On Feb 8, 2008 4:54 PM, Sebastien Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a theoretical question about Model-Free analysis concerning the
> minimum amount of data required...
>
> In ModelFree, it is possible to obtain fitted parameters for residues
> for which only one R1 and one R2 datas
Hi,
The internal representation in relax is {tm, Da, theta, phi}, so this
is how it is output in the results file. All the different types of
parameter which are input are converted to this internal
representations. If you need, there are user functions which will
convert between the formats, pr
Hi,
In relax, the Rex reported will be that of the first input field
strength. The frequency of the Rex value is documented in the header
line of the results file. This is a deliberate design to increase the
flexibility of relax - Rex is automatically handled for you. If you
would like to conve
Hi again,
Thanks for that also !
Cheers,
Séb
Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 4:54 PM, Sebastien Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a theoretical question about Model-Free analysis concerning the
minimum amount of data required...
In ModelFree, it is possible to obta
Hi Ed,
Thanks for this info !
Cheers,
Séb
Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
Hi,
The internal representation in relax is {tm, Da, theta, phi}, so this
is how it is output in the results file. All the different types of
parameter which are input are converted to this internal
representations. If y
Hi Ed,
Ok, that's what I thought after some reflexion...
I wanted to ask since I was aware that this could cause chi2 values or
model selection to vary, etc...
Thus, relax's behaviour is the same as in ModelFree for what concerns
which Rex is reported.
Thanks Ed !
Séb :)
Edward d'Auv
6 matches
Mail list logo