The branch 'gnome-3-36' was created pointing to:
dbe95f6... Release 2.36.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-34' was created pointing to:
57af195... Release ATK 2.33.3
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-32' was created.
Summary of new commits:
5d846e0... atkimplementor: use the G_DEFINE_INTERFACE macro to declare
e75b08b... atkcomponent: Fix some g-i annotation warnings
e1dd2f1... build: Bump up dependency on Meson
7d0b258... build: Use Meson to test for compiler and
options on Darwin
* Bug 795301: meson: follow meson_options convention
Contributors:
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro, Alejandro Piñeiro, Samuel Thibault
Translations:
gogo (hr), Cheng-Chia Tseng (zh_TW), Daniel Șerbănescu (ro)
Download
https://download.gnome.org/sources/atk/2.29/atk
News
* meson: fix version numbering. Roll new release to include it.
Download
https://download.gnome.org/sources/atk/2.28/atk-2.28.1.tar.xz (696K)
sha256sum: cd3a1ea6ecc268a2497f0cd018e970860de24a6d42086919d6bf6c8e8d53f4fc
___
release
News
Changes in version 2.28
===
* documentation
* Bug 791020: Remove list association from ATK_ROLE_DESCRIPTION_{TERM,VALUE}
Translations
Claude Paroz (fr), GNOME Translation Robot (gd)
Download
https://download.gnome.org/sources/atk/2.28/atk-2.28.0.tar.
The branch 'gnome-3-28' was created pointing to:
083f4a0... Release 2.28
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-26' was created pointing to:
d2fbf66... Release 2.26.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-24' was created pointing to:
7d1f9a6... Release 2.24.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-22' was created pointing to:
8934f2d... Release 2.22.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-20' was created pointing to:
5a0a857... Release 2.20.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-18' was created pointing to:
eacc351... Release 2.18.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
The branch 'gnome-3-16' was created pointing to:
3f9e43b... Release 3.16.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
lease-team/2014-June/msg6.html
[2] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2015-February/msg8.html
[3]
http://gnome.soup.io/post/124794028/Frederic-Peters-Rejuvenating-your-release-team
--
Alejandro Piñeiro (apinhe...@igalia.com)
___
re
On 18/01/15 02:33, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Hi.
> "We need to talk."
>
> I'll be at FOSDEM. Who else?
Sorry, this year Im not going to FOSDEM.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro (apinhe...@igalia.com)
___
release-team@gnome.org
htt
ussed.
Just jumped in on the disccusion about 3.16 Target Bugs.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro (apinhe...@igalia.com)
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ve
accessibility features/bugfixes we would want to have for 3.16. I think
that it would be good to sync with Allan idea, instead of going on our own.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro (apinhe...@igalia.com)
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mail
The branch 'gnome-3-14' was created pointing to:
fe7573f... Release 2.14.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
attached to the bug report.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735994
> Fine, 1 of 2.
2/2
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
gt;
>> Patch is attached to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736922
> Fine, approval 1 of 2.
2 of 2.
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
to give a release-team vote
on an own bug.
Best regards
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
i?id=736214
>>>
>> 1/2 from i18n.
> 2/2.
>
1/2 from release-team
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ke to apply that patch.
> i18n 2/2
>
1/2 from release-team
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ems broken and causes
crashes
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734805
We talked about this bug on today accessibility meeting. Joanmarie
triagged it and confirmed that is a real bug. Mike Gorse voluntereed to
take a look to the bug.
BR
--
----
Ale
e best spot to do it.
>
> Let's discuss things over lunch tomorrow?
Works for me.
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
r for a few weeks before.
>
> My idea would be to send a short email to desktop-devel-list, and
> individually we could follow up to whoever we feel should really
> apply.
AFAIK, in the end this mail was not sent. It is still planned to send a
email to annou
The branch 'gnome-3-12' was created pointing to:
94766ee... Release 2.12.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
ut I would not object
too much if any other from the release team votes for 3.12.0
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
elp-check.in#n441
>>
>> Can I put this in for 3.12.0?
> This doesn't strike me as a blocker issue - I'd say we should hold
> this until after .0 at this point.
I agree.
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Just realized that I didn't include Juan Pablo on my answer. Answering
again including him, so he could answer.
Sorry for the noise
On 03/18/2014 06:36 PM, Piñeiro wrote:
> On 03/18/2014 03:09 AM, Juan Pablo Ugarte wrote:
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I would like to add a dial
anyone else from the design team).
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
nal id and 1 move of initialization of the state of getting of
>> printer details (see the comment #7).
>>
>> The patch has been already accepted.
> Let me accept it again with a different hat on: +1 for the release team.
And second +1 from release team here.
--
Alejan
Hi, any feedback on this string freeze break request?
Best regards
On 03/06/2014 01:45 PM, Piñeiro wrote:
> As part of this bug [1] some strings were added to ATK, in order to
> provide description strings to values and ranges (e.g. "weak" for
> passwords, "very low&
the-meter-element
[3]
https://git.gnome.org/browse/atk/commit/?id=91a1de461fa60fea8212ad0509efb7ab45ee38a6
--
----
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
uld be better if all the
people that already know they personal agenda to decide a day, and I
would try to join the chosen day.
Again, apologies for the inconvenience.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/m
rfaces in place. Expecting us to write all
> of those as a prerequisite for being 'allowed' into Debian is a
> non-starter.
I fully agree with this paragraph. Thanks for the summary.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@g
update the wiki page.
Thanks, and best regards
[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland#Proposed_roadmap
[2] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2014-January/msg00009.html
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://m
ut we need to decide now. (btw that would be nice for people attending
> FOSDEM this weekend)
As I said on IRC (sorry for not saying anything at the list) I'm ok with
moving one week all the following releases.
PS: this year I will not attend FOSDEM. Have f
also present on 3.10.0
and 3.10.1, so as the last 3.10 official stable release of GNOME, I
thought that was better to delay a little the release but having the
regression fixed. And was fixed.
Best regards
On 11/18/2013 06:26 PM, Piñeiro wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here comes GNOME 3.10.2, t
http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/3.10.2/
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
chedule, please see:
>http://live.gnome.org/Schedule
>
> Thanks,
> ___
> release-team@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
> Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
>
--
Alejandro Piñeiro
___
Hello everybody, I know that this is an old thread, but unfortunately,
it doesn't have a proper answer, and people still ping me about it now
and then. Probably everybody is being pinged. Now that 3.10 is out the
door, perhaps it's a good time to revisit it.
On 08/06/2013 02:22 P
on IRC) but in
any case:
2/2 for release team.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Sa 5 | Su 6 | Mo 7 | Tu 8 | We 9 | Th 10 | Fr 11
>> fredp ok ok no ok no ok ok
> jjardonok oknooknookok
apinheirono nookok okokno
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
The branch 'gnome-3-10' was created pointing to:
25fcaf6... Release 2.10.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
; Little change and reviewed by already 2 developers:
>
> 1/2 for release team
I agree. 2/2 now
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Hi everybody,
On the wiki you can find a update of the status of the feature at June
18 [5].
Finally, a patch [1] for this feature has been approved by Jasper [2],
gnome-shell reviewer. It was also tested by Alejandro Piñeiro [3] and
reviewed by Joseph Scheuhammer [4], from the accessibility
On 08/29/2013 09:40 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 29 August 2013 16:59, Piñeiro wrote:
>> This bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707010
>>
>> Prevents to use any atspi event listener on gnome-shell, and in
>> extension, in any gjs with a
ethod when creating the .gir file.
Note that Mike Gorse (at-spi2-core maintainer) notes that that method
was added as just an utility method, and that probably it will be
deprecated from the C API as well.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team
ts" on my original mail.
Let's say that what people want is that commit police thing, and that we
agree on that new power. Someone could wonder, why the release team has
that power? Because after all, nobody elected us. In the end we can end
on a situa
uot;. In my head, a example of this would be what happened with
Nautilus.
So this was the objective message. About my personal opinion, I have
some doubts, so I will wait a little before giving an opinion.
Thanks for listening
Best regards
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
real this time; Sunday 14th.
> Well I was around yesterday, but nobody else it seems...
>
> Do we have an agenda?
>
> andre
Sorry, for me Sunday (and in general weeked) at that hour doesn't work
really well (thats the reason I was not around yesterday). T
the tinting that means that is postponed for the moment.
In the case of the focus tracking, is now a GSoC project [1]. Joseph and
other people of the accessibility team figure as Magdalen Berns mentor.
BR
[1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2013/magpie/14001
--
Alejan
The branch 'gnome-3-8' was created pointing to:
8d49ba6... Release 2.8.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
On 03/15/2013 09:41 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:30:38PM +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
>> [2] https://live.gnome.org/Wayland/Gaps#Accessibility
> Then we need to get that done (preferably in a freedesktop.org way).
> There currently is 30.000 USD for accessibility,
ing to be "really concerned" about).
FWIW, I have just added some comments on the accessibility section of
Wayland Gaps [2].
BR
[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649556
[2] https://live.gnome.org/Wayland/Gaps#Accessibility
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
__
verview of the GNOME schedule, please see:
http://live.gnome.org/Schedule
[1] https://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/Freezes
[1] https://live.gnome.org/Smoketesting
---
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
GNOME Release Team
___
release-team@gnome
On 03/03/2013 01:00 AM, Release Team wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> GNOME 3.7.91 beta release
Nobody answered my mail volunteering myself to do this release. Was
previously assigned (and I missed it) or should I assume that I'm the
current assignee of this release?
BR
--
Alejandro Pi
html
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
t
was not so a big typo :P
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Piñeiro <mailto:apinhe...@igalia.com>> wrote:
>
> On 02/19/2013 06:09 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Just a followup on this - if anyone else can help out, that'd be
> much
> >
f it is not
assigned yet.
BR
[1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2012-November/msg00015.html
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
is a GNOME booth; let's meet there on Saturday, say at 2pm,
> we'll then have to find a quiet place.
>
Was this meeting canceled? I dont see anybody at the booth ...
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https:
rence before noon.
Although I still didn't buy my tickets, my current plan is being there
at FOSDEM. I'm ok with having that meeting.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
orking on last Ubuntu LTS?
BR
[1] https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/Python3Porting
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
joanie: hey. any reason orca has a dependency on python 3.3?
yeah, there were some changes (or bug fixes) in Python 3.3
is it possible to get along with 3.2?
ubuntu precise do
The branch 'gnome-3-6' was created.
Summary of new commits:
4693afe... portability: use "=" operator instead of "==" in shell scri
d923041... daemon: use GDBus directly instead of dbus-python
0dc689b... Fix border-image slice values in antler's gtk CSS
ab55639... Release 0.4.4.2
_
, feature review, etc.
>>> Shall we continue the meeting next weekend, same time ? Or what is the
>>> next possible time for everybody ?
> Id would prefer Sunday if possible
And in my case I would prefer Saturday :| (except Satu
nged some people at the rt IRC channel,
but other possible topic is about how "real" this goal would be:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/Python3Porting
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
no ok no ok no
> Andre | ? ✔ ✔ ✔ ? -
> Colin |
> Frederic |
> Javier|
> Kjartan |
> Luca |
> Matthias |
> Olav |
In a summary, any given Saturday.
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
On 09/30/2012 04:59 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> it occurred to me that I should ask: are any release team members in
> Boston next weekend, aside from Colin and me ?
>
If nothing strange happens, I will be at Boston as well.
BR
--
Alejandro P
The branch 'gnome-3-6' was created pointing to:
3ae4d68... Release 2.6.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Don't know if Emmanuele talked with some of the release team on IRC, but
for me it was somewhat a surprise find that the only point on the
Foundation agenda was this:
Role and scope of the Release Team
* Continuation of the discussion from the AGM at GUADEC 2012.
*
http://www.0d.be/2012/
cs (so Shaun) agrees.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
releases to catch this kind of thing,"
The full thread:
http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/2012-August/001217.html
The specific answer I C&P from:
http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/2012-August/001219.html
Best regards
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
__
asons of having old versions
of automake on the bootstrap list.
> Do we have any
> guidance on that beyond 'use gnome-autogen' ?
>
No idea.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/lis
, some other was just
a busy dayjob week.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
GNOME 3.5.4 beta is available.
See 3.5 schedule to check what that means:
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive
GNOME 3.5.4
To compile GNOME 3.5.4 use jhbuild [1] and the moduleset files used
at this release [2]:
[1] http://developer.gnome.org/jhbuild/3.4/jhbuild.html
[2
|OK OK
> Kjartan|
> Luca|
> Matthias |
> Olav|
>
> Potential topics (feel free to add/edit/comment):
> * Features progress
> * GnomeGoals progress
> * nautilus recent discussions
>
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesia
Andre | ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
> Colin |
> Frederic |
> Javier|
> Kjartan |
> Luca |
> Matthias |
> Olav |
>
In summary, on any given Saturday.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@
The branch 'gnome-3-4' was created pointing to:
1b8bdb2... Release 2.4.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
x x
>>>> 10× × x x
>>>> 11× × x
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
.org/ThreePointThree
[2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670638
[3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669787
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
GNOME 3.3.90 beta is available.
This release marks The Freeze. See 3.3 schedule to check what that
means:
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree
GNOME 3.3.90 beta
To compile GNOME 3.3.90 use jhbuild [1] and the moduleset files used
at this release [2]:
[1] http://developer
_____
>
Idem: full week availability if the meeting starts at 16:00 UTC
Full time availability on 12 and 15
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
On 11/18/2011 09:16 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 19:32 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
>> core - http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/core/3.2/3.2.2/sources/
> I noticed that you ship mm-common, but that should not be required by
> any tarball builds.
FWIW, mm-common was a
ipt, so not sure how to improve it
BR
[1]
https://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/MakingARelease#Final_steps_.28on_any_machine.29
[2]
http://git.gnome.org/browse/releng/commit/?id=92fe1a7a4e8f184fde1bf2edc10cde13d83c21d6
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
/Schedule
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
23 Sat 29 Sun 30 Sat 5 Sun 6
>> Fred ××××× ×
>>
>> Andre --××× ×
> Javier-xxx --
API - - x
ls had
some investigation behind, like estimation of the work required to
migrate Dots to new python bindings, Dasher behaviour on GNOME 3.X etc.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-tea
The branch 'gnome-3-2' was created pointing to:
36c2946... Release 2.2.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
.html
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
On 08/26/2011 09:46 AM, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2011/8/25 Colin Walters:
31/8 1/9
Fred ××
andre ××
Javier x-
walters x x
Luca x x
Piñeiro x x
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
already step up for 3.1.90
before the meeting) and clean our feature list to reflect what we
achieved (this will help in writing the release notes); other things
you'd want on the agenda?
In my case it would be impossible to be there this weekend. Sorry.
BR
--
A
some initial
state, but not success getting this working, and that proposal was
forgotten.
How do you see that? Someone thinks that would be a good idea to try
this again?
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gn
some important projects at
dayjob, and voila, no meeting in a while, and noone assigned to this
3.1.5 release.
This weekend is certainly too short of a notice, but what about a
meeting next one, Sat 20 or Sun 21?
Ok. I prefer Sat 20.
(I'll handle 3.1.5.)
Thanks.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeir
=2c31c7bd3db1d3156c0c7ea18832b03a2920c591
[2] http://live.gnome.org/Grilo
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias (API) (apinhe...@igalia.com)
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in
e fixing it.
Finally I want to thanks the help provided by other release team
member in my first release, like Matthias Clasen, Javier Jardón,
Frederic Peters and specially Kjartan who probably made more work than
me on this release.
PS: I have sent the announcement to gnome-announce-list a
On 06/05/2011 02:56 AM, Piñeiro wrote:
Hi,
this Thursday, as usual, we had our weekly #a11y meeting. In this
meeting we debated the thread started on release-team, specifically
Matthias Clasen mail, the issues and perceptions (as we think that
some of them are just communication problems
, instead of the usual one hour meeting we had a exhausting three
hours meetings.
In summary, FYI:
https://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/Minutes/20110602#Recent_Mailing_List_Discussions
Hope to be interesting.
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias (API) (apinhe...@igalia.com
frustration. In general, "frustration" applies to
most of the aspect of current GNOME accessibility.
I don't see many hopeful signs for a11y improving in 3.2 or 3.4.
WIP
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias (API) (apinhe...@igalia.com)
___
release-team@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
