, Szabolcs Illes wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been using reiser4fs for 4 months without any problem since
> today. After tryinig to open a movie with mplayer a have this in my log:
no other reiser4 messages in the log for 4 months? like delimiting keys
mis
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 02:18, David Masover wrote:
> Christian Iversen wrote:
> | On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:52, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
> |>On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:37:13AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> |>>>Could reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be more
> |>>>"windows-native"?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Iversen wrote:
| On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:52, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
|
|>On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:37:13AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
|>
|>>>Could reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be more
|>>>"windows-native"?
|>>
|>>It could,
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:52, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:37:13AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >>Could reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be more
> >> "windows-native"?
> >
> >It could, as a plugin.
>
> Reiser4 has a sys interface already, why not add echo 1 > c
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:37:13AM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
>>Could reiser4 support case-crushing, so it would be more "windows-native"?
>It could, as a plugin.
Reiser4 has a sys interface already, why not add echo 1 > case_crush or
somesuch? Shouldn't take a long time to code, but it shouldn't
Philip Miller wrote:
> David Masover wrote:
>> Also, is it a given that reiser4 for windows would work without help
>> from MS? I've just never seen a third-party filesystem driver for
>> windows. You'd think that at least one other filesystem, one of the
>> Linux/BSD/etc ones, would have done t
David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
| David Masover wrote:
|
|> Hans Reiser wrote:
|> [...]
|> |
|> |>
|> |> To start with, ntfs read access is still case insensitive, last I
|> |> checked. How deep does that go?
|> |
|> |
|> | In reiser4, it is just a directory plugin.
|>
|> Nono -- how do y
Christian Iversen wrote:
On Monday 17 January 2005 17:46, Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
[...]
|> To start with, ntfs read access is still case insensitive, last I
|> checked. How deep does that go?
|
| In reiser4, it is just a directory plugin.
Nono -- how do y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
| David Masover wrote:
|
|> Hans Reiser wrote:
|> [...]
|> |
|> |>
|> |> To start with, ntfs read access is still case insensitive, last I
|> |> checked. How deep does that go?
|> |
|> |
|> | In reiser4, it is just a directory plugi
On Monday 17 January 2005 17:46, Hans Reiser wrote:
> David Masover wrote:
> > Hans Reiser wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > |> To start with, ntfs read access is still case insensitive, last I
> > |> checked. How deep does that go?
> > |
> > | In reiser4, it is just a directory plugin.
> >
> > Nono -- how
David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
[...]
|
|>
|> To start with, ntfs read access is still case insensitive, last I
|> checked. How deep does that go?
|
|
| In reiser4, it is just a directory plugin.
Nono -- how do you give Windows, which is case insensitive, access to a
case-sensitive filesys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
[...]
|
|>
|> To start with, ntfs read access is still case insensitive, last I
|> checked. How deep does that go?
|
|
| In reiser4, it is just a directory plugin.
Nono -- how do you give Windows, which is case insensitive, access to
David Masover wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
| I should add that reiser4 for windows would be proprietary. If they
| can pay MS, they can pay me, and I see no reason to do free work for MS.
Don't think too highly of the Cygwin project, do you? Oh, and it's
almost impossible to get a laptop without pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gagan Rajpal wrote:
| Hi,
|
| What plugins are currently available for reiser4? Is an acl plugin
| available. I am planning to use reiser4 for all my filesystems, is it
| stable enough for production work.
Depends who you ask. It's already been shown
Hi,
For some reason mails to the mailinglist don't make it. Also not to the
archives, but I got no error back yet.
And www.namesys.com was unreachable this morning (GMT+1).
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao):
> On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 20:37, Sander wrote:
> > Tomorrow morning I'll reinstall (and reform
Hello
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 20:37, Sander wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Tomorrow morning I'll reinstall (and reformat to reiser3) a dual Opteron
> which has a troublesome reiser4 fs.
>
> Should I run some tests, or retrieve some debug info from the reiser4 fs
> before I reformat?
Please describe the
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao):
> On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 21:32, Sander wrote:
> > Does this update make reiser4 ready for Opteron systems?
> >
> This update does not contain anything specific for Opteron.
> Do you have any problmes with reiser4 on it?
I'm afraid so, yes. bonnie++ is oke, but an idle
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just an FYI, we are still figuring it out. andrew, you might note it in
> release notes, especially if we don't fix it before your next release.
I'd try reverting simplified-readahead*.patch.
Thanks Laurent. Grev, please update the webpage.
Hello,
I applied reiser4-update-for-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-2.gz on top of my
2.6.10-rc3-mm1 tree and then tried to compile :
linux-2.6$ make
[...]
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST
*** Warning: "find_get_pages" [fs/reiser4/reiser4.ko] undefined!
*** Warning: "find_get_pages_tag" [fs/reiser4/reiser4.ko
Hello.
Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
you can get latest reiser4 for 2.6.10 (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10/reiser4-for-2.6.10-1.gz)
and update for 2.6.10-rc3-mm1 (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10-rc3-mm1/reiser4-update-for-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-1.gz).
sorry, this is v
Hello
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 21:32, Sander wrote:
> Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao):
> > you can get latest reiser4 for 2.6.10
> > (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10/reiser4-for-2.6.10-1.gz)
> > and update for 2.6.10-rc3-mm1
> > (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10-rc3-mm1/
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao):
> you can get latest reiser4 for 2.6.10
> (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10/reiser4-for-2.6.10-1.gz)
> and update for 2.6.10-rc3-mm1
> (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10-rc3-mm1/reiser4-update-for-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-1.gz).
Thank you all! Was
Alex Zarochentsev wrote (ao):
> > Can somebody please point me to a patch to disable the file as a
> > directory feature?
>
> it is disabled in the recent reiser4 code.
That means the latest -mm (not 2.6.10-rc3-mm1) will contain the patch
too?
> mount options 'nopseudo' should work for older ver
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:12:39PM +0100, Sander wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
> > On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:28:15 +0100, Sander said:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
> > > > For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with "more scalability
> > > > and administration" is The Right
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
> On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:28:15 +0100, Sander said:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
> > > For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with "more scalability
> > > and administration" is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT*
> > > include lots of odd new featu
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:28:15 +0100, Sander said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
> > For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with "more scalability
> > and administration" is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT*
> > include lots of odd new features and quirks that might break
> > prod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
> For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with "more scalability
> and administration" is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT*
> include lots of odd new features and quirks that might break
> production code (remember the joys in getting Apache running on
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:46:08 PST, Job Bob said:
> So if ZFS is not the vaporware that WinFS is, what
> new features of ZFS are worth incorporating into
> Reiser fs? Will Reiser fs continue to stay ahead of
> ZFS?
This of course depends in a *large* part on how exactly you define "ahead".
For m
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:27:41AM -0600, Chris Cox wrote:
> ZFS is vaporware at the moment. A marketing blurb,
> not a released product. An alpha version will probably
> come for Solaris 10 about mid year... not sure when
> it will be "blessed" for production use.
Isn't ZFS yet released as part
Job Bob wrote:
...
So if ZFS is not the vaporware that WinFS is, what
new features of ZFS are worth incorporating into
Reiser fs? Will Reiser fs continue to stay ahead of
ZFS?
ZFS is vaporware at the moment. A marketing blurb,
not a released product. An alpha version will probably
come for Sola
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:38:08PM -0600, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Spam wrote:
> |>On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 22:07 -0800, Jiri Klouda wrote:
> |>
> |>>>Also, is it a given that reiser4 for windows would work without help
> |>>>from MS? I've just never
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spam wrote:
|>On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 22:07 -0800, Jiri Klouda wrote:
|>
|>>>Also, is it a given that reiser4 for windows would work without help
|>>>from MS? I've just never seen a third-party filesystem driver for
|>>>windows. You'd think that at leas
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 22:07 -0800, Jiri Klouda wrote:
>> > Also, is it a given that reiser4 for windows would work without help
>> > from MS? I've just never seen a third-party filesystem driver for
>> > windows. You'd think that at least one other filesystem, one of the
>> > Linux/BSD/etc one
David Masover wrote:
Also, is it a given that reiser4 for windows would work without help
from MS? I've just never seen a third-party filesystem driver for
windows. You'd think that at least one other filesystem, one of the
Linux/BSD/etc ones, would have done this, if it was feasable.
Have a look
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 22:07 -0800, Jiri Klouda wrote:
> > Also, is it a given that reiser4 for windows would work without help
> > from MS? I've just never seen a third-party filesystem driver for
> > windows. You'd think that at least one other filesystem, one of the
> > Linux/BSD/etc ones, woul
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 22:54 -0600, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hans Reiser wrote:
> | I should add that reiser4 for windows would be proprietary. If they
> | can pay MS, they can pay me, and I see no reason to do free work for MS.
>
> Don't thin
> Also, is it a given that reiser4 for windows would work without help
> from MS? I've just never seen a third-party filesystem driver for
> windows. You'd think that at least one other filesystem, one of the
> Linux/BSD/etc ones, would have done this, if it was feasable.
You might be onto somet
Tierra wrote:
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:31:29 -0700, Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are ext2/3 and reiserfs access programs for Windows. They are not
implemented as Windows filesystem drivers. I do not know if this is
because of technical difficulties or Windows vs. GPL licensin
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:31:29 -0700, Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are ext2/3 and reiserfs access programs for Windows. They are not
> implemented as Windows filesystem drivers. I do not know if this is
> because of technical difficulties or Windows vs. GPL licensing problems.
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 13:10 -0800, Job Bob wrote:
> I know that this question has a fairly obvious
> answer, but is there or will there be a reiser4 driver
> for Windows? Microsoft will only make one if enough
> people use reiser4, otherwise hell will freeze before
> they do. The free software pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando wrote:
| Hans Reiser wrote:
|
|> I should add that reiser4 for windows would be proprietary. If they
|> can pay MS, they can pay me, and I see no reason to do free work for MS.
|>
| Hans,
|
|Despite about this. The MS domin
Hans Reiser wrote:
I should add that reiser4 for windows would be proprietary. If they
can pay MS, they can pay me, and I see no reason to do free work for MS.
Hans,
Despite about this. The MS dominance is going down, and therefore
have no sense.
I never suppose you will found the sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
| I should add that reiser4 for windows would be proprietary. If they
| can pay MS, they can pay me, and I see no reason to do free work for MS.
Don't think too highly of the Cygwin project, do you? Oh, and it's
almost impossible t
I should add that reiser4 for windows would be proprietary. If they
can pay MS, they can pay me, and I see no reason to do free work for MS.
Job Bob wrote:
I know that this question has a fairly obvious
answer, but is there or will there be a reiser4 driver
for Windows?
Depends on how many people buy the repacker for reiser4. If a lot do,
or some other money source appears, then I can afford projects like
creating a windows port.
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 00:58:28 PST, BLuEGoD said:
> Hi, i want to know how to install reiser4 on root with only 1 HD.. I use
> mkfs.reiser4 from the reiser4 utils after compile and install kernel & patches
> on a debian woody 2.2.. with a scsi HD, but it crashes (errors found doing
> mkfs.reiser4 o
Hello
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 18:35, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 11:58, BLuEGoD wrote:
> > Hi, i want to know how to install reiser4 on root with only 1 HD.. I use
> > mkfs.reiser4 from the reiser4 utils after compile and install kernel &
> > patches on a debian wo
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 06:35:22PM +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
>
>You need a spare partition on that HD.
>mkfs.reiser4 it
>mount it /mnt (you need kernel with reiser4 support here)
>cp -ax / /mnt
>edit /mnt/etc/fstab
>make changes in your boot loader. This is the most tricky part.
>reboot with
Hello
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 11:58, BLuEGoD wrote:
> Hi, i want to know how to install reiser4 on root with only 1 HD.. I use
> mkfs.reiser4 from the reiser4 utils after compile and install kernel &
> patches on a debian woody 2.2.. with a scsi HD, but it crashes (errors found
> doing mkfs.reis
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:47:51 +0200, it was written ...
>Anyway, I just prefer to try have things working but cut down on the
>fiddling, rather just report when something breaks :)
Vanilla 2.6.9 + 2.6.9-ck3 + latest 2.6.9 reiser4 (#2) patches, builds
and boots clean and easy,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:42:25AM +1100, Cal wrote:
> >I also edited as said above and kicked in a new compile...
>Yeah, me too.
Which I'm still waiting for ;)
>With the amount of work these guys are putting into it all, I wouldn't
>dare to suggest what's warranted. I'm content to fiddle about
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:28:26 +0200, it was written ...
>>Have a look at
>> 2.6.10-rc1-mm3/broken-out/reiser4-generic_acl-fix.patch.
>>Around line 16 of fs/reiser4/plugin/security/perm.c, return
>>vfs_permission(inode, mask); replaces
>> return generic_permission(ino
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:14:44AM +1100, Cal wrote:
> >fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9da81): In function `mask_ok_common':
> >: undefined reference to `vfs_permission'
> >make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
> >make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.9-cko4a'
> >make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
>Ha
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:21:19 +0200, it was written ...
...
>Anyway, my compile just failed:
>
>fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9da81): In function `mask_ok_common':
>: undefined reference to `vfs_permission'
>make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:00:59AM +1100, Cal wrote:
>
>Both of those patches appear to be from the mm series. They're in
>2.6.10-rc2-mm2 and 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 (at least), and have generous
>comments at their head regarding their purpose.
OK, I admit I didn't read through them :)
But they don't see
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:48:32 +0200, it was written ...
>I checked the patches, from Piotr's broken-out cko3 which he kindly
>gave me.
>
>#needed by reiser4
>make-tree_lock-an-rwlock.patch.bz2
>invalidate_inodes-speedup.patch.bz2
>
>What are those? Are they merged?
Bot
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 01:23:43PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
>
>I don't remember if I mentioned it, but there were two patches
>from Piotr Neuman's -cko that were required by Reiser4 (according
>to him) but seemed to patch well onto vs's patched system...
>
>Can anyone give any info on this?
>
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:55:16 +0300, it was written ...
>> >ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
>
>There was an update today. Please make sure you got patch number 2.
>
The 2.6.9 patch #2 works just fine - thanks all!
cheers, Cal
riginal Message-
From: Vladimir Saveliev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 November 2004 16:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Markus Törnqvist; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reiser4 crash
Hello
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 15:35, Cal wrote:
> --
> and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:05:45 +0
Hello
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 15:35, Cal wrote:
> --
> and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:05:45 +0200, it was written ...
> >ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
There was an update today. Please make sure you got patch number 2.
> >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=110
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:05:45 +0200, it was written ...
>ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=110121057720746&w=2
>
>It is possible the posted patch is included in the second patch
>at namesys.
>
>I'd still like to kn
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:42:12PM +1100, Cal wrote:
>
>While I search for the link to said patches, can you point me to
>them?
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=110121057720746&w=2
It is possible the posted patch is included in the second
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:23:43 +0200, it was written ...
>Did you try vs's patches?
While I search for the link to said patches, can you point me to
them?
cheers, Cal
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:19:19PM +1100, Cal wrote:
>This occurs with 2.6.10-rc2-mm2, 2.6.10-rc2-mm3. It's nastier than
>you might think. After the BUG, the system slowly sinks into fatal
>decline, losing screen i/o, keyboard response, eventually just
>locking up completely.
Did you try vs's p
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:54:10 +0300, it was written ...
>
>Which kernel do you use?
>
>> Sami
...
>> kernel BUG at fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:32!
>> invalid operand: [#1]
>> PREEMPT
...
>> EFLAGS: 00210286 (2.6.10-rc1)
>> EIP is at get_exclusive
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:54:10AM +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:47, Sami Liedes wrote:
> > Attached are the oops and fsck.reiser4 output.
> >
> > This happened after using reiser4 for only 1,5 days.
> >
>
> Which kernel do you use?
2.6.10-rc1.
Sami
Hello
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:47, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Attached are the oops and fsck.reiser4 output.
>
> This happened after using reiser4 for only 1,5 days.
>
Which kernel do you use?
> Sami
>
>
> --- oops ---
> kernel BUG at fs/reiser
--
and then at Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:41:24 +, it was written ...
>"Re: 2.6.10-rc2-mm1: oops when accessing reiser4 fs's(maybe fix
>provided)" on this very same list, since Mathieu Segaud seemed to
>have >problems similar to mine. This did indeed fix my bootup
>oopsing proble
i have quite some machines running with 2.6.9-rc4-mmSomething, with
reiser4, running perfectly, (2 of them with reiser4 as root fs) they
have like 4 days in uptime, average. (since quite often there are
rebooted to test stuff in another install)
my workstation, reiser4 as storage, it runs perfect,
--
and then at Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:12:02 -0800, it was written ...
>
> Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went
> out, there is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if
> any kernel with -mm patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all
> people are losin
I don't have so much problem as using it as a storage FS, I use reiser3
for my root filesystem, couldn't trust that, I wouldn't give it a risk
such as apache bugs before, pretty unstable tho, I have a 200GB and a
160GB HD using as non-root folder for storage, nothing crash but the
repacker sucks, H
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:12:02PM -0800, BLuEGoD wrote:
>
> Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there
> is no one that run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm
> patches runs well?.. I think nowadays all people are losing time with
Apart from m
BLuEGoD wrote:
Hi, I want to run a debian with reiser4, but since reiser4 went out, there is no one that
run it without problems, anyone knows if any kernel with -mm patches runs well?.. I think
nowadays all people are losing time with reiser4, because I read that reiser4 comes
without anything
On 11/19/04 15:44:01, Cal wrote:
and then at Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:42:45 +0100, it was written ...
Could you try 2.6.10-rc2-mm2, reiser4 is pretty stable in this
tree, and >contains more fix bits.
Didn't have the time yet, but seems Cal has..
Lost in the alchemy, I didn't notice the update, so th
and then at Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:42:45 +0100, it was written ...
>Could you try 2.6.10-rc2-mm2, reiser4 is pretty stable in this tree,
and >contains more fix bits.
Lost in the alchemy, I didn't notice the update, so thanks for the
update pointer. The problem still happens in 2.6.10-rc2-mm2:-
kern
Cal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que :
> >However, should anyone more knowledgable about reiser4 have any
> ideas >as to what's causing this oops, I'd be more than happy to
> debug a >little further.
>
> Just so you don't feel so alone: I'm having the same problems
> (apt-get upda
>However, should anyone more knowledgable about reiser4 have any
ideas >as to what's causing this oops, I'd be more than happy to
debug a >little further.
Just so you don't feel so alone: I'm having the same problems
(apt-get update), so you're not alone. I haven't spoken up earlier
because
On 11/16/04 23:55:53, Kacper Wysocki wrote:
Hello,
I decided to try out reiser4 yesterday, when I got a new harddrive
for my laptop. In the process, I had some terrible problems, and gave
up after a good full day of trying to make it work.
[snip]
Steps to reproduce: run 'apt-get update' (or any apt
I've used by vanilla 2.6.9 kernel sources with the 1.0.2 reiser4 patch
from Jake who also subscribes to this list. Here is his patch
http://people.msoe.edu/~maciejej/patches/
I've also tried the latest 2.6.10-rc1 mm sources, but I noticed on the
list this morning that you guys missed getting an u
Before I head off to bed, I was able to obtain a better log of a
segfault. After rebooting from the problem I had with zombie threads,
I tried restarting my kernel compilation. It died right away. Here
is the end of the kernel file
bash-2.05b# ls
current log-2004-11-08-08:16:05 log-2004-11-09
Here is an error for you all. From my /var/log/everything log.
---
Nov 10 00:30:01 [/usr/sbin/cron] (root) CMD (test -x /usr/sbin/run-crons && /usr
/sbin/run-crons )
- Last output repeated 2 times -
Nov 10 00:50:58 [kernel] reiser4[g++(10858)]: check_dkeys (fs/
Vladimir,
> Do i understand correctly that you have a source code tar ball which can
> not be built in reiser4 filesystem? Where can i find it?
Where you able to download my files, or test them from somewhere else?
How else can I help right now. I'm not sure how to help troubleshoot
at the mom
that's an interesting idea. Format a filesystem just for my
webserver. It could help in the testing. In the back of my mind I'm
still not sure if that would help though. I mean I had it lock up the
otherday when scp'ing files from my machine to another. Then the php
coincident, which I know is
Alright. I got php installed using a loopback device formated at
ext2. However in installing xoops php webpage stuff, it craped out
and I got a segfault again.
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 20:11:54 +0200, Markus Törnqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Jeremy West
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Jeremy West wrote:
>Ok. I wouldn't call myself a linux newbie by any means. However,
>I've never had to do console logging or network logging. Are there
>some good docs somewhere on how to set this up?
Network logging is well-documented in the kernel so
Well the subject line is rather pointless now. When I started the
thread, my assumption was that my system was freezing because I had
two partitions with reiser4 and reiserfs. It's clearly obvious now
that this has never been the problem. This is a problem with the php
build process. Something
I've enabled all the reiser4 debugging options (assertions, dirtying,
memory copying, node consistency, node zeroing, tracing, log events,
statistics, and printing)
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:57:54 +0200, Markus Törnqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 12:53:41PM -0500, Jeremy We
Ok. I wouldn't call myself a linux newbie by any means. However,
I've never had to do console logging or network logging. Are there
some good docs somewhere on how to set this up?
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:57:02 +0100, Spam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Funny thing is I did what you suggest
Michael Barry wrote:
Of course ReiserFS and Reiser4 will work on different partitions at the
same time.
This is the object of these emails ?
Thanks,
Giovanni
--
--
--
Check FT Websites ... http://www.futuretg.com - ftp://ftp.futuretg.com
http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com
http://www.FTLinuxCourse.c
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 12:53:41PM -0500, Jeremy West wrote:
>Funny thing is I did what you suggested, enabling all the debugging,
>but it still freezes. Not immediately, but it still hangs. First I
>get a segfault on any command I type into the console. After 10 secs
>or so of this, It will fre
> Funny thing is I did what you suggested, enabling all the debugging,
> but it still freezes. Not immediately, but it still hangs. First I
> get a segfault on any command I type into the console. After 10 secs
> or so of this, It will freeze up. How in the world did you save that
> stack
It comes up in my log files. I can't remeber which one off the top of my head.
Mike
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:53:41 -0500, Jeremy West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny thing is I did what you suggested, enabling all the debugging,
> but it still freezes. Not immediately, but it still hangs. Firs
Funny thing is I did what you suggested, enabling all the debugging,
but it still freezes. Not immediately, but it still hangs. First I
get a segfault on any command I type into the console. After 10 secs
or so of this, It will freeze up. How in the world did you save that
stack trace. I've se
This is the exact same problem I am having. I just bumped the thread
actually. If you enable debig mode instead of your system freezing you
will get a stack trace. That trace is available in my thread labeled
possible bug: clog 0.
Mike
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:41:25 -0500, Jeremy West <[EMAIL PROTE
Yes, I have a source code tarball that can't be built correctly. You
can get this file from other places, but it might be best to test
exactly what I'm using. I'm building php, and applying this patch.
www.jeremysplace.org/php-4.3.9.tar.bz2
http://www.jeremysplace.org/php-4.3.6-includepath.diff
Hello
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 10:16, Jeremy West wrote:
> Ok. I think I may have found a glitch in reiser4. It seems that my
> freezing coincidentally happened every time I tried installing php.
> Each time my system froze, the php build would crap out at the same
> point. Basically the bulid wo
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:16:46AM -0500, Jeremy West wrote:
>
>So ... it seems to me that reiser4 is having some issues handling
>segfault events. I'm not sure how to tell what caused the segfault.
>I don't think it's memory, because it happens in the same spot of the
>build every time. I've do
Ok. I think I may have found a glitch in reiser4. It seems that my
freezing coincidentally happened every time I tried installing php.
Each time my system froze, the php build would crap out at the same
point. Basically the bulid would say that it was running the
pear-installer program, then gi
1101 - 1200 of 1426 matches
Mail list logo
