Christian Trefzer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:01:42AM -0400, David Masover wrote:
A warning isn't good? Would you rather it be an error?
Of course not. It merely appears inconsistent to offer a root fs choice
that may cause severe problems at bootup time.
When I went to install my first
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:01:42AM -0400, David Masover wrote:
> A warning isn't good? Would you rather it be an error?
Of course not. It merely appears inconsistent to offer a root fs choice
that may cause severe problems at bootup time.
When I went to install my first SuSE (brand-new 6.1 at tha
Christian Trefzer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:09:42PM -0400, David Masover wrote:
Christian Trefzer wrote:
Few people keep a 32MB ext2 for /boot purposes these days, so it
really is imperative that grub can read kernel images off a reiser4
/.
I think there are patches, but I do keep a 32
Hello David,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 2:05:23 AM, you wrote:
> Under what, though? I don't want MS crap on my OS X (need that for work
> ATM), and I can't imagine they've ported it to Linux. I have no reason
> to boot Windows except for games, and if I was going to do that, I may
> as well shrin
On 8/8/06, Christian Trefzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grub is a bootloader and as such should (as an optimum) be able to grab
kernels off of any fs. I guess patches are accepted by upstream
developers?
Grub v1 (The one we all know) is alpha status according to their devs.
Its no longer under
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:09:42PM -0400, David Masover wrote:
> Christian Trefzer wrote:
> > Few people keep a 32MB ext2 for /boot purposes these days, so it
> > really is imperative that grub can read kernel images off a reiser4
> > /.
>
> I think there are patches, but I do keep a 32 meg ext3 f
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 20:05 -0400, David Masover wrote:
> Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
> > Hello David,
> >
> > Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 1:23:01 AM, you wrote:
> >> Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
> > Well, both MS Virtual PC and VMWare are free of charge, so in
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 1:23:01 AM, you wrote:
Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
Well, both MS Virtual PC and VMWare are free of charge, so installing
is a real snap.
Under what, though? I don't want MS crap on my
Hello David,
Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 1:23:01 AM, you wrote:
> Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
Well, both MS Virtual PC and VMWare are free of charge, so installing
is a real snap.
> Not to nitpick, but isn't that emulation? Or have they actually done
> r
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
hi
I have built today an r4-patched ubuntu kernel package (yes, debs!)
Sounds good. I don't have an ubuntu to test with at the moment, though.
Please note, that this is done all under virtualization
(Microsoft Virtual PC).
Not to nitpick, but isn't
Hello David,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 7:09:42 PM, you wrote:
> I mean, having Grub support everything would be nice, but if you're
> reformatting anyway, I don't think it's that imperative.
I have come up to that conclusion too. If someone would be getting
an r4-enabled kernel on an already install
Christian Trefzer wrote:
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:23:16PM +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
There also is an issue with grub. The kernel alone is fine for creating
partitions
(or loop devices) but with grub not patched we can't install boot partitions.
No biggy,
I guess, but still a problem.
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 04:23:16PM +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
> I tried to create a kernel package with reiser4 for ubuntu-server (dapper)
> They ship a 2.6.15 (heavily modified) kernel upon which the current
> reiser4-for-2.6.17-3.patch applies fine but unfortunately miscompiles, eg.
> fs/reis
> I know it is very easy to create ubuntu kernel packages (I have done a few)
> I might try to do one for current dapper kernel for i386. But it would have
> to wait due to time my personal constraints (projects, etc.)
Answering myself...
I tried to create a kernel package with reiser4 for ubuntu-
On 03/08/06, Maciej Sołtysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>It's quite late for inclusion in the next Ubuntu release, but who knows.
Maybe it is not, it's a playground, Mark would not hesitate to postpone
Edgy's release if it requires polishing the whole thing due to "edgy"
features.
> Could you
>>It's quite late for inclusion in the next Ubuntu release, but who knows.
Maybe it is not, it's a playground, Mark would not hesitate to postpone
Edgy's release if it requires polishing the whole thing due to "edgy"
features.
> Could you contact him for us, and ask? It is more convincing when us
Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 10:55 schrieb Marcel Hilzinger:
>
>
>>Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>[...]
>>
>>
>>
>>>Are there any on the list who know o
Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 10:55 schrieb Marcel Hilzinger:
> Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
> > On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for Suse/Redhat/Mandrake
> > that include reiser4?
One
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 23:59 schrieb Sander Sweers:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
[...]
> Are there any on the list who know of rpm's for Suse/Redhat/Mandrake
> that include reiser4?
Suse excluded reiser4 from 10.1 because they want to keep the kernel "cleaner"
Sander Sweers wrote:
>
>
>With the approval of Namesys I would like to add a new entry to the wiki
>frontpage.
>
It would be very appreciated.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
> Hello Sander,
Hey
>
> Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 8:10:34 PM, you wrote:
> > Yes, and in case of gentoo there are already people maintaining an
> > ebuild which pull in r4 on the wiki.
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Reiser4_With_Gentoo-So
Hello Sander,
Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 8:10:34 PM, you wrote:
> Yes, and in case of gentoo there are already people maintaining an
> ebuild which pull in r4 on the wiki.
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Reiser4_With_Gentoo-Sources
Debian has reiser4progs and kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4:
- stable: 20040
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 13:28 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> Monday, July 31, 2006, 11:46:34 PM, you wrote:
> > You must be new here...
> ;-)
>
> I wanted to point out that because:
> > Options B and C are all that ever seems to happen when reiserfs-list and
> > lkml collide.
>
Hello David,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 11:46:34 PM, you wrote:
> You must be new here...
;-)
I wanted to point out that because:
> Options B and C are all that ever seems to happen when reiserfs-list and
> lkml collide.
and:
> The speed of a nonworking program is irrelevant.
> The cost-effectiv
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello David,
- it is more expensive to:
a) succeed at kernel inclusion
b) argue
c) waste time
You must be new here...
Options B and C are all that ever seems to happen when reiserfs-list and
lkml collide.
Is option A possible? The speed of a nonworking prog
Hello David,
Monday, July 31, 2006, 1:30:47 AM, you wrote:
> Amen. I do not want to see Reiser4 not succeed because of politics, and
> it really looks like the only way to win the political war is not to
> play. The technical stuff is really the last way in, but neither side
> has said anything
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:08 -0500, David Masover wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
> > It might even be socially effective to shut down reiserfs-list until
> > inclusion occurs.
>
> Maybe. It will be an inconvenience for me, if we have to. I'm not even
> on LKML, and I'd rather not be -- even this li
Hans Reiser wrote:
I think that most of our problem is that we are too socially insulated
from lkml. They are a herd, and decide things based on what thoughts
echo most loudly.
To be fair, it's not the whole lkml you have to convince, just the few
people directly responsible for filesystems a
I think that most of our problem is that we are too socially insulated
from lkml. They are a herd, and decide things based on what thoughts
echo most loudly. That none of the shy developers working for me
actively post on lkml hurts us quite a bit.
It might even be socially effective to shut dow
Christian Trefzer wrote on 07/30/06 15:38:
> Hi,
>
> I booted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 today and later filled up my /opt partition by
> accident, and guess what, reiser4 did not screw up : D
Lucky you. I tried -rc2-mm1 today, and out of habit, the first thing I do is an
fsck on my reiser4 partitions. And
Christian Trefzer wrote:
Hi,
I booted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 today and later filled up my /opt partition by
accident, and guess what, reiser4 did not screw up : D
Hmm, I'm curious, though... How does it react to a few billion files?
Sorry, I can't test this, but I will be testing MythTV, if not now,
Hi,
I booted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 today and later filled up my /opt partition by
accident, and guess what, reiser4 did not screw up : D
I already planned on forcibly filling up something less depended upon,
like the portage tree, but studies kept me from playing and the
scheduled java vm update took ca
32 matches
Mail list logo
