Re: PIM: Version alignment

Le vendredi 16 septembre 2016, 20:55:16 CEST David Jarvie a écrit : > On 16 September 2016 11:55:50 BST, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications > > > >release, > > > >> doesn't alig

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:55 AM, David Jarvie wrote: > > > On 16 September 2016 11:55:50 BST, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: >>> >>> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, >>> doesn't align it's interna

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Saturday, 17 September 2016 00:01:59 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Luigi Toscano >> >> wrote: >> > On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Lui

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On 16 September 2016 11:55:50 BST, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications >release, >> doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the >> Applications release. >> >>

Re: PIM: Version alignment

> The problem here is to have an easy way to update the version data on > bugzilla. I think that this can be automated. Not trivial that due to bugzilla not having an API and the bugzilla Product names being unrelated to any git repository. The script I use for Plasma uses CURL and a local save

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Saturday, 17 September 2016 00:01:59 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Luigi Toscano > > wrote: > > On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano > >> > >> wrote: > >> > On Friday, 16 September 2

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano >> >> wrote: >> > On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> It seems that KDE P

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Friday, 16 September 2016 23:04:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano > > wrote: > > On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, > >> doesn'

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, >> doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the >> Applications releas

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Friday, 16 September 2016 22:52:32 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, > doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the > Applications release. > > This causes issues - as we've received complaints abou

Re: PIM: Version alignment

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:52:32PM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote: > It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, > doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the > Applications release. > > This causes issues - as we've received complaints about various > pr

PIM: Version alignment

Hi all, It seems that KDE PIM, despite being part of the Applications release, doesn't align it's internal version numbers with the rest of the Applications release. This causes issues - as we've received complaints about various products (all being PIM products) missing versions on bugs.kde.org,