Łukasz Mierzwa wrote:
Dnia Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:51:39 +0200, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
David Masover schrieb:
(...)
If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this
list
You will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.
Dnia Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:51:39 +0200, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
David Masover schrieb:
(...)
If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list
You will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com,
it's just tha
David Masover schrieb:
(...)
And it's not really true that spamassassin is a manual-rule-based
filter only.
Right, but the statistical/learning component of spamassassin is just
that -- a component, to be combined with razor/pyzor, manual rules, and
anything else they can think of. I thin
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
David Masover schrieb:
(...)
If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list
You will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com,
it's just that it is not configured good enough.
Can spamassassin be configured "good" enoug
David Masover schrieb:
(...)
If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list
You will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com,
it's just that it is not configured good enough.
Can spamassassin be configured "good" enough?
I use dspam:
http://www
Łukasz Mierzwa wrote:
> Dnia Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:40:22 +0200, Gregory Maxwell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>
>> On 9/16/05, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> yeah, but it is to be used by the end-user.
>>>
>>> the archive will be still filled with spam.
>>>
>>> not everyone wh
Dnia Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:52:17 +0200, Ingo Bormuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
On 2005-09-16 14:46, Łukasz Mierzwa wrote:
If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list You
will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com, it's
just that it is not con
On 2005-09-16 14:46, Łukasz Mierzwa wrote:
>
> If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list You
> will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com, it's
> just that it is not configured good enough.
>
You're right. I use spamassassin in standard conf
Here's my suggestion. I don't know if Hans et al has the time for
it, but the simple solution would be to set the list up as moderated
and subscriber-only posting. So when a list subscriber posts, it
goes through immediately. If a non-subscriber posts (e.g. someone
from a different account, a cr
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Grzegorz Kulewski schrieb:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Ingo Bormuth schrieb:
>
> > On 2005-09-16 12:18, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> >
> > > When I look at the archives, the first impression is that 90% of
> > posts on
Dnia Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:40:22 +0200, Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
On 9/16/05, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yeah, but it is to be used by the end-user.
the archive will be still filled with spam.
not everyone who wants to know about reiser subscribes to the l
On 9/16/05, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah, but it is to be used by the end-user.
>
> the archive will be still filled with spam.
>
> not everyone who wants to know about reiser subscribes to the list; most
> of the people would just use the archives.
I actually subbed to t
Grzegorz Kulewski schrieb:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Ingo Bormuth schrieb:
On 2005-09-16 12:18, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> When I look at the archives, the first impression is that 90% of
posts on > the list are spam messages...
> Can't you do something about that?
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Ingo Bormuth schrieb:
On 2005-09-16 12:18, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> When I look at the archives, the first impression is that 90% of posts on
> the list are spam messages...
> Can't you do something about that?
Locally I pipe all mail thr
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
The real reason is that it allows posts from non-registered users...
This should really be fixed.
Spam in the archive looks lame :)
Most lists I use allow me to post without subscribing (I use gmane
mail->news gateway), but this list has the most spam of them all.
Ingo Bormuth schrieb:
On 2005-09-16 12:18, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
When I look at the archives, the first impression is that 90% of posts
on the list are spam messages...
Can't you do something about that?
Locally I pipe all mail through spamassassin and hardly see any spam.
I think that
On 2005-09-16 12:18, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> When I look at the archives, the first impression is that 90% of posts
> on the list are spam messages...
> Can't you do something about that?
Locally I pipe all mail through spamassassin and hardly see any spam.
I think that should also be applica
Why does reiserfs list get so much spam?
When I look at the archives, the first impression is that 90% of posts
on the list are spam messages...
Can't you do something about that?
Lists of other Open Source projects get spam only occasionally.
--
Tomek
http://wpkg.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
