Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-24 Thread Edward d'Auvergne
Yeah, it's the relaxation of the 15N so the spin name should be 'N'. It might give strange results having vectors of zero length ;) Edward On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Tyler Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe I need to use 'N' for the spin_name column because the extracted vector is

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-24 Thread Sébastien Morin
Hi Tyler, If you want all output from relax to go to a log file, use the option '-l'... (relax -l script.py) If you want all output from relax to go to a file AND the terminal (display), use the option '-t'... (relax -t script.py) These options are visible when typing : ./relax --help (or

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-24 Thread Sébastien Morin
Oh... Sorry... It's still early in the morning here (Quebec City)... ... Dont' forget to specify a log file... LOG - relax -l LOG script.py TEE - relax -t LOG script.py If you just specify the script, the script will be erased by the log... Cheers, Séb Sébastien Morin wrote: Hi

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-24 Thread Edward d'Auvergne
:S It overwrites a pre-existing file! And the important script of all things!!! That'll have to be fixed. Seb, could you submit a bug report for that? Cheers, Edward On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Sébastien Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh... Sorry... It's still early in the morning

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-24 Thread Tyler Reddy
Thanks Seb. It looks like my 'prolate' iterations in the 2nd round are maxing out and this is causing an error output (even though the first round seemed okay): k: 311 xk: array([ 2.60992216e-11, 5.0957e+02]) fk: 2254.7254621187344 Entering sub-algorithm.

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-24 Thread Edward d'Auvergne
Hi, This is a strange bug if it only occurred in the second round. I can't see what the problem is right now so I will have to think about this one for a bit. In the mean time, would you be able to create a bug report for this issue? Additional information may be required to solve this one.

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-23 Thread Tyler Reddy
The aic results file should be attached to the bug report. It looks like it's there when I check it. Quoting Edward d'Auvergne [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I've tried the PDB file and it seems to be fine. There are no strange formatting issues there. Therefore it is caused by the loaded

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-23 Thread Edward d'Auvergne
Right, got it and can reproduce the bug. I think I know what the issue is, but would you be able to attach the full_analysis.py script to the bug report so I can confirm it? Well, actually there are probably two issues, the first being a problem with the full analysis script not setting the spin

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-23 Thread Tyler Reddy
Ok, I updated to the latest build and made the adjustment. Presumably since the heteronucleus is set to 'N', 'H' is enough info for that column in the sequence file? It's working now for 'prolate' in any case. I see that you can change the bug report display to show 'closed' reports, sorry

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-23 Thread Tyler Reddy
Maybe I need to use 'N' for the spin_name column because the extracted vector is H-H, which is very weird. It took 10 rounds for the 'prolate' script to converge: RelaxWarning: The XH bond vector for residue ':[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is of zero length. Extracted H-H vectors for ':[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-22 Thread Tyler Reddy
Okay, I submitted the report. Let me know if there's more information you need or a better way to submit bug reports in general.. haven't done this before. Also, I had to manually copy/paste the output, and while it looks fine, if there is a problem with the same pdb structure getting read twice

Re: Model-Free Results Output

2008-10-21 Thread Sébastien Morin
Hi Tyler, Do you get the same error when trying the 'oblate' or 'ellipsoid' diffusion tensors ? Sébastien Tyler Reddy wrote: I'm having an issue with the full_analysis.py script. It seems to work fine when DIFF_MODEL = 'local_tm' or 'sphere' (converges on 4th round) but for 'prolate' I