On Monday, June 04, 2012 01:26:01 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Monday 04 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > It's not about hurting or not (that it does, see how Martin got confused
> > and probably lost time wondering how something like that could be
> > happening).
>
> Oh, and what Martin actua
On Sunday, June 03, 2012 20:46:56 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I don't want to blame anyone (that's why I did not name the distros).
Well, it's a specific distro pushing out packages too early to its users (and
in this case, a group that doesn't understand that these are not 4.8.80
packages until we
To get some more info for this discussion I asked about Gnome
They put tars on their public ftp server on the Monday and release on the
Wednesday
09:49 < Riddell> didrocks: doesn't that lead to lots of comments on news sites
and user forums "gnome 3.2 is released, why don't I have packages yet
On Sunday, June 3, 2012 11:47:02 Harry Miller wrote:
> > The number of developers who need to be hit by a bus for the
> > project to be
> > destroyed. 1 means there's a single point of failure (you),
> > i.e., whenever you
> > aren't available for whatever reason (such as the past few
> > days), ev
On Monday, June 4, 2012 00:52:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Bad:
> * We lose some of the storm since we are "late" to our own release :D
we've also had situations in the past where tarballs have been made, a
critical problem uncovered, fixes made, a re-roll happens ... and hopefully no
users ha
On Monday, June 4, 2012 11:18:08 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> do with blame or responsibility, but rather ensuring that there are enough
e.. i meant to write "blame or scapegoating" :)
--
Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
On Monday 04 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> That means that people report bugs against different incarnations of the
> same packages, which makes bugs hard to find -- it doesn't work as we
> can't verify the exact state of the code a bug is filed against.
That almost never makes a difference
On Monday 04 June 2012 10:52:13 you wrote:
> On Sunday, June 03, 2012 20:46:56 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I don't want to blame anyone (that's why I did not name the distros).
>
> Well, it's a specific distro pushing out packages too early to its users
> (and in this case, a group that doesn't under
On Monday 04 June 2012 15:18:11 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Monday 04 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > That means that people report bugs against different incarnations of the
> > same packages, which makes bugs hard to find -- it doesn't work as we
> > can't verify the exact state of the code a
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2012, 18:01:29 schrieb Martin Gräßlin:
> On Monday 04 June 2012 15:18:11 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > On Monday 04 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > That means that people report bugs against different incarnations of the
> > > same packages, which makes bugs hard to find -- it
On Monday 04 June 2012 18:34:40 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> This issue is even a bigger problem if your fellow developers compile your
> code from scratch and then file a bug by version "Compiled from sources".
> Should happen much more often, no? :)
quite the opposite. Most users who actuall
Good job everyone!
If you want to be added to http://kde.org/info/4.8.80.php#binary send the
releast team list patches for
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/www/sites/www/info/binary-4.8.80.inc?view=log
Cheers,
Albert
___
release-team mailing list
release
On Monday 04 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> In contrast to the privilege of early access to unreleased tarballs we ask
> the packagers to follow this rules:
> * Do not make the packages available to your users (even in development
> branches) before the official tarballs are announced
Thi
On Sunday 03 Jun 2012 22:28:31 Michael Pyne wrote:
> I like to view it as we have specific points-of-contact within the various
> distributions who have agreed to interact directly with us, the KDE
> developers and community in order to deliver the best possible KDE for
> their distribution. As s
On Saturday 02 June 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> I think I fixed fstab support for solid, the patch is pending review:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105132/
>
> Being 4.8.4 the last stable release (at least according to the release
> schedule) it will be very sad if we release it without thi
El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 22:33:55, Will Stephenson va escriure:
> Most distros are offering packaged git snapshots perfectly legitimately
> anyway. I think these rules are an overreaction to Martin's complaint
> about the beta1 announce and undo, and would write that off as an
> acci
On Monday 28 May 2012, Allen Winter wrote:
> Is anyone strongly in favor of KDE SC 4.8.5?
Hi,
not necessarily in favor, but in case there are urgent issues we might be
reconsidering it.
IMHO we should revisit the topic in 2 months and then decide if it is worth
it.
With other words, we ke
On Monday, June 04, 2012 22:36:16 Dirk Müller wrote:
> On Monday 28 May 2012, Allen Winter wrote:
> > Is anyone strongly in favor of KDE SC 4.8.5?
>
> Hi,
>
> not necessarily in favor, but in case there are urgent issues we might be
> reconsidering it.
>
> IMHO we should revisit the topic in
On Monday, June 04, 2012 00:11:32 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Sorry for breaking threading. I wasn't subscribed when this was sent, so I
> had to copy/paste from the web archive.
> > > So it turns I'm undecided and don't know if we should un-tighthen the
> > > first
> > > point to something like
> >
On Monday 04 June 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> Not including this patch will mean not having fstab support until 4.9
> (since we won't have 4.8.5).
Why aren't we doing .5 releases anymore? Those .5 releases have always been
welcome when they were done (which went back and forth). I also don't see
El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 01:26:01, Kevin Kofler va escriure:
> On Monday 04 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > It's not about hurting or not (that it does, see how Martin got confused
> > and probably lost time wondering how something like that could be
> > happening).
>
> Oh, an
El Diumenge, 3 de juny de 2012, a les 23:54:30, Scott Kitterman va escriure:
> On Monday, June 04, 2012 01:20:33 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 00:51:30, Kevin Kofler va escriure:
> > > On Monday 04 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > I know building pa
El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 00:11:32, Scott Kitterman va escriure:
> Sorry for breaking threading. I wasn't subscribed when this was sent, so I
> had to copy/paste from the web archive.
>
> > On Monday, June 04, 2012 00:52:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > My proposal:
> > >
> > > *
El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 06:31:56, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
> On Monday 04 June 2012 01:26:01 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > On Monday 04 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > It's not about hurting or not (that it does, see how Martin got confused
> > > and probably lost time wonderin
El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 22:33:55, Will Stephenson va escriure:
> On Sunday 03 Jun 2012 22:28:31 Michael Pyne wrote:
> > I like to view it as we have specific points-of-contact within the various
> > distributions who have agreed to interact directly with us, the KDE
> > developers and
El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 23:17:25, Philip Muskovac va escriure:
> Hi,
Hi
> we just got pointed to the fact that in the 4.8.3 release the french kstars
> documentation was removed [1]. That was done in svn rev 1292134 as it
> doesn't seem to build anymore.
> While we appreciate that y
On Monday, June 04, 2012 05:34:03 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Monday, June 04, 2012 00:11:32 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Sorry for breaking threading. I wasn't subscribed when this was sent, so
> > I had to copy/paste from the web archive.
> >
> > > > So it turns I'm undecided and don't know if we
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 12:56:36 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 4 de juny de 2012, a les 00:11:32, Scott Kitterman va escriure:
> > Sorry for breaking threading. I wasn't subscribed when this was sent, so
> > I
> > had to copy/paste from the web archive.
> >
> > > On Monday, June 04,
28 matches
Mail list logo
