Finally set up network logging: kernel -> syslog-ng -> TCP (crossover)
-> syslog-ng (other box) -> log file. This time, I actually caught
something from the crash. It may be hardware-related, but I thought I'd
report it here this time because the crash was definitely in Reiser4
code. This may o
2.6.17-rc3-mm1 plus the latest reiser4-radix-tree-direct-data-fix.patch patch.
-Joe
=
dmesg output:
=
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
003c
printing eip:
c01c8dca
*pde =
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT
last sysfs file: /class/n
Hello
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 06:39 -0700, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> On 4/18/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 00:35 -0700, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> > > Kernel: 2.6.16.3 with reiser4-for-2.6.16-2
> > > Compiler: GCC-4.1.0
> > >
> > > Notes: This c
On 4/18/06, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 00:35 -0700, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> > Kernel: 2.6.16.3 with reiser4-for-2.6.16-2
> > Compiler: GCC-4.1.0
> >
> > Notes: This caused the computer to not allow login, refuse to route
> > network stuff, thoug
Hello
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 00:35 -0700, Avuton Olrich wrote:
> Kernel: 2.6.16.3 with reiser4-for-2.6.16-2
> Compiler: GCC-4.1.0
>
> Notes: This caused the computer to not allow login, refuse to route
> network stuff, though I could see kernel messages still coming through
> (such as network traf
Kernel: 2.6.16.3 with reiser4-for-2.6.16-2
Compiler: GCC-4.1.0
Notes: This caused the computer to not allow login, refuse to route
network stuff, though I could see kernel messages still coming through
(such as network traffic trying to get through).
Any questions please ask. Thanks
Apr 15 22:58
Sergey Ivanov wrote on 03/28/06 13:52:
> Joe Feise wrote:
>> The machine is using ECC memory. Geez, I know what I need for a server...
>> From the Dell invoice:
>> 512MB DDR2, 400MHz,2X256MB ECC 1R DIMMs for PowerEdge SC420
>> Recreating the partition solved the problem. So to me it sure looks lik
Gregory Maxwell wrote on 03/28/06 13:22:
> On 3/28/06, Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> But for a production machine that is "producing" something of value, the
>> extra cost should not be an issue. RAM errors are so subtle and so hard
>> to find that ECC is of far more value than
Joe Feise wrote:
>
> The machine is using ECC memory. Geez, I know what I need for a server...
> From the Dell invoice:
> 512MB DDR2, 400MHz,2X256MB ECC 1R DIMMs for PowerEdge SC420
> Recreating the partition solved the problem. So to me it sure looks like
> fs corruption.
> I have sent the dmesg
On 3/28/06, Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But for a production machine that is "producing" something of value, the
> extra cost should not be an issue. RAM errors are so subtle and so hard
> to find that ECC is of far more value than RAID. It is obvious when
> your disk fails.
>
>
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 12:08 -0800, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Jonathan Briggs wrote:
[...]
> >And if it's a production machine, it is using ECC RAM, I would hope. If
> >it is, memory problems (unreported ones, anyway) are very, very
> >unlikely.
> >
> >
> Jonathan, be merciful, ECC ram last I checked
Joe Feise wrote:
> Jonathan Briggs writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
>>> But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition
>>> over night,
>>> without problems.
>>
Hans Reiser writes:
Jonathan Briggs wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
[...]
This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
without problems.
If this was a memory
Jonathan Briggs writes:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
[...]
This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
without problems.
If this was a memory problem, it would indeed
Jonathan Briggs wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
>[...]
>
>
>>This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
>>But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
>>without problems.
>>If this was a memory problem, it
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:34 -0800, Joachim Feise wrote:
[...]
> This is a production machine that I can't take offline for too long.
> But yes, I have compiled the kernel on another reiser4 partition over night,
> without problems.
> If this was a memory problem, it would indeed manifest itself in
On 28-Mar-06, at 10:34 AM, Joachim Feise wrote:
Toby Thain wrote on 03/27/06 22:34:
On 27-Mar-06, at 11:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't
really think
that the memory is bad. Th
Toby Thain wrote on 03/27/06 22:34:
> On 27-Mar-06, at 11:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
>>
>>> Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't
>>> really think
>>> that the memory is bad. The machine most likely would have
On 27-Mar-06, at 11:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't
really think
that the memory is bad. The machine most likely would have had
other issues
if that was the case.
You'd be *
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:14 PST, Joe Feise said:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't run a memtest, but I don't really think
> that the memory is bad. The machine most likely would have had other issues
> if that was the case.
You'd be *amazed*. Intermittently weak memory (especially if it
Joe Feise wrote on 03/27/06 13:41:
> Hi,
>
> I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
> I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
> /dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
> However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
> The installation of the sw pa
Toby Thain writes:
On 27-Mar-06, at 4:41 PM, Joe Feise wrote:
Hi,
I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
/dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
The installat
On 27-Mar-06, at 4:41 PM, Joe Feise wrote:
Hi,
I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
/dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
The installation of the sw package
Hi,
I had an interesting crash on my 2.6.16-mm1 machine earlier today.
I usually mount /usr/local readonly:
/dev/sda6 on /usr/local type reiser4 (ro)
However, since I wanted to update a sw package, I remounted it r/w.
The installation of the sw package failed with reiser4 errors. Sorry, I
don't
This is tac'd output, I'm not sure it's a reiser4 bug, but it ecasound
was writing to my TB partition. If it's already been fixed, please
point me to the patch :) Thanks.
Mar 22 12:47:49 shapeshifter Code: Bad EIP value.
Mar 22 12:47:49 shapeshifter [] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
Mar 22 12:47:49
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:47:51 +0200, it was written ...
>Anyway, I just prefer to try have things working but cut down on the
>fiddling, rather just report when something breaks :)
Vanilla 2.6.9 + 2.6.9-ck3 + latest 2.6.9 reiser4 (#2) patches, builds
and boots clean and easy,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:42:25AM +1100, Cal wrote:
> >I also edited as said above and kicked in a new compile...
>Yeah, me too.
Which I'm still waiting for ;)
>With the amount of work these guys are putting into it all, I wouldn't
>dare to suggest what's warranted. I'm content to fiddle about
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:28:26 +0200, it was written ...
>>Have a look at
>> 2.6.10-rc1-mm3/broken-out/reiser4-generic_acl-fix.patch.
>>Around line 16 of fs/reiser4/plugin/security/perm.c, return
>>vfs_permission(inode, mask); replaces
>> return generic_permission(ino
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:14:44AM +1100, Cal wrote:
> >fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9da81): In function `mask_ok_common':
> >: undefined reference to `vfs_permission'
> >make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
> >make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.9-cko4a'
> >make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
>Ha
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:21:19 +0200, it was written ...
...
>Anyway, my compile just failed:
>
>fs/built-in.o(.text+0x9da81): In function `mask_ok_common':
>: undefined reference to `vfs_permission'
>make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:00:59AM +1100, Cal wrote:
>
>Both of those patches appear to be from the mm series. They're in
>2.6.10-rc2-mm2 and 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 (at least), and have generous
>comments at their head regarding their purpose.
OK, I admit I didn't read through them :)
But they don't see
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:48:32 +0200, it was written ...
>I checked the patches, from Piotr's broken-out cko3 which he kindly
>gave me.
>
>#needed by reiser4
>make-tree_lock-an-rwlock.patch.bz2
>invalidate_inodes-speedup.patch.bz2
>
>What are those? Are they merged?
Bot
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 01:23:43PM +0200, Markus Törnqvist wrote:
>
>I don't remember if I mentioned it, but there were two patches
>from Piotr Neuman's -cko that were required by Reiser4 (according
>to him) but seemed to patch well onto vs's patched system...
>
>Can anyone give any info on this?
>
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:55:16 +0300, it was written ...
>> >ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
>
>There was an update today. Please make sure you got patch number 2.
>
The 2.6.9 patch #2 works just fine - thanks all!
cheers, Cal
riginal Message-
From: Vladimir Saveliev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 November 2004 16:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Markus Törnqvist; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reiser4 crash
Hello
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 15:35, Cal wrote:
> --
> and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:05:45 +0
Hello
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 15:35, Cal wrote:
> --
> and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:05:45 +0200, it was written ...
> >ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
There was an update today. Please make sure you got patch number 2.
> >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=110
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:05:45 +0200, it was written ...
>ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=110121057720746&w=2
>
>It is possible the posted patch is included in the second patch
>at namesys.
>
>I'd still like to kn
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:42:12PM +1100, Cal wrote:
>
>While I search for the link to said patches, can you point me to
>them?
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.9/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=110121057720746&w=2
It is possible the posted patch is included in the second
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:23:43 +0200, it was written ...
>Did you try vs's patches?
While I search for the link to said patches, can you point me to
them?
cheers, Cal
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:19:19PM +1100, Cal wrote:
>This occurs with 2.6.10-rc2-mm2, 2.6.10-rc2-mm3. It's nastier than
>you might think. After the BUG, the system slowly sinks into fatal
>decline, losing screen i/o, keyboard response, eventually just
>locking up completely.
Did you try vs's p
--
and then at Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:54:10 +0300, it was written ...
>
>Which kernel do you use?
>
>> Sami
...
>> kernel BUG at fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:32!
>> invalid operand: [#1]
>> PREEMPT
...
>> EFLAGS: 00210286 (2.6.10-rc1)
>> EIP is at get_exclusive
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:54:10AM +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:47, Sami Liedes wrote:
> > Attached are the oops and fsck.reiser4 output.
> >
> > This happened after using reiser4 for only 1,5 days.
> >
>
> Which kernel do you use?
2.6.10-rc1.
Sami
Hello
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:47, Sami Liedes wrote:
> Attached are the oops and fsck.reiser4 output.
>
> This happened after using reiser4 for only 1,5 days.
>
Which kernel do you use?
> Sami
>
>
> --- oops ---
> kernel BUG at fs/reiser
Attached are the oops and fsck.reiser4 output.
This happened after using reiser4 for only 1,5 days.
Sami
--- oops ---
kernel BUG at fs/reiser4/plugin/file/tail_conversion.c:32!
invalid operand: [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked in: ide_cd c
Hi,
I had reiser4 crash pretty badly. Here's the story.
My distribution is Gentoo. As you probably know it uses as packaging system a
tool called "emerge" which basically installs applications following
installation scripts called "ebuilds". Usually packages are compil
45 matches
Mail list logo
