Re: R1 and R2 for MF analysis

On Feb 8, 2008 4:54 PM, Sebastien Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a theoretical question about Model-Free analysis concerning the > minimum amount of data required... > > In ModelFree, it is possible to obtain fitted parameters for residues > for which only one R1 and one R2 datas

Re: Spheroid diffusion tensor

Hi, The internal representation in relax is {tm, Da, theta, phi}, so this is how it is output in the results file. All the different types of parameter which are input are converted to this internal representations. If you need, there are user functions which will convert between the formats, pr

Re: Rex vs magnetic field

Hi, In relax, the Rex reported will be that of the first input field strength. The frequency of the Rex value is documented in the header line of the results file. This is a deliberate design to increase the flexibility of relax - Rex is automatically handled for you. If you would like to conve

Re: R1 and R2 for MF analysis

Hi again, Thanks for that also ! Cheers, Séb Edward d'Auvergne wrote: On Feb 8, 2008 4:54 PM, Sebastien Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have a theoretical question about Model-Free analysis concerning the minimum amount of data required... In ModelFree, it is possible to obta

Re: Spheroid diffusion tensor

Hi Ed, Thanks for this info ! Cheers, Séb Edward d'Auvergne wrote: Hi, The internal representation in relax is {tm, Da, theta, phi}, so this is how it is output in the results file. All the different types of parameter which are input are converted to this internal representations. If y

Re: Rex vs magnetic field

Hi Ed, Ok, that's what I thought after some reflexion... I wanted to ask since I was aware that this could cause chi2 values or model selection to vary, etc... Thus, relax's behaviour is the same as in ModelFree for what concerns which Rex is reported. Thanks Ed ! Séb :) Edward d'Auv